Teacher in Mohammed Teddybear situation

Subbynet

Free Member
Aug 1, 2005
6,000
1,101
44
Luton
But they all had the means to do something about their threats. You cannot kill someone if you don't have a gun or bomb making equipment.

If I say "I'm going to kill you". Then walk off, is my threat any less real? Or are you going to wait until you see me again to find out?

Its a very naive position to take, and one which has proven to cost the lives of people.

Of course we must stop these people before they take action but what was it this girl did that required arrest, when we don't arrest so many others but keep them under observation?

The very same thing the guys involved in 7/7 did, and recent history told us it was a mistake to stop following the two 7/7 bombers which MI5 were tailing beforehand.

So at which point do you jump in and take action? (Considering last time we were too late to save 52 people, and countless others who last arms, legs and eyesight!)

Funny old thing is history. If you study it enough, you become better at predicting the future - especially where humans are concerned.
 
Upvote 0
and recent history told us it was a mistake to stop following the two 7/7 bombers which MI5 were tailing beforehand.

Exactly, so why wasn't this girl monitored and when she actully began to do something about her views then arrest her? I have read a couple of posts that state she was trying to send money to a terrorist organisation but I can't find any news reports that say this.

And why did we stop following them?

So at which point do you jump in and take action? (Considering last time we were too late to save 52 people, and countless others who last arms, legs and eyesight!)

I honestly don't know but what I do know is this particular case is turning more young people toward the 'west is out to get us' attitude and we know where that leads. I do not hear the same comments about the arrests of the guys that came to Cumbria to train.

Funny old thing is history. If you study it enough, you become better at predicting the future - especially where humans are concerned.

Correct. So here is my prediction. The more we back Israel in their illegal actions, push Iran into a corner, kill Iraqi's, make friends with loonies like bin Laden then turn against them when they are no longer of use and arrest people for thought crimes - the more terrorists we will create on home soil.

When we begin to see that our actions are encouraging these people and begin peaceful dialogue then we may have a chance of stopping them.
 
Upvote 0

Subbynet

Free Member
Aug 1, 2005
6,000
1,101
44
Luton
Exactly, so why wasn't this girl monitored and when she actully began to do something about her views then arrest her? I have read a couple of posts that state she was trying to send money to a terrorist organisation but I can't find any news reports that say this.

And why did we stop following them?

Because they, like you, thought these guys wasn't a immediate threat but a extreme young persons to keep tabs on. Couldn't be more wrong tho.

I honestly don't know but what I do know is this particular case is turning more young people toward the 'west is out to get us' attitude and we know where that leads. I do not hear the same comments about the arrests of the guys that came to Cumbria to train.

Exactly, its a hard call - and I'm responsible for zero lives. Now put yourself in the position of the police and ask yourself, is action better than no action? Ask yourself, if you have seen the signs before (and the aftermath) do you ignore it now?

And who is fueling the "West Hates Us Attitude"? Is it "the west", "Britain"? If its Britain, why do some many Muslims live here? Why do we have Muslim MP's? Is daily life for Muslims honestly a battle? I think not.

Faith is a funny thing, but its even harder to tackle when the prize for dying for the cause is going to heaven with however-many virgins.

WHO can get through to these people? These people have Mum's and Dads, Brothers and Sisters, and friends, but they don't all turn extreme - but these people are the closest. Yet, they say there were no signs of extremism.

These extreme nutters are not just killing "the west", just as many Muslims were injured in 7/7 - what does that say about their cause?

Its taken two Muslim MP's to make any difference for the teacher, so is this fight a fight for "Britain", or for moderate progressive British Muslims?

Correct. So here is my prediction. The more we back Israel in their illegal actions, push Iran into a corner, kill Iraqi's, make friends with loonies like bin Laden then turn against them when they are no longer of use and arrest people for thought crimes - the more terrorists we will create on home soil.

When we begin to see that our actions are encouraging these people and begin peaceful dialogue then we may have a chance of stopping them.

Yup, I agree, huge mistakes have been made in the past.

There will always be terrorists. All over the world in one respect or another people are considered terrorists. But is Britain honestly a supporter of Israel over the Palestinians? Hell no, and I think the release of the BBC reporter tells us they don't believe that ever... I don't agree with the actions of Israel. Were we in Britain learnt lessons with the IRA - it appears Israel keeps making the same mistakes.

But would you think peace came to N'Ireland because they thought it will reunite soon? For me no, we showed them a world which was better.. Jobs, Security, Prosperity. And thats the problem for the Middle East, when all you have left to fight for is the land under your feet - its worth dying for.

One day Israel will work this out.
 
Upvote 0
Because they, like you, thought these guys wasn't a immediate threat but a extreme young persons to keep tabs on. Couldn't be more wrong tho.

Surely the point is they stopped keeping tabs on them?

Exactly, its a hard call - and I'm responsible for zero lives. Now put yourself in the position of the police and ask yourself, is action better than no action? Ask yourself, if you have seen the signs before (and the aftermath) do you ignore it now?

I am not saying ignore it, I do not think we can or should ignore it. What I am saying is that our actions have to be proportional. I wait with interest to see what sentence she gets on Thursday as I believe that can have either a positive or negative effect on young Muslims in Britain.

And who is fueling the "West Hates Us Attitude"? Is it "the west", "Britain"? If its Britain, why do some many Muslims live here? Why do we have Muslim MP's? Is daily life for Muslims honestly a battle? I think not.

What we are talking about is ideology. Many young Muslims, like anarchists, nazi's, punks, etc look for something to feel part of, to be angry about. Why do you think these groups campaign in Universities? Young people think they can change the world. Nazi's come up with conspiracy theories about Jews secretly controlling the government and all the banks and Muslims in the last decade or so see a conspiracy against Islam. What we need to do is not feed into that and I don't mean pander to them but ensure our actions are not hypocrytical. How can we shout about barbaric practices and human rights when we are secretly kidnapping people and waterboarding? Yes lock them up and throw away the key but don't be hypocrites, it feeds their anger.

Faith is a funny thing, but its even harder to tackle when the prize for dying for the cause is going to heaven with however-many virgins.

