Exit Plan

JEREMY HAWKE

Business Member
  • Business Listing
    Mar 4, 2008
    8,675
    1
    4,106
    EXETER DEVON
    www.jeremyhawkecourier.co.uk
    An exit plan is a strategy that a director or directors, owner or major shareholders have in place to dispose of the business in a profitable way after the company has done well. Walking away in the future with a reasonable sum in their pockets is the basic part of the exit plan

    Start ups have more than enough effort to put in on their new project . They are at the stage that they don't know if the business is going to break even or make a loss It may even make a profit

    I am at a loss to understand why many of those advising are advising to make an exit plan at this very early stage in the formation of the business
    I have noticed on another thread that a person with a business plan now has his head ticking over fast after another member has told him he needs an exit plan . Well this not important at this early stage despite what others may say .
    If your a new start up or working on your business plan Focus only on what is important Exits plans will waste your time an energy in the planning stages
     
    Your exit plan can fundamentally impact how you structure and grow your business

    Investors will definitely want to know about it - it’s how they make their money

    If your plan is just to make a living for you and your family, well and good. But make it a plan not just a default.
     
    Upvote 0
    Your exit plan can fundamentally impact how you structure and grow your business

    Investors will definitely want to know about it - it’s how they make their money

    If your plan is just to make a living for you and your family, well and good. But make it a plan not just a default.

    An investor has no interest in your exit plan. An investor has an interest in his or her ROI and their exit plan from the investment once they have made what they want from it. Should you agree a time scale for the investment .
    People on here also need to understand that in the real world of business 99% of companies don't actually go to investors for funding .
    It is important that advice from this site is as relevant ,accurate and as helpful as possible We don't want to be labelled as a" bunch of know norts "
     
    Upvote 0
    An exit plan also lays down strategy for winding up a business which fails. How to get out with minimal damage, so to speak. Too many failing start ups continue well past their 'sell by date' and end up with huge debts to other traders and HMRC.
     
    Upvote 0
    An exit plan also lays down strategy for winding up a business which fails. How to get out with minimal damage, so to speak. Too many failing start ups continue well past their 'sell by date' and end up with huge debts to other traders and HMRC.

    I agree with that Mr Fox you may want a contingency plan that you probably would not want to include in a business plan but you might form such a plan
     
    Upvote 0
    An investor has no interest in your exit plan. An investor has an interest in his or her ROI and their exit plan from the investment once they have made what they want from it. Should you agree a time scale for the investment .
    People on here also need to understand that in the real world of business 99% of companies don't actually go to investors for funding .
    It is important that advice from this site is as relevant ,accurate and as helpful as possible We don't want to be labelled as a" bunch of know norts "

    Serious investors look for a clear exit strategy to make the best return on their investment. If the owner hasn't planned that they won't get investment

    As someone who speaks with business owners on a daily basis, I'd say that 70% of them 'dream' of a glamorous exit such as floatation.

    You are correct that very few will ever achieve it because they haven't structured the business to be remotely attractive to buyers or or investors - in fact in many cases the 'business' lies entirely in their head.

    Simple fact - If you aim to attract investors, float a business or make a worthwhile trade sale, you need to plan that into your business

    Otherwise you will almost certainly default to family business.
     
    Upvote 0
    OK Mark maybe I'm siding with you a bit
    You use the words Dream and glamourous My question is where are people getting these ideas that make them formulate such
    Is it something that popular media feeds them and maybe this is the route of my frustrations at the end of the day as Exit plan is used in various things that are widely accessible
     
    Upvote 0
    It's only the naive and stupid who seek funds from the market without fully appreciating that, unlike them, investors aren't in there "for life". Investors want to get in at a point where shares are cheap, benefit from dividends for a bit (perhaps) and then get out.

    The get out is very, very important.

    The big return for investors is not from the paltry 8% or 10% or even 20% return you're promising in your "timescale". No, even 20% is a chicken sh*t return for the high risks involved with startup & early stage investments. Most investors are looking for percentages in the three digits - usually several hundred per cent. And you only get that when selling your shares.

    If you haven't got an exit plan then what you're telling the investor is that when, 3 years or 5 years down the road, he wants to liquidate his investment - or needs to get his money back for some personal reasons - he'll have no route to selling his shares ie. he's stuck with you and has to take whatever you choose to offer him.

