Toggle sidebar

Lottery Data Analizer

Sort by date Sort by votes
L

Lottoclive

Free Member
Jul 10, 2024
22
0
74
Lincoln
Hi I am retired with due diligence I would like to discuss a Lottery Analizer ongoing working program that has been in development for over 30 yrs I am looking for prossesional individuals who have a vested interest in Data Analitical discussions Regards Clive.
 
Upvote 0
Analyse what? It’s a random number generator.

@Lottoclive surely if your app works you should now be a multi-millionaire.
 
Upvote 0
With due respect I am not looking for a start up I a looking for proffesional individuals who who have a vested interest in Lotteries as I have said breakdown of Data that would help players understand how lotteries work this program is not a wheeling hot/ cold theory it a breakdown of Data with numbers in there respective positions using Percentages that syndicate or individual needs to know .
 
Upvote 0
Lottoclive said:
It's not a radom generator it just a Data based breakdown of numbers in relation to each set of numbers.
Click to expand...
Example UK Lotto (59) No Bonus Ball (5 Odd 1 Even ) Ranges Section 1
All Combinations
Found 4,132,674 from 45,057,474
Percentage = 9.172006
Sorted in Ascending Order
Percentages of Found Combinations
Consecutive %
1,282,554 31.034483
Non-Consecutive %
2,850,120 68.965517
Sum Total Found % Consec % Non-Con %

19 5040 0.121955 2240 0.054202 2800 0.067753
16 6160 0.149056 4840 0.117115 1320 0.031941
21 7980 0.193095 3192 0.077238 4788 0.115857
18 10584 0.256105 7644 0.184965 2940 0.071140
23 11880 0.287465 4320 0.104533 7560 0.182932
20 16800 0.406516 11200 0.271011 5600 0.135505
25 16830 0.407242 5610 0.135747 11220 0.271495
27 22880 0.553637 7040 0.170350 15840 0.383287
22 25080 0.606871 15504 0.375157 9576 0.231714
29 30030 0.726648 8580 0.207614
fisicx said:
Analyse what? It’s a random number generator.

@Lottoclive surely if your app works you should now be a multi-millionaire.
Click to expand...

21450 0.519034
24 35640 0.862396 20520 0.496531 15120 0.365865
31 38220 0.924825 10192 0.246620 28028 0.678205
57 40950 0.990884 5850 0.141555 35100 0.849329
33 47320 1.145021 11830 0.286255 35490 0.858766
26 48620 1.176478 26180 0.633488 22440 0.542990
35 57120 1.382156 13440 0.325213 43680 1.056943
28 64064 1.550183 32384 0.783609 31680 0.766574
37 67320 1.628970 14960 0.361993 52360 1.266976
55 70200 1.698658 10400 0.251653 59800 1.447005
39 77520 1.875783 16320 0.394902 61200 1.480881
30 81900 1.981768 39000 0.943699 42900 1.038069
41 87210 2.110256 17442 0.422051 69768 1.688205
53 89700 2.170508 13800 0.333924 75900 1.836583
58 95004 2.298851 24804 0.600193 70200 1.698658
43 95760 2.317144 18240 0.441361 77520 1.875783
51 101200 2.448778 16192 0.391804 85008 2.056973
32 101920 2.466200 45864 1.109790 56056 1.356410
45 102410 2.478057 18620 0.450556 83790 2.027501
47 106260 2.571217 18480 0.447168 87780 2.124048
49 106260 2.571217 17710 0.428536 88550 2.142681
34 123760 2.994671 52780 1.277139 70980 1.717532
36 146880 3.554115 59520 1.440230 87360 2.113886
56 163800 3.963535 44200 1.069525 119600 2.894010
38 170544 4.126723 65824 1.592770 104720 2.533953
40 193800 4.689458 71400 1.727695 122400 2.961763
54 210600 5.095974 58800 1.422808 151800 3.673167
42 215460 5.213574 75924 1.837164 139536 3.376410
44 234080 5.664129 79040 1.912563 155040 3.751566
52 239200 5.788020 69184 1.674073 170016 4.113947
46 247940 5.999505 80360 1.944504 167580 4.055002
50 253000 6.121944 75900 1.836583 177100 4.285361
48 255024 6.170920 79464 1.922823 175560 4.248097

Mean = 43.591133
Median = 45
Mode(s) = 48

Consecutive
Mean = 41.518519
Median = 42
Mode(s) = 46

Non-Consecutive
Mean = 44.523810
Median = 46
Mode(s) = 50
 
Upvote 0
@Lottoclive
What does all of those numbers mean?
Who are they for?
How will they be used?