Well if you can find that as a prize in the Quran I would be interested to read it. Suicide is also strictly forbidden. Doesn't this indicate their actions are political and not based on their faith?f you are interested in the truth then have a read of this, I chose this one because it is written by a Jewish Rabbi so I believe quite an unbiased view:

http://www.islamfortoday.com/firestone01.htm

This is his conclusion:

Whom can you trust, if not God? But God has also been manipulated, and this is the saddest aspect of the complex we call the Middle East. God has been hijacked by terrorists. Islam is not the problem. Terrorism is the problem, and terrorists have hijacked both Islam and God.

WHO can get through to these people?

That is an excellent question and a positive comment, thank you.

Firstly we can see from this lunacy in Sudan that it takes Muslims to educate other Muslims. What can Britain do, first off they need to deal with the issue of groups recruiting in educational institutions. Also, stop giving political asylum to members of groups that are banned in the Middle East - I mean good god, if the Arab Muslims think these people are dangerous loonies then why on earth are we letting them in here?

These extreme nutters are not just killing "the west", just as many Muslims were injured in 7/7 - what does that say about their cause?

It means they have been brainwashed into a crazy political ideology and it is that we must fight, not Islam itself.

Its taken two Muslim MP's to make any difference for the teacher, so is this fight a fight for "Britain", or for moderate progressive British Muslims?

Definately the latter and that is what people must realise, there is a fight within Islam for hearts and minds going on. The wests influence on that fight must be to back the moderate progressives, to give them a platform. Look at the Muslim groups that condemned this madness in Sudan, where was it reported? Change can only come from within but what I am saying is that current actions and attitudes of the west are largely helping the radical side, giving them something to use against the moderates.

Were we in Britain learnt lessons with the IRA - it appears Israel keeps making the same mistakes.

IMO where the West is supporting Israel is by not bringing them to account when they break international laws. Yes Arab countries do it too but being a hypocrite doesn't put you in the right.

And thats the problem for the Middle East, when all you have left to fight for is the land under your feet - its worth dying for.

Very well said. That does not excuse their actions but in their shoes what would we do? The latest 'peace' talks stated that Palestine, having agreed now Israel is a state, must also now agree it is 'a Jewish state' before Israel will negotiate. Does that sound like ethnic cleansing waiting to happen? It does to the Palestinians (who's legally and democratically elected government was banned from the talks). We evntually had to talk to the IRA to get any form peace, so when are we going to learn?

One day Israel will work this out.

I really hope so but I doubt without external pressure.

Sorry I am wrattling on but it is an issue I clearly feel very strongly about.
 
Upvote 0

Subbynet

Free Member
Aug 1, 2005
6,000
1,101
44
Luton
Surely the point is they stopped keeping tabs on them?

Yeah, but resources are not infinite. Its hard to pick and choose who are the most extreme of the extremists being monitored. :(

I am not saying ignore it, I do not think we can or should ignore it. What I am saying is that our actions have to be proportional. I wait with interest to see what sentence she gets on Thursday as I believe that can have either a positive or negative effect on young Muslims in Britain.

I think its wholly proportional, and I'd expect Muslims too aswell. Unless, any person can give at least one good reason for the texts she wrote, the books she had, the people she was in contact with.

What did she expect if they found till receipts with stuff like she wrote on it... To do that at work and not even hide the evidence takes a disturbed mind.

What we are talking about is ideology. Many young Muslims, like anarchists, nazi's, punks, etc look for something to feel part of, to be angry about. Why do you think these groups campaign in Universities? Young people think they can change the world. Nazi's come up with conspiracy theories about Jews secretly controlling the government and all the banks and Muslims in the last decade or so see a conspiracy against Islam. What we need to do is not feed into that and I don't mean pander to them but ensure our actions are not hypocrytical. How can we shout about barbaric practices and human rights when we are secretly kidnapping people and waterboarding? Yes lock them up and throw away the key but don't be hypocrites, it feeds their anger.

Well, Punks and Anarchists are one thing, but Nazism and Extremism in the fringes of Islam is quite something else!

You apply its us feeding the fire, but its not, its the fact that moderate Muslims stand vocally offended and can't differentiate between themselves and those who have hi-jacked the name of Islam. This makes the extreme ones think people are on their side. Its Muslims themselves who must stand up and say you do not speak for me, your actions are not in my name.

Now - I am going to say, slowly, very slowly, and I think this teacher incident is an example, British Muslims are starting to take the stand and we heard it this week. (But by heck we seen the other side in Sudan!)

We don't kidnap people, nor waterboard... Frankly I also think America is out of control... But do you bite the hand which feeds you (Britain) or the hand which punches you (America)? If the annoyed British Muslims stood up and told America to stop, marched in the name of humanity and not religion - all the British people would be right behind them...(As the 1 Million which did over Iraq) And the British people are not the Government. Tony B has a lot to answer for.

Well if you can find that as a prize in the Quran I would be interested to read it. Suicide is also strictly forbidden. Doesn't this indicate their actions are political and not based on their faith?f you are interested in the truth then have a read of this:

http://www.guardian.co.uk/saturday_review/story/0,,631332,00.html

I can't - but thats the point... Its being told to these people who are brainwashed to believe it... Suicide might be forbidden, but call it je-had (I apologise for the spelling of that !) and is it now forbidden? It appears not.


That is an excellent question and a positive comment, thank you.

Firstly we can see from this lunacy in Sudan that it takes Muslims to educate other Muslims. What can Britain do, first off they need to deal with the issue of groups recruiting in educational institutions. Also, stop giving political asylum to members of groups that are banned in the Middle East - I mean good god, if the Arab Muslims think these people are dangerous loonies then why on earth are we letting them in here?

Yeah, but the UK has a record of giving asylum to people who even we don't like or trust... Were a forward thinking society, and a better one for being able to allow these people in... We do the same for all. That doesn't mean we agree with that person tho... We can't change our standards to panda to others who disagree.

It seems like all leaders in exile end up in the UK.

It means they have been brainwashed into a crazy political ideology and it is that we must fight, not Islam itself.

And as I said earlier - the moderate Muslims will be tarred with the same brush unless they stand as say otherwise. Remember the football thugs, everyone got tarred with that until the normal decent supporters kicked out the scum themselves.

The footy supports were scared at first because of reprisal, and no doubt Muslim people are too... But its a step which has to be taken.

Definately the latter and that is what people must realise, there is a fight within Islam for hearts and minds going on. The wests influence on that fight must be to back the moderate progressives, to give them a platform. Look at the Muslim groups that condemned this madness in Sudan, where was it reported? Change can only come from within but what I am saying is that current actions and attitudes of the west are largely helping the radical side, giving them something to use against the moderates.