    An exit plan is a strategy that a director or directors, owner or major shareholders have in place to dispose of the business in a profitable way after the company has done well. Walking away in the future with a reasonable sum in their pockets is the basic part of the exit plan
    That's not it at all. An exit plan shows a clear route to an equity event where the investor has the option of getting his money back complete with a decent return for the risk he has taken. It's not about the founder leaving, it's about an opportunity where investors finally get liquidity.

    But even if you aren't looking for outside investment - and aren't seeking to leave in x number of years - you'd still be wise to have a sound exit plan in place as it keeps you maintaining the right records and it demonstrates to partners (bank / factoring company / suppliers / whoever else asks) that you're got your head screwed on right, that you're aiming for high growth, that you're focused on building a company that others will see as valuable!
     
    Last edited:
    Upvote 0
    interesting thread and I agree on the comment that 99% of business's do not seek outside investment so a large majority of readers here are likely not getting valuable information from discussions like this which discuss start ups in the sense of some digital business with exponential growth potential.

    The End is something I as a small business owner think about a fair bit, mainly as I do not know what happens at the end. Posters mention selling the business and stuff like that but is that the only option?

    What about this scenario?

    Business A operating for 15 years and has say (example) 500k in the bank and owner wants to walk away, stock is minimal and mostly all sold off and most of assets are liquid.

    What would be the process if they did not find a buyer and simply wanted to walk away?
     
    Upvote 0
    An investor has no interest in your exit plan. An investor has an interest in his or her ROI and their exit plan from the investment once they have made what they want from it. Should you agree a time scale for the investment .
    People on here also need to understand that in the real world of business 99% of companies don't actually go to investors for funding .
    It is important that advice from this site is as relevant ,accurate and as helpful as possible We don't want to be labelled as a" bunch of know norts "

    This simply isn't true, at least in pharmaceuticals. Small pharma companies will go through funding rounds which will usually give them enough cashflow for a year or so until the next funding round. Every time the investors will be thinking about their exit which in most cases will be trying to snare the likes of GSK, Roche, Astra Zeneca etc. Whether the company is making much of a profit in terms of dividends isn't really the main focus of the investors, they're looking at how their £100,000 investment can be turned into £5m when big pharma buys them out.
     
    Upvote 0
    Business A operating for 15 years and has say (example) 500k in the bank and owner wants to walk away, stock is minimal and mostly all sold off and most of assets are liquid.

    What would be the process if they did not find a buyer and simply wanted to walk away?

    Even walking away is best done as part of a well thought out plan. It ensures maximum benefits and minimum tax. In the above case he'd pull out £500K in dividends and pay a whacking 45% in additional rate tax.

    If he had planned the exit he could have walked away paying just 10% in tax - a difference of a not insignificant six figure sum.

    It's quite simply stupid in the extreme to not plan for the exit. And that applies to every business. Should something happen to the business owner - getting ill or dying - then all the value he has built in the business will likely get flushed down the toilet. If, however, he has an exit plan in place - and therefore all the right processes, documents, records, information - it is easier for the family to sell the business (or just the assets) and extract value.

    The wooden box plan - the business dies when I die - is not smart and does not benefit the people the business owner is working so hard to provide for.

    I don't provide exit planning advice, but remember all those business owners you mention who never want to sell their business? The majority of them will come to people like me at some point in the coming years to say they want to sell their business.
     
    • Like
    Reactions: mtools and ffox
    Upvote 0
    I do not recall mentioning many owners not wanting to sell their business. So are you saying to draw the funds out in a planned periodic manner whilst trading would be the best process for a company not wishing to sell?

    Ok so let's stick with the example of Business A. 500k in bank and wants to sell. Has annual T/O of aproximately 375k per annum and say (example) 50k net proot PA. Per year for say 10 years.

    In some instances is it really the best way to maximise value through sale or is the other method of "winding down" with planned exit a better option sometimes?
     
    Upvote 0
    interesting thread and I agree on the comment that 99% of business's do not seek outside investment so a large majority of readers here are likely not getting valuable information from discussions like this which discuss start ups in the sense of some digital business with exponential growth potential.

    The End is something I as a small business owner think about a fair bit, mainly as I do not know what happens at the end. Posters mention selling the business and stuff like that but is that the only option?

    What about this scenario?

    Business A operating for 15 years and has say (example) 500k in the bank and owner wants to walk away, stock is minimal and mostly all sold off and most of assets are liquid.

    What would be the process if they did not find a buyer and simply wanted to walk away?

