Perhaps they should.
My Dad used to lecture in Accountancy, I'm sure he told me that banks do need deposits to lend money, but they can lend multiples of that money.
Are you saying that used to be the case and now it isn't ? If that is so it explains a lot as to why so many banks give FA interest on their savings accounts.
But, on the other hand, if banks (and, one assumes building societies) do not need deposits in order to make loans, why do some offer relatively good savings rates ? What's in it for them ?
Since the financial crash there are rules covering the level of reserves a bank needs to hold, it is a very complex area and consultants (my brother is one) who can help banks ensure they meet the regs but at the least cost to themselves do very well out of it
to quote the first paragraph of this document (note the bit i have bolded - even they admit what they do isnt the real economy)
This document presents one of the Basel Committee’s key reforms to develop a more resilient banking sector: the Liquidity Coverage Ratio (LCR). The objective of the LCR is to promote the short-term resilience of the liquidity risk profile of banks. It does this by ensuring that banks have an adequate stock of unencumbered high-quality liquid assets (HQLA) that can be converted easily and immediately in private markets into cash to meet their liquidity needs for a 30 calendar day liquidity stress scenario. The LCR will improve the banking sector’s ability to absorb shocks arising from financial and economic stress, whatever the source, thus reducing the risk of spillover from the financial sector to the real economy. This document sets out the LCR standard and timelines for its implementation.
https://www.bis.org/publ/bcbs238.pdf
Upvote
0