I hate "The West", its far to broad really... But focusing on Britain - Take Dr Baki from the Muslim Council of Britain. His recent comments were terrible, yet he is the main man speaking for the faith. Britain doesn't want to integrate with Islam culture - we have our own culture nurtured over hundreds of years and world wars... You want to be a Muslim, fine, want to pray, fine, want a Mosque or Church, fine... But don't expect or force others to live that way. Thats not the British way.

In this country probably more than any, you can be what you want to be. The British people are not scared is Islam or anything else.

IMO where the West is supporting Israel is by not bringing them to account when they break international laws. Yes Arab countries do it too but being a hypocrite doesn't put you in the right.

Yeah I'll certainly give you that. When Israel bombed Lebanon we should have FORCED Israel to stop, and put the hard line on America to not back them... Why our Prime Minister didn't say anything only he knows - for sure the rest of the country called for it.

Very well said. That does not excuse their actions but in their shoes what would we do? The latest 'peace' talks stated that Palestine, having agreed now Israel is a state, must also now agree it is 'a Jewish state' before Israel will negotiate. Does that sound like ethnic cleansing waiting to happen? It does to the Palestinians (who's legally and democratically elected government was banned from the talks). We evntually had to talk to the IRA to get any form peace, so when are we going to learn?

Its that royal "we" again. The West put as a single club all believing in the same thing and were vastly different. Take the US, us in the UK would never allow are MP's to be on about God like they do... (Despite a large part of the country being Christian) We think those who hear words from God are mad, but in the US they believe it. We and the US are completely different in many ways.

Britain learned from the IRA (not quickly, but we did), we understand that you need to talk (which is why like above we won't just kick people out of our country) We understand thanks to our largely secular state that its a mistake to say "Jewish State".

Frankly and its often been said, but we truly are in this country much better at understanding cultures than the US. I hate the fact the US takes the lead - it makes be cringe...(Only a couple of Presidents have been any good) We didn't pander to the IRA, we set a hard line. Bomb us, and you lose out, talk to us, and you can gain. It was a long time coming but they found out how to deal with us, and us with them.

If we (and I mean those idiots who run our country) could take Israel by the scruff, and give a lead from our experience, and position of being able to talk to both sides.. We would get somewhere... But its the US again, and there unrelenting support for Israel no matter what.

Tonight they have stopped the supply of Petrol! And now the generators in the hospitals are about to stop... Just how stupid are they to think this will help anyone.

Sorry I am wrattling on but it is an issue I clearly feel very strongly about.

lol, no worries... all good debate :)
 
Upvote 0
Fundamentalist terrorism didn't come to UK until after the Iraq war - is that just a coincidence?
It came to the West (e.g., 9/11), just not to London. We responded; we are not aggressors in any way, shape, or form.

You are right the puppet government there can do nothing
I must pick you up on this. The Iraqi government is one of very few democratically elected governments in the region. The only others are Israel and Afghanistan (again the result of our intervention). As such, these are the only credible leaders in the region. If any governments in the region deserve the epithet "puppet", it's those who cow-tow to all the dictators.

it actually takes away a lot of rights for women that they enjoyed before the war.
Can you give some examples? As far as I can see, girls are now allowed to go to school, for example, when they were previously barred. Women are allowed to vote now when they weren't allowed before. Everything I've heard implies that women are much better off now than before.

It is just sickening to see this spreading of 'democracy' in action.
You're kidding, right? Democracy instead of cruel dictatorship is sickening? Freedom instead of oppression is sickening? Being allowed to have opinions instead of being gassed for complaining is sickening? I don't think so!

When we begin to see that our actions are encouraging these people and begin peaceful dialogue then we may have a chance of stopping them.
Our actions, undoubtedly, have stopped many other terrorist acts. Our actions have brought democracy to two countries that previously suffered oppression. There is no point trying to dialogue with madmen (you can look at just about every century in history to see this); they see it as a sign of weakness.
 
Upvote 0
When Israel bombed Lebanon we should have FORCED Israel to stop, and put the hard line on America to not back them
Why? Israel was attacked - for the umpteetumth time. Why shouldn't the country defend itself?

If we (and I mean those idiots who run our country) could take Israel by the scruff, and give a lead from our experience, and position of being able to talk to both sides.. We would get somewhere... But its the US again, and there unrelenting support for Israel no matter what.
The Palestinians have cleverly rewritten history, and it's having an effect. I challenge everyone to look at history carefully before apportioning blame. Israel is a small country surrounded by nations that have pledged to overrun it and have attacked it many times. They have a right to defend themselves, and sometimes that means taking pre-emptive action. I can quite understand their predicament.
 
Upvote 0
I think its wholly proportional, and I'd expect Muslims too aswell.

But that is what I am trying to explain, they don't see it as proportional. Even those of us that totally disagree with her thought process feel it was heavy handed.

Who was she in contact with? I have just read what is in the press and haven't seen anything about who she contacted or this business of trying to pay money. Maybe that information would change my mind.

What did she expect if they found till receipts with stuff like she wrote on it... To do that at work and not even hide the evidence takes a disturbed mind.

I agree, so why isn't she under medical supervision? We (there it is again - I mean the UK) have arrested plenty of potential terrorists and how many had notebooks full of rantings? She is clearly in need of mental health care, not prison.

You apply its us feeding the fire, but its not,

I am sorry but at times it is, our government are not innocent victims in all this mess.

its the fact that moderate Muslims stand vocally offended and can't differentiate between themselves and those who have hi-jacked the name of Islam.

Most of us can and do differentiate very clearly but have no idea what we can do about it. I don't know any terrorists, so how can I stop them or re-educate them? I suppose I could write a letter to bin Laden c/o Afghanistan - maybe it would get there?!

This makes the extreme ones think people are on their side.

Forgive me but that is so wrong. The extremists are told regularly that they are wrong and they do not speak for us. They answer 'you are kaffir' (meaning unbelievers). I hear this all the time, 'moderate Muslims must speak out' and we do (I could fill pages with links to moderate Muslims speaking out) but what do we do if we are not listened to?

Just look at projects like Salaam/Shalom radio in the UK (Muslims and Jews working together for peace). Why wasn't that plastered all over our press and tv?

British Muslims are starting to take the stand and we heard it this week. (But by heck we seen the other side in Sudan!)