    The exit plan does not need to be in place on start up it needs to be strategized at year 10 !
    He wont know on start up what will be in the bank or if the company will even be trading at year 15 but he would have a good idea by year 10 !
     
    Upvote 0
    So are you saying to draw the funds out in a planned periodic manner whilst trading would be the best process for a company not wishing to sell?
    Exit is not the same as sale. Even succession planning - training the kid to take over - is a plan for the owner's exit ie. an exit plan.

    The exit plan does not need to be in place on start up it needs to be strategized at year 10 !
    Yeah, had one of those yesterday! Asked him if he had board resolutions to cover some major changes that occurred 8 years ago. His reply? "I wasn't planning on selling eight years ago so didn't write up and file formal resolutions!"

    But that's one of the million things buyers ask through due diligence and if you don't have the right documentation you could end up losing all buyers after you've spent £50K on business broker / intermediary fees to attract the buyers in the first place.

    To ensure a smooth process, a better chance of sale and a better price you need to think of an exit plan before you even start! Like a shareholders agreement. Buyers will want to see one. And if you try drawing it up in year 10 you'll often find that shareholders can't agree terms!

    If you think about the exit before starting the business you'll likely inspect that lease agreement in more detail and study the assignment clause, you'll avoid giving PGs out to all and sundry etc etc. These are the kind of things that scupper deals and which can't be easily changed in year 10.
     
    Upvote 0
    Exit is not the same as sale. Even succession planning - training the kid to take over - is a plan for the owner's exit ie. an exit plan.


    Yeah, had one of those yesterday! Asked him if he had board resolutions to cover some major changes that occurred 8 years ago. His reply? "I wasn't planning on selling eight years ago so didn't write up and file formal resolutions!"

    But that's one of the million things buyers ask through due diligence and if you don't have the right documentation you could end up losing all buyers after you've spent £50K on business broker / intermediary fees to attract the buyers in the first place.

    To ensure a smooth process, a better chance of sale and a better price you need to think of an exit plan before you even start! Like a shareholders agreement. Buyers will want to see one. And if you try drawing it up in year 10 you'll often find that shareholders can't agree terms!

    If you think about the exit before starting the business you'll likely inspect that lease agreement in more detail and study the assignment clause, you'll avoid giving PGs out to all and sundry etc etc. These are the kind of things that scupper deals and which can't be easily changed in year 10.

    But you more than anybody else would push this in the same way that I say You should only use a same day courier !
     
    Upvote 0
    As I said earlier, I don't provide exit advice or services.

    I simply deal with a variety of businesses some of which have planned for an exit and some which haven't. I know which ones are more likely to sell and to get a good price.

    In fact, the ones which haven't planned are better clients because they end up paying me a lot more in fees! ;)
     
    Upvote 0
    Personally an exit plan to me, is planning to exit the business.

    Whether that's selling up at a certain price, or retiring at a certain age.

    I need to plan for my dad exiting the business when he retires. Pay his DLA off, get staff in place to replace him, and generate enough money to fund it, along with the option to buy him out. :rolleyes:

    Whilst we never gave it a though 4+ years ago, perhaps we should have. But that is my situation, if I was starting up myself, I'd want to know at what point you draw a line and admit it's not working, rather than chucking more money and time at it?
     
    Upvote 0
    The best time to start an exit plan is before you start the business. But any time is better than waiting to the point where you want to or, worse, need to sell.

    Go pay a good exit planner to look at this business in some depth and advise on planning for the exit. Or, if it's a micro business (under £1m in t/o, for example), that wouldn't be economical so ...just buy a few good books on the subject and get down to some serious reading (and then a lot of work to sort out whatever needs sorting).

    <added>Typo on my previous post. It should read "I don't provide exit planning advice or services"
     
    Last edited:
    Upvote 0
    We've an idea what we want to do. Our accountant is great and knows our aim, which helps.

    I suppose our set up is fairly normal, we're not a huge company, and we're not selling to a 3rd party. Still we need to have a plan to get there.
     
    Upvote 0
    Denial of the value of any part of a comprehensive business plan plays into the idea that a plan's only or main use is to show to potential investors/funders. Nothing could be further from the truth.

    The main benefit of writing a business plan is that it forces you to go through the planning process itself; considering opportunities, risks, rewards, contingencies and, critically, "what ifs." Done properly, it does enable a robust presentation to potential investors, but it does this by providing evidence that the thinking has been done.