A long time ago, I got a list of all of the results and worked out which numbers came up the most (simple to do with excel). Crude but effective! I then created data sets based on the most popular numbers. Sadly, I still give a lot more to Camelot than they give me!
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0
UK Lotto (59) No Bonus Ball (5 Odd 1 Even ) Ranges Section 1
All Combinations
Found 4,132,674 from 45,057,474
Percentage = 9.172006
Sorted in Ascending Order
Percentages of Found Combinations
Consecutive %
1,282,554 31.034483
Non-Consecutive %
2,850,120 68.965517
Sum Total Found % Consec % Non-Con %

19 5040 0.121955 2240 0.054202 2800 0.067753
16 6160 0.149056 4840 0.117115 1320 0.031941
21 7980 0.193095 3192 0.077238 4788 0.115857
18 10584 0.256105 7644 0.184965 2940 0.071140
23 11880 0.287465 4320 0.104533 7560 0.182932
20 16800 0.406516 11200 0.271011 5600 0.135505
25 16830 0.407242 5610 0.135747 11220 0.271495
27 22880 0.553637 7040 0.170350 15840 0.383287
22 25080 0.606871 15504 0.375157 9576 0.231714
29 30030 0.726648 8580 0.207614 21450 0.519034
24 35640 0.862396 20520 0.496531 15120 0.365865
31 38220 0.924825 10192 0.246620 28028 0.678205
57 40950 0.990884 5850 0.141555 35100 0.849329
33 47320 1.145021 11830 0.286255 35490 0.858766
26 48620 1.176478 26180 0.633488 22440 0.542990
35 57120 1.382156 13440 0.325213 43680 1.056943
28 64064 1.550183 32384 0.783609 31680 0.766574
37 67320 1.628970 14960 0.361993 52360 1.266976
55 70200 1.698658 10400 0.251653 59800 1.447005
39 77520 1.875783 16320 0.394902 61200 1.480881
30 81900 1.981768 39000 0.943699 42900 1.038069
41 87210 2.110256 17442 0.422051 69768 1.688205
53 89700 2.170508 13800 0.333924 75900 1.836583
58 95004 2.298851 24804 0.600193 70200 1.698658
43 95760 2.317144 18240 0.441361 77520 1.875783
51 101200 2.448778 16192 0.391804 85008 2.056973
32 101920 2.466200 45864 1.109790 56056 1.356410
45 102410 2.478057 18620 0.450556 83790 2.027501
47 106260 2.571217 18480 0.447168 87780 2.124048
49 106260 2.571217 17710 0.428536 88550 2.142681
34 123760 2.994671 52780 1.277139 70980 1.717532
36 146880 3.554115 59520 1.440230 87360 2.113886
56 163800 3.963535 44200 1.069525 119600 2.894010
38 170544 4.126723 65824 1.592770 104720 2.533953
40 193800 4.689458 71400 1.727695 122400 2.961763
54 210600 5.095974 58800 1.422808 151800 3.673167
42 215460 5.213574 75924 1.837164 139536 3.376410
44 234080 5.664129 79040 1.912563 155040 3.751566
52 239200 5.788020 69184 1.674073 170016 4.113947
46 247940 5.999505 80360 1.944504 167580 4.055002
50 253000 6.121944 75900 1.836583 177100 4.285361
48 255024 6.170920 79464 1.922823 175560 4.248097

Mean = 43.591133
Median = 45
Mode(s) = 48

Consecutive
Mean = 41.518519
Median = 42
Mode(s) = 46

Non-Consecutive
Mean = 44.523810
Median = 46
Mode(s) = 50
Paul Kelly ICHYB said:
@Lottoclive
What does all of tose numbers mean?
Who are they for?
How will they be used?


A long time ago, I got a list of all of the results and worked out which numbers came up the most (simple to do with excel). Cruse but effective! I then created data sets based on the most popular numbers. Sadly, I still give a lot more to Camelot than they give me!
Click to expand...
 