Yes they are and it will be a slow process I am afraid. Look at the protests in Glasgow, Muslims marched against the terrorist attack. Again, how much press time did that get? This is what I am saying, the media is only interested in the negative, it sells better.

What I am suggesting is that the UK needs to educate itself, not through the media but through moderate scholars. When you understand what the truth is you can then fight against the lies and misconceptions. If you just accept the lies and misconceptions then the devil grows horns.

The other issue is that in the Middle East people believe our moderate scholars have been 'swayed' by living in the west. So why isn't the government arranging an annual meeting, bringing Eastern and Western scholars together so they can all sing from the same hymn book?

We don't kidnap people, nor waterboard...

I am afraid we do and much worse besides, although not to the degree of the US who in my opinion have gone doo lally tap in the first order.

If the annoyed British Muslims stood up and told America to stop, marched in the name of humanity and not religion.

Yes we marched about Iraq in the UK - did the government withdraw from the war? Yet you think we can change US policy? The majority of Americans are against the war, they march and protest but has it made any difference?

No we are not the government but somebody relected Blair 3 times. What signal do you think that sends to the Iraqi's and Palestinians? In the same way you talk above about radical Muslims thinking we support them because we don't speak out loudly enough, people assume that we keep electing this **** person so we must support his policies on Iraq/Palestine/Israel.

Do you see how it works both ways? A vast majority of Muslims don't support terrorism but we are tarred with the same brush - well guess what happens every time Blair or Bush is re-elected?

I can't - but thats the point... Its being told to these people who are brainwashed to believe it... Suicide might be forbidden, but call it je-had (I apologise for the spelling of that !) and is it now forbidden? It appears not.

Jihad is a duty. The word jihad translates as 'struggle' and every Muslim has two forms of Jihad. One is an internal personal struggle to follow the faith correctly and the other is war against oppression. However, there are very strict prohibitions, which includes being forbidden to kill a non combatant, animals or even cut down trees - you can only fight those that are actively fighting you. The nutters teach that the UK is the oppressor of Iraq therefore every citizen of the UK is a combatant - utter cr*p but it is what they teach and they are very clever at teaching it.

An example - In Afghanistan the terrorists now pick uneducated young men as suicide bombers. They put vests on them, with a remote controlled detonator. The young man is told that when the time is right G-d Himself will detonate the explosives. :eek: These young men believe it, they don't press a button so to them it must be G-d that does it. Other young men are told to watch, they see he doesn't press a button and hey presto they see a miracle and another group are ready to die for G-d. :(

This is where education comes into it, get moderate scholars into the education system and ban the nutters before our youth start falling for the same insanity.

It seems like all leaders in exile end up in the UK.

So at what point are we going to stop importing these terrorist groups? Sorry but it is like saying we (the British) love dogs so we are going to take in dogs with rabies. Then we complain when the dog bites us - it doesn't make sense and we must stop it.

Remember the football thugs, everyone got tarred with that until the normal decent supporters kicked out the scum themselves.

And many mosques are now stopping these people from taking over, it is a slow process and people had to learn the hard way I am afraid.

I hate "The West", its far to broad really... But focusing on Britain - Take Dr Baki from the Muslim Council of Britain. His recent comments were terrible, yet he is the main man speaking for the faith.

You would need to give me a clue as to what Dr Bari said. He is not the main man speaking for the faith and is not an Islamic scholar. He did say this recently, which I do agree with:

"Terrorists are terrorists, they may use religion but we shouldn't say Muslim terrorists, it stigmatises the whole community. We never called the IRA Catholic terrorists."

Why our Prime Minister didn't say anything only he knows - for sure the rest of the country called for it.

So you accept that our citizens wanted our democratically elected government to stop something but it didn't stop. So just how do you think we moderate Muslims can stop terrorists?

The West put as a single club all believing in the same thing and were vastly different.

I agree we are different - until it comes to politics and then 'we' allow the US to lead us around by the nose and the world watches and laughs. I can assure you that in the Mid East there is zero respect for our government because time and again they have followed the US even against the peoples wishes.

Then add the incredible idea of appointing Blair as 'peace envoy' to the Middle East (which bunch of bloody nutters came up with that idea). It would be laughable if it wasn't such a reflection of the 'wests' views on the ME.

Britain learned from the IRA (not quickly, but we did), we understand that you need to talk

So why after the election of Hamas did Bush immediately say 'do not talk to them' and our government said 'yeah ok sir'? We should know better not inviting them to peace talks has just given them more ammunition to recruit more terrorists to attack Israel.

But its the US again, and there unrelenting support for Israel no matter what.

Unfortunately that is one of the main issues within radical Islam. Even moderates that are happy to live side by side with Jews and accept an Israeli state are finding that bitter pill too hard to swallow. And the UK just follows along with the US.

I used to have huge fights with my husband about the political situation in the ME (I supported the west - quite fanatically at times). Then during the Lebanon war last year I watched Bush standing in front of boxes of arms to be sent to Israel and it was a rude awakening for me. That is when I started to see things from both sides (well trying to anyway).

Tonight they have stopped the supply of Petrol! And now the generators in the hospitals are about to stop... Just how stupid are they to think this will help anyone.

Have you looked up how many Palestinians have died in the last 2 months trying to get to hospitals? The ambulances are not allowed on 'Jewish only' roads and 6 hours at each checkpoint tends not to help when your life is at risk. But the UK & US governments are doing what about it? Can you find anything in the Geneva convention that allows roads just for one faith? It is aparteid and our government sits and watches and does nothing. Then we re-elect them and the clear signal is sent that we support their stance.

My views about Israel are entirely political and not a reflection of my thoughts about their faith or right to exist.
 
Upvote 0
It came to the West (e.g., 9/11), just not to London. We responded; we are not aggressors in any way, shape, or form.

Sorry but do you really believe that the US & UK governments were just innocently sitting around and the bad guys came to get us? Have you heard of the Soviet-Afghan war? What about the 'arc of crisis' (where the US government actively supported radical Islamists against the Soviets)? This didn't all just start in 2003.

I must pick you up on this. The Iraqi government is one of very few democratically elected governments in the region. The only others are Israel and Afghanistan (again the result of our intervention). As such, these are the only credible leaders in the region. If any governments in the region deserve the epithet "puppet", it's those who cow-tow to all the dictators.

