Upvote
0
By clicking “Accept All”, you agree to the storing of cookies on your device to enhance site navigation, analyse site usage, and assist in our marketing efforts
These cookies enable our website and App to remember things such as your region or country, language, accessibility options and your preferences and settings.
Analytic cookies help website owners to understand how visitors interact with websites by collecting and reporting information anonymously.
Marketing cookies are used to track visitors across websites. The intention is to display ads that are relevant and engaging for the individual user and thereby more valuable for publishers and third party advertisers.
The lag is a very good point. Here https://www.gov.uk/guidance/the-r-value-and-growth-rate it says two to three weeks so the number for london on the 24th will be interesting.
I thought the effect of slower growth in the lung is that it is a lot less likely to cause severe illness?
I don't know is the honest answer (and neither does anyone)
Not sure you can draw a link between OTT London mummies into organic baby food and hemp nappies worried about disproved links to autism and whether omicron is dangerous or notExactly.
The data from South Africa might be applicable to the UK but, then again, our infection and vaccine histories, demographics are different, so it's simply not a valid assumption.
UK results are skewed by London which is a hot-bed of ****wit anti-vaxers. Even before covid, the lowest vaccination rate for Measles was in London
Nope - realistic. This could put 30 direct and perhaps another 40 indirect people out of work for three weeks.When you read that back to yourself, don’t you think it sounds a bit…well…neurotic?
That only mentions covid variants. Evolution is a process of random change followed by filtering. Eventually milder covid variants will outcompete the more virulent ones.Yes, in the two sentences at the beginning of the paragraph
That is a strawman argument. It debunks something some random person on Facebook said, not what I said.Viruses can evolve to be more deadly
No but viruses transmitted the way Vovid is do: https://evolution.berkeley.edu/evo-news/evolution-from-a-viruss-view/ usually do.
The link is that it's largely the unvaccinated who are suffering in hospital.Not sure you can draw a link between OTT London mummies into organic baby food and hemp nappies worried about disproved links to autism and whether omicron is dangerous or not
There is a link because those same people are refusing the covid vaccine, which makes the population more vulnerable to any covid variant. As I said earlier:Not sure you can draw a link between OTT London mummies into organic baby food and hemp nappies worried about disproved links to autism and whether omicron is dangerous or not
The proportion of completely unvaccinated people in London is more than three times the proportion nationally.London is very anti-vaxxer. 68% of population over 12 have had atleast one vaccine dose, compared tp 89% nationally, and only 33% have had a third dose compared to 52% nationally. So Londoners are several times more likely to suffer severe illness than the UK average.
That only mentions covid variants. Evolution is a process of random change followed by filtering. Eventually milder covid variants will outcompete the more virulent ones.
The process has probably been slowed by lockdowns (because it increases the ratio of hospital infections to community ones.)
That is a strawman argument. It debunks something some random person on Facebook said, not what I said.
I specifically said
The article I linked to (on the website of an extremely good American univeristy) has more detail.
None of the human viruses given as examples in that article (Ebola, Norovirus, Dengue) are transmitted the same way Covid is. Neither are th two animal viruses mentioned.
Based on your experience, can you explain why Delta was more virulent than the original Covid, Alpha and Beta and outcompeted them all?
Based on your experience, can you explain why Delta was more virulent than the original Covid, Alpha and Beta and outcompeted them all?
So you are saying that the Museum of Paleontologyt at the University of California Berkeley has collaborated with these organisations:For me the clue is Myth.
Nicola Sturgeon has just introduced a three week restriction in Scotland which basically cancels the New Years Eve celebrations of any decent size. A max of 500 at outdoor events, have they never attended Edinburgh’s celebrations in the past?
Cannot see this being popular.
So you are saying that the Museum of Paleontologyt at the University of California Berkeley has collaborated with these organisations:
![]()
About - Understanding Evolution
Understanding Evolution (UE) is a non-commercial, education website, for teaching and learning about the science of evolutionary biology. This site is here to help you understand what evolution is, how it works, and how it factors into your life. This site is a project of the University of...evolution.berkeley.edu
To spread myths?
Edinburgh's official events have all been cancelled already.
An article endorsed by a whole lot of bodies. its clearly the consensus view.I'm going to assume that he knows a bit more than an article aimed at the general public and written in 2007
I still think Omicron will be the end game one way or the other. The way it's going it will be a better rather than worse, outcome.Scottish data now showing that Omicron may be two thirds less harmful (likely to require hospitalisation) than Delta. But ten times more likely to cause re-infection. English data is imminent.
Maybe some good news
![]()
Covid Scotland: Omicron risk of hospitalisation may be two-thirds lower than Delta, study suggests
The Omicron variant of Covid-19 may present a two-thirds lower risk of hospitalisation than Delta, a ground-breaking study by Scottish scientists has suggested.www.scotsman.com
Nobody has ever attempted to suppress covid. It's all been about flattening the curve. And that has worked because most people have heeded the sensible advice over the last two years.When I say the end game I don't mean for Covid, that'll be around forever, I mean for the attempted suppression of it.