Upvote 0
Lottoclive said:
UK Lotto (59) No Bonus Ball (5 Odd 1 Even ) Ranges Section 1
All Combinations
Found 4,132,674 from 45,057,474
Percentage = 9.172006
Sorted in Ascending Order
Percentages of Found Combinations
Consecutive %
1,282,554 31.034483
Non-Consecutive %
2,850,120 68.965517
Sum Total Found % Consec % Non-Con %

19 5040 0.121955 2240 0.054202 2800 0.067753
16 6160 0.149056 4840 0.117115 1320 0.031941
21 7980 0.193095 3192 0.077238 4788 0.115857
18 10584 0.256105 7644 0.184965 2940 0.071140
23 11880 0.287465 4320 0.104533 7560 0.182932
20 16800 0.406516 11200 0.271011 5600 0.135505
25 16830 0.407242 5610 0.135747 11220 0.271495
27 22880 0.553637 7040 0.170350 15840 0.383287
22 25080 0.606871 15504 0.375157 9576 0.231714
29 30030 0.726648 8580 0.207614 21450 0.519034
24 35640 0.862396 20520 0.496531 15120 0.365865
31 38220 0.924825 10192 0.246620 28028 0.678205
57 40950 0.990884 5850 0.141555 35100 0.849329
33 47320 1.145021 11830 0.286255 35490 0.858766
26 48620 1.176478 26180 0.633488 22440 0.542990
35 57120 1.382156 13440 0.325213 43680 1.056943
28 64064 1.550183 32384 0.783609 31680 0.766574
37 67320 1.628970 14960 0.361993 52360 1.266976
55 70200 1.698658 10400 0.251653 59800 1.447005
39 77520 1.875783 16320 0.394902 61200 1.480881
30 81900 1.981768 39000 0.943699 42900 1.038069
41 87210 2.110256 17442 0.422051 69768 1.688205
53 89700 2.170508 13800 0.333924 75900 1.836583
58 95004 2.298851 24804 0.600193 70200 1.698658
43 95760 2.317144 18240 0.441361 77520 1.875783
51 101200 2.448778 16192 0.391804 85008 2.056973
32 101920 2.466200 45864 1.109790 56056 1.356410
45 102410 2.478057 18620 0.450556 83790 2.027501
47 106260 2.571217 18480 0.447168 87780 2.124048
49 106260 2.571217 17710 0.428536 88550 2.142681
34 123760 2.994671 52780 1.277139 70980 1.717532
36 146880 3.554115 59520 1.440230 87360 2.113886
56 163800 3.963535 44200 1.069525 119600 2.894010
38 170544 4.126723 65824 1.592770 104720 2.533953
40 193800 4.689458 71400 1.727695 122400 2.961763
54 210600 5.095974 58800 1.422808 151800 3.673167
42 215460 5.213574 75924 1.837164 139536 3.376410
44 234080 5.664129 79040 1.912563 155040 3.751566
52 239200 5.788020 69184 1.674073 170016 4.113947
46 247940 5.999505 80360 1.944504 167580 4.055002
50 253000 6.121944 75900 1.836583 177100 4.285361
48 255024 6.170920 79464 1.922823 175560 4.248097

Mean = 43.591133
Median = 45
Mode(s) = 48

Consecutive
Mean = 41.518519
Median = 42
Mode(s) = 46

Non-Consecutive
Mean = 44.523810
Median = 46
Mode(s) = 50
Click to expand...
No answer to the questions then?
 
Upvote 0
I'm now totally confused @Lottoclive

Has your numerical analysis made you rich?

If not then I'm struggling to see what value it has. If it has then are you going to be paying these proffesional (sic) individuals for their time?
 
Upvote 0
I have spent over 30yrs developing this program you have to understand what numbers correspondence with the data Do you for example k ow how many numbers there are using no 1 that are 3odd 3even that are 5odd1 even total 150 most people don't I have all the numbers that relate to every postion every total otherwise you are playing blind life is about Percentages random or not random .
 
Upvote 0
Lottoclive said:
you have to understand what numbers correspondence with the data
Click to expand...
Why? We still do not know what you are trying to achieve - we all want to help, but without this basic info, we cannot!
 
Upvote 0
Lottoclive said:
I have spent over 30yrs developing this program you have to understand what numbers correspondence with the data Do you for example k ow how many numbers there are using no 1 that are 3odd 3even that are 5odd1 even total 150 most people don't I have all the numbers that relate to every postion every total otherwise you are playing blind life is about Percentages random or not random .
Click to expand...
And has this program made you rich? Has your analysis resulted in higher than average lotto wins?

Lottoclive said:
They need to be paying me for my knowledge.
Click to expand...
That's not ever going to happen. Unless you can demonstrate consistent winning combinations of lotto numbers.
 
Upvote 0
Paul Kelly ICHYB said:
@Lottoclive
What does all of those numbers mean?
Who are they for?
How will they be used?


A long time ago, I got a list of all of the results and worked out which numbers came up the most (simple to do with excel). Crude but effective! I then created data sets based on the most popular numbers. Sadly, I still give a lot more to Camelot than they give me!
Click to expand...
That data is available on the lottery website anyway!
 