Ah yes the peaceful countries of Israel and Afghanistan!! You failed to mention the democratically elected Hamas or don't they count because they are not hand picked by our governments? Why do you think the US was giving money to Fatah (one of the most corrupt leaderships in the region) to run their election campaign prior to the elections? (but it did help Hamas get into power).

Can you give some examples? As far as I can see, girls are now allowed to go to school, for example, when they were previously barred. Women are allowed to vote now when they weren't allowed before. Everything I've heard implies that women are much better off now than before.

I have no idea where you get the idea that girls were not allowed to be educated? Quite the reverse, it was law that all children must be educated.

This is from Human Rights News:

[FONT=Geneva, Arial][SIZE=-1]Historically, Iraqi women and girls have enjoyed relatively more rights than many of their counterparts in the Middle East. The Iraqi Provisional Constitution (drafted in 1970) formally guaranteed equal rights to women and other laws specifically ensured their right to vote, attend school, run for political office, and own property. Yet, since the 1991 Gulf War, the position of women within Iraqi society has deteriorated rapidly. Women and girls were disproportionately affected by the economic consequences of the U.N. sanctions, and lacked access to food, health care, and education. These effects were compounded by changes in the law that restricted women's mobility and access to the formal sector in an effort to ensure jobs to men and appease conservative religious and tribal groups. [/SIZE][/FONT]

http://hrw.org/backgrounder/wrd/iraq-women.htm

According to the United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO), as a result of the national literacy campaign, as of 1987 approximately 75 percent of Iraqi women were literate; however, by year-end 2000, Iraq had the lowest regional adult literacy levels, with the percentage of literate women at less than 25 percent.

Issues for women now = losing rights for choice in marriage, divorce, child custody, inheritence and travelling without a male family member. Women would now have to write into their marriage contract the right to work.

I bet they are just so thankful we came to help them! :( Was the system perfect before? Hell no. Is it better now? Hell no, its worse.

You're kidding, right? Democracy instead of cruel dictatorship is sickening? Freedom instead of oppression is sickening? Being allowed to have opinions instead of being gassed for complaining is sickening? I don't think so!

Maybe you should ask some of the Iraqi womens rights groups how they feel about this new found democracy (but do it quick because womens rights groups are being closed down regularly now as part of the al-hamlah al-imaniyyah (meaning campaign to enhance the Islamic faith).

Our actions have brought democracy to two countries that previously suffered oppression.

Does anything above sound like democracy?

What about Afghanistan?? You think we brought them democracy? This is by RAWA (Revolutionary Association of the Women of Afghanistan) and was written in March 2007:

The world came into motion in the name of "liberating Afghan woman" and our country was invaded, but the sorrows and deprivations of Afghan women has not just failed to reduce, but actually increased the level of oppression and brutality day by day on this most ruined population of our society.

If you want the truth, go ask the people living it. ;)
 
Upvote 0

Dilbert66

Free Member
Dec 2, 2007
8
0
I just can't understand what you are all going on about, this is all bull sh$t,
she needed a kick up the ar$e.

You have to ask the question IF she is bright enough to educate kids...in any country, if in a strict Muslim state she makes this sort of mistake. She may have education behind her but never did her homework before she left the UK.
Now the scaremongers and extremists are using this to wip up some sort of fear in people, this makes me angry because fear makes normal people do and say stupid things. So please sort your heads out and lets hope they dont send the her back here because with teachers like that we have no hope.:)
 
Upvote 0
M

Mortime Business Software

Dave wrote:
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
How come you cannot think of these other groups as just harmless teenagers doing what teenagers do?
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Sally wrote:
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Because I don't think of Islamic terrorists as teenagers doing what they do.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

How can you tell? How do you know that some of these over-zealous teenagers are not potential or actual terrorists? This is the problem Sally. Thankfully, our authorities have chosen the very sensible policy of erring on the side of caution.

Sally. You should calm down and take a little more time to think about what you say because you have contradicted yourself on more than one occasion.

Earlier you said that what some people are saying about Jews "shocked the hell out of you", and you called for their arrest.

But, even earlier, you made the following statement which strongly suggests that, in your opinion, the rebellious behaviour of muslim youngsters should be taken with a pinch of salt...

Sally wrote:
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
I know lots of young people that read them and shout about the taliban etc but when I suggest I will buy them a plane ticket to Afghanistan they tend to go quiet. That is what young people do, they rebel and generally have bugger all idea what they are rebelling against or getting into. What I doubt is whether any of them will ever do more than rant on the internet about it.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Why should you be shocked by some behaviour towards one group, yet be perfectly nonchalant about the same kind of behaviour towards another?

Dave wrote:
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Or are you such a military expert that you are confident that you can monitor all these potential murderers, and arrest them just at the point that they acquire their weapons?
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Sally wrote:
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
I hardly think personal insults are called for just because we disagree about this topic.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

It wasn't an insult. It was a serious question. The reason why I ask whether you are able to provide surveillance on these people, to a high enough standard to ensure the safety of all of us, is because earlier you asserted the following...

Sally wrote:
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
I was in the British military for a number of years so am perfectly aware of what I need to report and to whom.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

You seem to be implying that, because of your military experience, you know exactly when a harmless, loud-mouthed muslim teenager becomes a dangerous terrorist. Coupled with your opinion that no arrests of terrorists should be made until they are caught red handed with actual weapons, this suggests to me that you are able to provide sound surveillance which triggers action only at the point when a terrorist acquires weapons.

Sally. Although I believe you are essentially a good person, I regard your attitude and solutions as very dangerous.

I believe that it is inevitable that more people in this country are going to be killed by muslim terrorists. If your attitude is typical of muslims in this country, then I see no hope of winning their support in any meaningful way which can actually help to solve the problem.

Dave
 
Upvote 0

Wiggy

Free Member
Sep 11, 2007
373
49
This is a truly amazing thread. It is rare for the erudite members of this particular forum to spout such tommyrot [I love English, tommyrot-what a word]. Normally misinformation of this sort is the reserve of government spin doctors.

Some of the wilder suggestions:

Ignorance of the law is a viable defence. . .So nobody should be guilty of anything?. . ."Honest officer, I didn't know I needed a licence to drive this thing"

Terrorism is about religion. . .The first act of middle East terrorism that I am aware of was the bombing of the British Military HQ in Palestine by the 'Jewish Resistance' in 1946. [91 killed, mostly civilians]. Then as now, it was about politics and land. Not religion. [Incidentally, the terrorists got what they wanted-bad precedent]

Western Interference in the middle East is a force for good. . .We have interfered for our own political reasons and we have not yet had any success. We supported and armed the terrorists in Palestine and our record in Afghanistan is not great either. Iraq? Why not Turkey if we want to defend Kurds? Oh I forgot, no Oil. . .Nigeria looks ripe for western help though. . .