    Paradoxically, the businesses that would benefit most from proper planning are overwhelmingly the ones who don't plan. That is, SME's and micro-businesses. In larger businesses the margins for error are usually wide. I once had a client who was the financial director of a large subsidiary of Unilever. He described his monthly management accounting accuracy of plus or minus £1million profit as being "close enough"! But try running a small business where you're a few hundred pounds short of covering the wages tomorrow and you'll realise what squeaky-bum time feels like. Yet it's not rocket science to run a rolling cashflow forecast based on reasonable estimates of forward sales, margins and costs. It takes about a day or two to set up and usually around an hour a day to maintain, and can provide a solid basis and the motivation to work up a list of the issues that need further forward planning.

    The vast majority of SME owners that I've met - and I mean 90% and more - deny the benefit of planning because it's "too time consuming/unreliable/meaningless, because things change all the time". What they really mean is that they don't have the necessary skills, or they're too lazy, or they're too busy working in the business rather than on the business, which is what the boss should spend most of his/her time doing.

    Being "investment ready" (i.e. in a format that investors demand, including exit plan) isn't necessary for most of the time and for some businesses might never be necessary. But a handwritten plan covering the important bases that's looked at and worked on for a few hours a week or even a few hours a month should be one of a boss's top priorities.
     
    • Like
    Reactions: mtools and ffox
    Upvote 0
    Wertschöpfung!

    As much as all this talk of 'Exit Strategy' makes sense for the UK and US ways of doing business, let me introduce you to another concept that deliberately avoids and prevents any exit by the owners.

    The German family company is not quite what outsiders think it is. You may be thinking of the local electrician, car dealer, widget maker, or other proud members of the 'Mittlestand' - medium sized companies, up to about 500 employees.

    Firstly, the German family business can be a vast enterprise. BMW, Miele, Aldi, Lidl and Bauer Media spring to mind - multi billion dollar international enterprises.

    Secondly, these companies have planned for succession (so, for the founder, a personal exit strategy) but the families remain closely tied to the company. Often, not because they want that, but because the founder set up a series of legal devices that make the company and its properties only of value to his or her family. Typically, covenants on land, buildings and shareholdings, such as forbidding the use of real estate as collateral for debt, only family members can own shares and the use of convoluted, interlocking trusts, combined with commercial companies.

    If outside investment is sought, the founding articles will often stipulate how many family members must be on the board and even give them the deciding vote (e.g. BMW).

    US companies in particular, are very fond of going for an IPO at the first possible opportunity. Cash-in, run-in, get-out! Retire rich! My experience of these people and their ultimate fate, is that, unless the sums involved run into billions, the money is soon gone. If the founder doesn't blow it all on Scottish castles and South Sea islands, his heirs soon will!

    The founder of the average German family company is all too aware of this tendency of his or her progeny to develop a premature yearning for S-Class Mercedes and yachts on the Med. They realise that future generations may want to expand the business through debt, rather than dedication and diligence.

    The magic word is 'Wertschöpfung' (the creation of value).

    It usually takes a few generations to create a major company and at first, without loading the company with heavy debt, progress will be slow. The advantage is, whatever kills off your indebted competition, leaves you relatively unscathed. Road-works on the High Street kills off footfall - the competition in a rented shop fails to pay the rent and is gone. The competition in a mortgaged shop fails to pay the mortgage and has to refinance and survives a few months longer. But one more thing and they are dead as well.

    By adhering to the principles of Wertschöpfung, you are reducing risk.

    However - the one giant risk that a strategy of Wertschöpfung cannot cover, is future generations not adhering to the principles of Wertschöpfung. They may do things like take on debt or outside investment. Most of the time, that heralds failure or a total loss of control. Your family has lost the company, in exchange for flash cars and a big house. Add another generation and your heirs are right back to where you started and all that work was wasted.

    The only way you can prevent that and take care of future generations, is to actively prevent an exit strategy, by means of covenants and trusts.

    Of course, the principles of Wertschöpfung ain't for everybody - especially if you don't really care for your heirs that much, or you don't see much of a long-term future for the market you are in. If that is the case, as the man said, prepare that exit strategy!

    (And for those of you playing the 'Home Game', you may remember that I outlined in another thread, the basics of 'Aldifizierung' (Aldifying the market) which is a whole branch of retail economics. Wertschöpfung is very much a component in that business model.)
     