You, and they, won't get over your fear if you are surrounded by people in masks all staying away from each other will you ?I see that this thread is going off track AGAIN, and again it is the OP who is doing this. Perhaps just using this thread as a soapbox to peddle his own views.
In the real world people are scared. This is not helped by seeing others going around ignoring the safety advice. Seeing people walking around ignoring social distancing and not wearing masks. Now it does not matter what you believe, nor whether masks do or do not help. What matters is what a significant number of the public believe. If they continue to feel unsafe then they will continue to stay away from shops and hospitality and those businesses will suffer.
Omicron is just another varient. There will be more. Indeed the more people infected, the more people unvaccinated, the more mutations will arise and the more varients will be identified. This will never stop. So there is no "end game". Life has changed and will continue to change. There is no going back.
Errr, that's a contradiction in terms.Nobody has ever attempted to suppress covid. It's all been about flattening the curve. And that has worked because most people have heeded the sensible advice over the last two years.
I do object to people putting words in my mouth and assuming feelings that I don't have, just to make a stupid argument.You, and they, won't get over your fear if you are surrounded by people in masks all staying away from each other will you ?
End game refers to getting back to normal, not the end of Covid, that will never end and we'll all end up getting it. Which will be a good thing, perhaps people like yourself might get over your fear once you have had it.
You are once again cherry picking data. It's quite clear from all your posts on the subject you don't understand epidemiology yet you make bold and rash statements.The evidence about how well Covid has been suppressed by non-pharmacological is scant. How else would you explain the fact Scotland & Wales have had harsher Covid measures than us yet the same or worse outcomes.
If you really believe everyone has got it wrong don't post here. Go and do something about it.@Justin Smith - if you feel so strongly about all this why aren’t you doing something about it? Are you joining in all the protests. Are you publishing your finding on social media? Do you have posters in the shop window? Have you spoken to your MP?
I do not think that in the UK (and many other countries) governments have been clear what they were attempting to do. The first lockdown was explicilty about flateening the curve, but the government denied the end point was herd immunity (or high enough immunity to reduce it to below infections epidemic proportion) through infection, which is what would have happened without vaccines.Nobody has ever attempted to suppress covid. It's all been about flattening the curve.
An interesting quite from one of the scientists quoted in the Nature article:
You, and they, won't get over your fear if you are surrounded by people in masks all staying away from each other will you ?
End game refers to getting back to normal, not the end of Covid, that will never end and we'll all end up getting it. Which will be a good thing, perhaps people like yourself might get over your fear once you have had it.
Errr, that's a contradiction in terms.
The evidence about how well Covid has been suppressed by non-pharmacological is scant. How else would you explain the fact Scotland & Wales have had harsher Covid measures than us yet the same or worse outcomes.
Now over 2000, up another 100 today.Up another 100 today. London is the main location for Omicron, which is why I'm focussed on that. Based on the timing and symptoms, that's probably what I have.
I do not understand why people here are so dissmissive of South African doctors and scientists.Yet omicron is mild, as South Africa always said.
Because both are the clueless and the media sensationalises eveything.Your government and media have lied to you constantly... ask yourself why.
It never ceases to amaze me how some adults still believe things like this are all a conspiracy. I have a picture in my head of them sat in their parents basement wearing tin foil hats, quite entertaining really.No conspiraces
I will ask you - why have they? How do they benefit?Your government and media have lied to you constantly... ask yourself why.
Some people believe the vaccine contains 5G transmitting nano bots that track our activity and allow the Government to control our minds, that's why.so why would they lie?
Being lied to is one thing, and as a sensible adult you can dismiss that. Also seeing incompetence and stupidity you can also dismiss that rather than obsess over it. Both these things you can see and make a sensible decision yourself and get on with your life. I don’t believe half the stuff the Government says, and I’ve lost confidence in them for setting any good example. Oh well, doesn’t mean I’m going to take any chances with people at risk. Just like I will never ride my motorbike without full protective clothing.Not surprising many believe conspiracy theories when they are constantly lied too
Not surprising many believe conspiracy theories when they are constantly lied too, remember, two jabs only required, then you needed a booster, the fourth jab seems to be starting in March next year. Anyone want to place a bet that will be the last?
Meanwhile today I personally met the first NHS staff member I know who had just resigned, refusing to take the jab, which becomes mandatory for all NHS personnel in April next year.
It felt a strange way to end the year, seeing this tearful woman giving up her job, she doesn’t come into direct contact with the public, and had the public clapping for her earlier in the year, during a much more dangerous version of covid, when no one cared if she had been jabbed or not to do her job.
Not sure how many will follow her example, but there are plenty of NHS staff very resentful, but come April they might need to lose their objections on economic grounds alone.