People, drop the spin, lose the agendas, study some history and form your own opinions! Some of these posts look like they were written by Washington spin doctors to be read by the Shrub to dumb Americans. . .

I love a good argument. . .This ain't one though. . .;)
 
Upvote 0
We have interfered for our own political reasons and we have not yet had any success. We supported and armed the terrorists in Palestine and our record in Afghanistan is not great either. Iraq? Why not Turkey if we want to defend Kurds? Oh I forgot, no Oil. . .Nigeria looks ripe for western help though. . .
I agree Wiggy - western intervention and oil seem to be bedfellows to me. (I could be wrong though)

I don't recall everyone racing over to Rwanda when a touch of genocide was happening.....
 
Upvote 0
Sally. You should calm down and take a little more time to think about what you say because you have contradicted yourself on more than one occasion.

If you go back and read my posts I think you will find that rather than me contradicting myself, you are in fact reading what you want to hear rather than what I am saying. I shall demonstrate:

Earlier you said that what some people are saying about Jews "shocked the hell out of you", and you called for their arrest.

My post is on page 15 but to save time this is a copy and paste:

and the things he told me goes on in this country against Jews shocked the hell out of me. So when are we going to start locking them up for thought crimes?

As you can see I did not say what some people are 'saying' about Jews. My question regarding locking them up was for you, the suggestion being that our country chooses not to lock these people up so why have they chosen to do so in this case.

You then made the assumption that hate filled acts by Muslims do not shock the hell out of me. Please try to read what I say, not what you think or assume I am saying.

Why should you be shocked by some behaviour towards one group, yet be perfectly nonchalant about the same kind of behaviour towards another?

Another assumption. Firstly I was not speaking about the same type of behaviour. I believe there is a line people should not cross and when they do I think they should be punished for it. Where we differ is where that line is.

You seem to be implying that, because of your military experience, you know exactly when a harmless, loud-mouthed muslim teenager becomes a dangerous terrorist.

I made no such assertion. What I said is that Muslims do keep an eye on their youth and when things look like they are getting out of hand then action is taken. Or would you prefer that the moment anyone says the word Jihad that they are whisked away to the police station? My comment about being in the military was because I do not think I am some innocent little old lady that thinks everyone is a good person deep down.

Quite why you think I hang out with bin Laden and co I really do not know. Let me give you an example, I joined a forum that was pressuring young people to believe that it was a sin to report other Muslims no matter what they do - the site was duly reported to the correct people so they could keep an eye on it and make an assessment as to what is going on. That is not my job or my responsibility but I do feel it is my duty not only to my country but also to the young people that are being led astray.

Coupled with your opinion that no arrests of terrorists should be made until they are caught red handed with actual weapons, this suggests to me that you are able to provide sound surveillance which triggers action only at the point when a terrorist acquires weapons.

What are you talking about? I am not a secret agent, I do not provide 'sound surveillance' on anyone. Would you prefer I just ignore the issue and go have a cup of tea? I am not responsible for that girls views but I happen to believe that when we start arresting people for thought crimes we are on a slippery slope.

Sally. Although I believe you are essentially a good person, I regard your attitude and solutions as very dangerous.

What solutions are you talking about? What solutions have I put forward, other than mental health care for the girl?
 
Upvote 0

Gillie

Free Member
Apr 12, 2006
13,065
1,463
North West England
This is a truly amazing thread. It is rare for the erudite members of this particular forum to spout such tommyrot [I love English, tommyrot-what a word]. Normally misinformation of this sort is the reserve of government spin doctors.

Some of the wilder suggestions:

Ignorance of the law is a viable defence. . .So nobody should be guilty of anything?. . ."Honest officer, I didn't know I needed a licence to drive this thing"

Terrorism is about religion. . .The first act of middle East terrorism that I am aware of was the bombing of the British Military HQ in Palestine by the 'Jewish Resistance' in 1946. [91 killed, mostly civilians]. Then as now, it was about politics and land. Not religion. [Incidentally, the terrorists got what they wanted-bad precedent]

So so wrong!!!
 
Upvote 0

Wiggy

Free Member
Sep 11, 2007
373
49
Are you implying that the fight for the state of Israel was about politics and not religion??

Yes, pretty much. The political situation at that time was that European Jews were not allowed [By the British authorities] to migrate into Palestine in numbers that they found satisfactory. Like anywhere else, [apart from Britain under Labour :D] there was an immigration policy. That particular act of terrorism was part of the struggle to change that policy. Religion tends to be the carrot or stick used to motivate the faithful but anything to do with land, borders and immigration is politics.
 
Upvote 0

cjd

Business Member
  • Nov 23, 2005
    15,982
    3,423
    www.voipfone.co.uk
    Then as now, it was about politics and land. Not religion.

    There's no difference in the middle east between politics, religion, land and power.

    And religion has only very recently not been an overt and very real force in western politics, particularly Catholicism.

    We still have blasphemy laws on our statute books - the main difference between ours and theirs is that they use them the way we did in the 17th century.

    Suicide bombers may well be killing themsleves for political reasons but with the religious promise of going to heaven to sit at the right hand of god there is no way they would do it.
     
    Upvote 0

    dave_n

    Free Member
    Oct 27, 2007
    2,842
    272
    Lancashire
    Upvote 0
    Good find Chris, I liked this bit:

    Naved Siddiqi, a spokesman for the Islamic Society of Britain, said: “Adam and Mohammed are only names. The irony is that if the Prophet had seen what Gillian’s class did, he would have probably laughed. The Sudanese government have clearly used the issue as a political football.”

    I feel very sad for her, she seems to genuinely love living in Sudan.

    As for the author, I do wish he hadn't changed the name, it gives weight to these crazy peoples ideas.
     
    Upvote 0
    M

    Mortime Business Software

    Wiggy wrote:
    ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
    Ignorance of the law is a viable defence. . .So nobody should be guilty of anything?. . ."Honest officer, I didn't know I needed a licence to drive this thing"
    ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

    I assume you mean that Mrs. Gibbons should have told the children that they cannot name their teddy Mohammed.