Upvote 0
I'm afraid I'm also confused about what the OP is asking, what are you looking for?
If you are looking for investment, then just like any business investment, I would want to see evidence of success, so I would like to see proof that you are making a positive return on the number of lottery tickets purchased with documented evidence and clear financial due diligence. Basically, proof that a profit is being made.

Honestly, I don't care about the statistic numbers themselves nor any program. All I care about is the company financials and evidence that the business (program) performance with the founder risking their own money for 1-2 years proving the business.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Nathanto
Upvote 0
Lottoclive said:
With due respect I am not looking for a start up I a looking for proffesional individuals who who have a vested interest in Lotteries as I have said breakdown of Data that would help players understand how lotteries work this program is not a wheeling hot/ cold theory it a breakdown of Data with numbers in there respective positions using Percentages that syndicate or individual needs to know .
Click to expand...
Most people know how lotteries work. You pays your money you takes your chance.

Is it not a little disengenuous to suggest understanding previous results might give you an insight into tonight’s numbers?
 
Upvote 0
Lottoclive said:
I have spent over 30yrs developing this program you have to understand what numbers correspondence with the data Do you for example k ow how many numbers there are using no 1 that are 3odd 3even that are 5odd1 even total 150 most people don't I have all the numbers that relate to every postion every total otherwise you are playing blind life is about Percentages random or not random .
Click to expand...

How many lottery jackpots have you won?
 
Upvote 0
Lottoclive said:
They need to be paying me for my knowledge.
Click to expand...
All lotteries are supposed to be random based I am simply giving information of data that shows the amount of combinations that rate to each number of positions in helps people understand about how lotteries work j am not trying to be a millionaire just helping people understand where the best positions are for syndicates.
 
Upvote 0
Ozzy said:
I'm afraid I'm also confused about what the OP is asking, what are you looking for?
If you are looking for investment, then just like any business investment, I would want to see evidence of success, so I would like to see proof that you are making a positive return on the number of lottery tickets purchased with documented evidence and clear financial due diligence. Basically, proof that a profit is being made.

Honestly, I don't care about the statistic numbers themselves nor any program. All I care about is the company financials and evidence that the business (program) performance with the founder risking their own money for 1-2 years proving the business.
Click to expand...
Be my quest under a none disclosure I would love you to oversee what I have best regards Clive.
 
Upvote 0
Lottoclive said:
All lotteries are supposed to be random based I am simply giving information of data that shows the amount of combinations that rate to each number of positions in helps people understand about how lotteries work j am not trying to be a millionaire just helping people understand where the best positions are for syndicates.
Click to expand...
The only advantage you can possibly gain as a syndicate in a fair lottery where the ball drawn is independent of the one before is by knowing what numbers are more likely to have been picked by others to ensure that should you win you share the jackpot with the least number of other people.

The chance of drawing a particular ball is 1/59 the second ball is then 1/58 going down to 1/54 for the 6th.

That is simple gcse level maths/stats
 
Upvote 0
Lottoclive said:
Be my quest under a none disclosure I would love you to oversee what I have best regards Clive.
Click to expand...
I don't believe you're ready for investment yet, and this question doesn't need an NDA yet to state what your current ROI is. What is your current ROI on this?
 
Upvote 0
In the 90s, I created Doctor Lottery, a Windows-based lottery analyser and simulator. Its predecessor was a command line simulator developed for DOS. The Windows version, sold as shareware on magazine cover-mounted CD-ROMs, performed well.
 
Upvote 0
Lottoclive said:
Do you for example k ow how many numbers there are using no 1 that are 3odd 3even that are 5odd1 even
Click to expand...
Why would I want to know this?

Lottoclive said:
I have a program that gives the lottery player a breakdown of all the combinations of for example a 6/49 with the numbers
Click to expand...
What for? There are billions of them, and you can download the list in loads of places; it has no value.

Lottoclive said:
numbers in there respective positions using Percentages
Click to expand...
Position of the numbers doesn't matter, except bonus, so who cares.

fisicx said:
has your program increased your winnings from the lottery?
Click to expand...
I think this is the wrong question.

@Lottoclive Have you ever actually played the lottery?
 
Upvote 0
My experience was similar. Despite retaining a 26% stake, I still incurred a 74% loss. Although I had many wins, across countless simulations, I was unable to turn a profit. I replicated this approach in the 1980s using C++ on a college computer with simulations of roulette and craps, but the house consistently prevailed. The key takeaway is that you must be the house or the one setting the betting terms.
 