    I'm sort of with you there because I would expect a Christian teacher in Britain to teach children that objects should not be called Jesus.

    On the other hand, it may depend on how much experience of religion Mrs. Gibbons has had.

    I'm not saying there is anything wrong with calling an object Jesus (or Mohammed for that matter). I think my personal reluctance to do so would be because I am probably still somewhat conditioned by my 12 years of catholic schooling, and so calling a teddy, or a pet, or a baby, Jesus, is just not on, even though I am now a total non-believer.

    To me, it seems to degrade the status of a god, whilst endowing upon the bearer of the name an undeserved sublimeness.

    However, the commotion that this has caused is really just ridiculous, and the Sudanese individuals who are responsible should be very embarrassed. This should have gone no further than the head-teacher of the school.

    Dave
     
    Upvote 0
    M

    Mortime Business Software

    Sally wrote:
    ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
    Where we differ is where that line is.
    ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

    We certainly do.

    You think it is where a terrorist has actually acquired weapons and is on the virge of committing murder, whereas just about everybody else, and most importantly, including the relevant authorities, think it is safer to act well before that point.

    This is why your attitudes, and your *solution* - to arrest terrorist suspects only when they possess weapons and are probably about to commit murder - is very dangerous.

    Sally wrote:
    ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
    That is not my job or my responsibility but I do feel it is my duty not only to my country but also to the young people that are being led astray.
    ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

    Isn't this the kind of behaviour that I said I expected from you, but that you strongly implied should be taken with a pinch of salt? Well done.

    Tell me Sally, which group do think formed the audience at that site? Could it possibly have been your harmless, rebellious, muslim teenagers?

    This is why your attitudes, and your *solution* - to take the rantings of those harmless, rebellious teenagers with a pinch of salt - is very dangerous.

    Dave
     
    Upvote 0

    Wiggy

    Free Member
    Sep 11, 2007
    373
    49
    Wiggy wrote:
    ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
    Ignorance of the law is a viable defence. . .So nobody should be guilty of anything?. . ."Honest officer, I didn't know I needed a licence to drive this thing"
    ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

    I assume you mean that Mrs. Gibbons should have told the children that they cannot name their teddy Mohammed.

    I'm sort of with you there because I would expect a Christian teacher in Britain to teach children that objects should not be called Jesus.

    On the other hand, it may depend on how much experience of religion Mrs. Gibbons has had.

    Dave

    My point was more to the effect that people need to know the law of the land where they are. It just so happens that in Sudan this is religious law. . .
    If a Brit was living in Chicago and was jailed for publicly defacing an American flag [Only a felony in Illinois, misdemeanor in most other states] I would have little sympathy for them. . .
    When I moved to the UK, the leatherman that had lived on my hip for the previous 20 years was consigned to the toolbox in deference to UK law that prohibits carrying any pocket knife with blades that lock or exceed 3 inches. . .I won't even mention the shotgun on the back seat :D

    I couldn't agree more that the whole thing is ridiculous. . .
     
    Upvote 0
    Ah yes the peaceful countries of Israel and Afghanistan!!
    And here we see the extraordinary power of the press. Because Israel and Afghanistan are democratic countries, the press has more freedom. They report everything that goes on, daily, and we read about it. A single death in Afghanistan, for example, trumps thousands dying in a closed country such as Sudan. This leads us to believe they are violent countries. In the total scheme of things, they are not. I've travelled to many countries that are supposedly violent. Real life is often very different from what is portrayed on TV. But I don't need to tell you that: You've lived in Egypt so you know the phenomenon very well.

    I bet they are just so thankful we came to help them! :( Was the system perfect before? Hell no. Is it better now? Hell no, its worse.
    This is a mind-boggling statement. The cruel regime of Saddam was better than a democratic country? Hospitals and schools where they did not exist before makes the country worse? As you pointed out in another context, we're dependent on the media for our window into a country, and they have an agenda - namely, point out everything that's bad. Instead, I've listened to reports from people who've been there, and they are far more optimistic.

    Maybe you should ask some of the Iraqi womens rights groups how they feel about this new found democracy
    This points out the importance of having a constitution as well as a democracy - to prevent the majority imposing its will on the minorities. Everyone deserves rights enshrined into law. The leaders who were elected by the people chose to incorporate many aspects of their faith in the new constitution (I've read the Iraqi constitution, and the first line refers to an Islamic government). Maybe, over time, they'll see that this restricts the rights of women.

    Anyone whose candidate loses an election feels they are worse off. That's part and parcel of democracy. :)
     
    Upvote 0
    M

    Mortime Business Software

    Wiggy wrote:
    ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
    . . .I won't even mention the shotgun on the back seat
    ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

    And what about that container full of fertiliser - *farmer* Wiggy?! I suppose that's for growing hair is it? ;)

    Dave
     
    Upvote 0

    Wiggy

    Free Member
    Sep 11, 2007
    373
    49
    Wiggy wrote:
    ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
    . . .I won't even mention the shotgun on the back seat
    ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

    And what about that container full of fertiliser - *farmer* Wiggy?! I suppose that's for growing hair is it? ;)

    Dave

    Pity you missed the knees-up. . .There was an abundance of hair. . .Don't need fertiliser when you is wiggy. . .'sides fertiliser is legal both sides of the pond. . .
     
    Upvote 0
    You think it is where a terrorist has actually acquired weapons and is on the virge of committing murder,

    That is not what I said at all. In this thread I have supported arresting and imprisoning the guys that came to Cumbria to train and all they had were sticks but they were actively moving toward violence not just shouting their mouth off.

    I am not defending her lunacy in any way but to me there is a distinct difference between the guys that ran around woods training and a crazy girl writing disgusting poetry.

    The girls name is Samina Malik, please google and find me anything that says she tried to pay money to a terrorist organisation. On my god I forgot, she had a bracelet with the word jihad on it - quick lock her up. So what she was arrested for was scribbling hatred on pieces of paper, posting offensive poetry and downloading information that is freely available to anyone with an internet connection. Perhps what we should be doing is stopping people having free access to this information?

    It seems I am not as isolated in my thinking as you think:

    http://www.guardian.co.uk/terrorism/story/0,,2208808,00.html

    http://www.spectator.co.uk/the-maga...speech.thtml?gclid=CKiWgbe0jJACFQhCMAodGBWslQ

    Some interesting comments on the bottom blog, from both of our views.
     
    Upvote 0

    Subbynet

    Free Member
    Aug 1, 2005
    6,000
    1,101
    44
    Luton
    Originally Posted by Sally@CC
    I am so happy for her, her family and that it was Muslims that stepped up to the plate for her. :D:D

    and that the British government did what it took to get her out.

    Exactly Steve,

    Sally, I have to say i think your faith holds far to much influence over how you see the world and the decisions you make. Especially where you apply blame and praise, or the lack of it.

    Anyone else would have gave the government credit - you gave it to a religion.

    It wasn't Muslims, it was progressive British Muslims along with and from the democratic British government which helped her. Progressive because they know it was madness, and medieval to prosecute her for such a trivial thing. They practice their faith, not preach it.

    Fancy ignoring the all the Muslims on the Streets of Sudan calling for her to die to come out with that statement of so called Muslim solidarity! :(
     
    Upvote 0

    Subbynet

    Free Member
    Aug 1, 2005
    6,000
    1,101
    44
    Luton
    I am not defending her lunacy in any way but to me there is a distinct difference between the guys that ran around woods training and a crazy girl writing disgusting poetry.

    You are clearly defending her and purposely not tying all the evidence together.

    The names used
    - Lyrical Terrorist
    The things she wrote - extremist poems praising Osama Bin Laden, supporting martyrdom and discussing beheading. "How to Behead" and "Beheading - How it Feels".
    The books she read - a "library" of extreme Islamist literature in her bedroom including The Al-Qaeda Manual and The Mujahideen Poisons Handbook.
    The Till Receipt -
    a WH Smith till receipt: "The desire within me increases every day to go for martyrdom."
    The people she spoke too - the court heard, on an online social networking group known as Hi-5 she listed her interests as "helping the mujahideen any way I can" and, in the section for her favourite TV shows, she entered "watching videos by Muslim brothers in Iraq, yep, the beheading ones."
    The money she tried to donate - Metropolitan Police Counter Terrorism Command, said: "Malik held violent extremist views which she shared with other like-minded people over the internet. She also tried to donate money to a terrorist group.

    All on the BBC website. http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/7085889.stm http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/7084801.stm

    If thats the normal actions of a 23 yr old Muslim girl I'm deeply worried.
     
    Upvote 0
    M

    Mortime Business Software

    Dave wrote:
    ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
    You think it [the point at which we arrest suspects] is where a terrorist has actually acquired weapons and is on the virge of committing murder,
    ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

    Sally wrote:
    ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
    That is not what I said at all.
    ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

    So what did you mean when you said the following?:

    Sally wrote:
    ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
    They become evil scum when they take action and not until. When they go and start buying the materials to kill people or go off to a training camp.
    ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

    Okay. So the point at which you would arrest a terrorist suspect is "when they go and start buying the materials to kill people"? Is that right?

    Sally. How many times do I have say this? Just about everyone of sound mind, including the relevant authorities, think that they should be arrested well before they acquire their weapons.

    Sorry, but I have to regard anyone who "...go and start buying the materials to kill people", as being on the virge of committing murder. We cannot, and will not, if it is within our power, allow a terrorist to get this far.

    Sally wrote:
    ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
    Until then they are stupid dreamers with an inferiority complex. Prior to her ranting about Jihad she used to rap and write about anarchy.
    ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

    I would say that just about anyone of sound mind, including the relevant authorities, are not interested in your psychoanalyses. They cannot afford to be. We just want them locked up before innocent people are slaughtered.

    In my opinion, if any of your harmless, rebellious, muslim teenagers are caught "ranting" about anything which the authorities deem untoward, then they should be locked up.

    Dave
     
    Upvote 0
    It wasn't Muslims, it was progressive British Muslims

    Sorry did you just say it wasn't Muslims, it was Muslims? Do you think British Muslims belong to a different faith?

    3 pages ago people were saying that Muslims must speak up and say we do not accept this. Then when they do and I congratulate them for it, I am totally biased because of my faith. But you think they only did it because they are British and a different sort of Muslim :|

    Is it beyond you just to say 'good, that is a step in the right direction'?

    Fancy ignoring the all the Muslims on the Streets of Sudan calling for her to die to come out with that statement of so called Muslim solidarity! :(

    70% of Sudan is Muslim, there are over 3 million living in Khartoum and the suburbs. The FO said that approx 1000 people demonstrated on Friday. Maybe the other 2 million Muslims were too busy washing their hair?

    Can we have a little perspective here please.
     
    Upvote 0
    They become evil scum when they take action and not until. When they go and start buying the materials to kill people or go off to a training camp.

    Ask yourself why you bothered to copy and paste my words as follows:

    or go off to a training camp

    then totally ignore that (bearing in mind I have talked numerous times about the guys that came to Cumbria and trained with sticks) and then say:

    Okay. So the point at which you would arrest a terrorist suspect is "when they go and start buying the materials to kill people"? Is that right?

    Now answer your own question. Is that what I said? Is that what you copied and pasted above?

    I think not but for some reason you are determined to ignore half of what I say in order to make your point.
     
    Upvote 0
    We could go round and round in circles with this.

    I would like to thank Sally for her input - to me it is great to have the perspective of a British Muslim who lives in Egypt on this thread.

    I hope you ain't feeling too isolated on this Sal.

    I feel we should also all be careful to be respectful of each others beliefs and viewpoints - of which there will always be many - especially where religion is involved.

    I for one will never understand extremism - a view I am sure we pretty much all share.

    And to me that is what this thread is really about :)
     
    Upvote 0
    The money she tried to donate - Metropolitan Police Counter Terrorism Command, said: "Malik held violent extremist views which she shared with other like-minded people over the internet. She also tried to donate money to a terrorist group.


    If you go back quite a few posts you will see that I said I had not seen anything about her trying to donate money and that if I did it may change my views of the case, as that crosses the line. Bt I do not think poetry crosses the same line.


    If thats the normal actions of a 23 yr old Muslim girl I'm deeply worried.

    I repeat again - the girl clearly has mental health problems.
     
    Upvote 0

    ken_uk

    Free Member
    Jul 27, 2007
    2,213
    240
    55
    Sally, the information about her trying to pay to a terrorist group has been on this thread since my reply on page 8, I qouted it, and even gave the source so it could be verified. Its not like its hard to find, either in the thread, or on google. I found it in seconds?
     
    Upvote 0

    Latest Articles