Upvote 0
Talktime said:
I replicated this approach in the 1980s using C++ on a college computer with simulations of roulette and craps, but the house consistently prevailed.
Click to expand...
Exactly. There is only one, just one, formula on the roulette table where the odds are in your favour but if you get caught playing you get asked to leave (bet on two columns every time, and double your stake when you lose a round). It gives you a 66% chance of success, and it is the only method.

The lottery is a very profitable business; no magic algorithm or program will change that. It's gambling, and with any form of gambling, the odds are always in the house's favour.
 
  • Like
Reactions: IanSuth
Upvote 0
Ozzy said:
Exactly. There is only one, just one, formula on the roulette table where the odds are in your favour but if you get caught playing you get asked to leave (bet on two columns every time, and double your stake when you lose a round). It gives you a 66% chance of success, and it is the only method.

The lottery is a very profitable business; no magic algorithm or program will change that. It's gambling, and with any form of gambling, the odds are always in the house's favour.
Click to expand...
Asked to leave or run out of money fast, doubling gets very expensive
 
Upvote 0
Not long after the lottery started in the UK, it was a multi-rollover week. Perhaps three or four weeks, and for the first time you could bet on all the possible combinations and it would cost less than the potential jackpot. The risk was you may have to share it of course.

One such syndicate was going to try this. But they'd leave out all the consecutive number combinations, because they'd never come up. I then spent an hour arguing with a colleague that there was exactly the same chance of 1,2,3,4,5 and 6 coming up as 1,4,14,23,45 and 49. So if you're going to leave out the first one, you may as well leave out the second one.

OP, you're offering an awful lot of data that's absolutely no use to anyone hoping to win the lottery.
 
Upvote 0
IanSuth said:
The only advantage you can possibly gain as a syndicate in a fair lottery where the ball drawn is independent of the one before is by knowing what numbers are more likely to have been picked by others to ensure that should you win you share the jackpot with the least number of other people.

The chance of drawing a particular ball is 1/59 the second ball is then 1/58 going down to 1/54 for the 6th.

That is simple gcse level maths/stats
Click to expand...

MikeJ said:
Not long after the lottery started in the UK, it was a multi-rollover week. Perhaps three or four weeks, and for the first time you could bet on all the possible combinations and it would cost less than the potential jackpot. The risk was you may have to share it of course.

One such syndicate was going to try this. But they'd leave out all the consecutive number combinations, because they'd never come up. I then spent an hour arguing with a colleague that there was exactly the same chance of 1,2,3,4,5 and 6 coming up as 1,4,14,23,45 and 49. So if you're going to leave out the first one, you may as well leave out the second one.

OP, you're offering an awful lot of data that's absolutely no use to anyone hoping to win the lottery
Click to expand...
 
Upvote 0
I thnk he's talking about something like this, https://lotterycodex.com/uk-lotto-659/ but as they're selling it for $37, not sure who's going to invest.

MikeJ said:
I then spent an hour arguing with a colleague that there was exactly the same chance of 1,2,3,4,5 and 6 coming up as 1,4,14,23,45 and 49. So if you're going to leave out the first one, you may as well leave out the second one.
Click to expand...
They were right, you were wrong. It has the same chance of coming up, but it is also one of the most commonly played set of number being bought 7 - 10,000 times each lottery.

So even if you won £100M, you'd actually get £10k, which would be a bit gutting.
 
Upvote 0
Hi I am not offering anything only interested in proffesional lottery players who have a vested interest in The breakdown of Data regards Clive
 
Upvote 0
Lottoclive said:
Hi I am not offering anything only interested in proffesional lottery players who have a vested interest in The breakdown of Data regards Clive
Click to expand...
Why would they pay you for this breakdown if it's not going to improve their chances of winning?
 
Upvote 0
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Tigris
Car Dealership Support Advice - Faulty from day 1
Replies
3
Views
1K
Time Out
FreddyG
F
T
Premises rent increases
Replies
7
Views
3K
General Business Forum
tallblonde
T
Ozzy
ANNA has acquired Business Data Group (BDG) and UK Business Forums (UKBF) 🎉
Replies
0
Views
2K
Messages from UKBF
Ozzy
Ozzy
L
Portugal
Replies
3
Views
2K
Overseas Trade
oxetafixes
O
ToffeeStack
Looking to help a few small businesses with a free website
Replies
24
Views
17K
Start Up Space
EnterprisePro
E

Latest Articles

Top Bottom
Back