    • Like
    Reactions: Clinton
    Upvote 0
    All very interesting but not much relevance for the OP? And it's becoming less and less common even in the Mittelstand. A few years ago I consulted to a German multi-national of about £40million turnover where the owner had died and the directors and their distributors were trying to stop his daughter selling out to a US predator. Even though the founder had tied everything up in the way you describe, she found ways around it. Their distributor network were appalled because the founder had assured them for years that he'd made sure it couldn't happen. In their dismay a lot of them told me that it was more and more common throughout the MS.
     
    • Like
    Reactions: ffox
    Upvote 0
    1. I never said that it was a growing trend. Just a model to be used or not used, as you feel fit.

    2. More and more German companies are building themselves on debt. Delinquent business debt is a growing problem. The dismay that you report is growing and of course, suppliers and the unions are less likely to want to help such companies in times of economic stress.

    3. Many UK and US companies are adopting this model.

    4. Aldi, Lidl, Meile, Bauer and even the giant Berlesmann are witness to the validity of this model. It does not mean that other models are invalid. My previous company was a get-in, get-out deal. My present company is 100% following the Wertschöpfung model. What is right for one set of circumstances, is not necessarily right for others!
     
    Upvote 0
    I have come across a few companies around the world where the family later come and work for the company that is family owned.
    The ones I am thinking of all have similar policies, the directors do not join the company as teenagers. They get themselves educated, they get jobs elsewhere and build up experience outside the company. Then perhaps in their 30s or 40s join the family business if there is a role they can fulfil or can be trained on.
    Advantage of over time bringing in different experience, different ideas, different ways of working.
    No idea if any of them use debt, not of interest to me. One of my projects is considering parts of such governance models.
     
    Upvote 0
    Secondly, these companies have planned for succession (so, for the founder, a personal exit strategy) but the families remain closely tied to the company.
    I know more sons of farmers who hate the job of farming than who take on the family business with pleasure. Their main problem is that they only get to change from a low wage farm labourer to running the business in their fifties or sixties.
     
    Upvote 0
    Denial of the value of any part of a comprehensive business plan plays into the idea that a plan's only or main use is to show to potential investors/funders. Nothing could be further from the truth.

    The main benefit of writing a business plan is that it forces you to go through the planning process itself; considering opportunities, risks, rewards, contingencies and, critically, "what ifs." Done properly, it does enable a robust presentation to potential investors, but it does this by providing evidence that the thinking has been done.

    Paradoxically, the businesses that would benefit most from proper planning are overwhelmingly the ones who don't plan. That is, SME's and micro-businesses. In larger businesses the margins for error are usually wide. I once had a client who was the financial director of a large subsidiary of Unilever. He described his monthly management accounting accuracy of plus or minus £1million profit as being "close enough"! But try running a small business where you're a few hundred pounds short of covering the wages tomorrow and you'll realise what squeaky-bum time feels like. Yet it's not rocket science to run a rolling cashflow forecast based on reasonable estimates of forward sales, margins and costs. It takes about a day or two to set up and usually around an hour a day to maintain, and can provide a solid basis and the motivation to work up a list of the issues that need further forward planning.

    The vast majority of SME owners that I've met - and I mean 90% and more - deny the benefit of planning because it's "too time consuming/unreliable/meaningless, because things change all the time". What they really mean is that they don't have the necessary skills, or they're too lazy, or they're too busy working in the business rather than on the business, which is what the boss should spend most of his/her time doing.

    Being "investment ready" (i.e. in a format that investors demand, including exit plan) isn't necessary for most of the time and for some businesses might never be necessary. But a handwritten plan covering the important bases that's looked at and worked on for a few hours a week or even a few hours a month should be one of a boss's top priorities.

    100% agree with this. I have a spreadsheet all the way through to February 2019 with all my projected expenditures and my estimated bank balance at the end of each month, including all tax and VAT payments, as well as dividends, nothing worse than squeaky bum time when you're getting into your overdraft! I try to underestimate sales and overestimate costs as well. I've also found that trying to reduce costs is easier than trying to increase sales! Wish someone had told me that 5 years ago!
     
    Upvote 0
    An exit strategy will impact on what you do in the business from day one. Particularly on things such as pensions and remuneration.
     
    Upvote 0
    Three cheers for mtools!

    I'll wager that thousands of SME's in Carillion's upstream and downstream supply chain wish they'd had their cashflow projected forward in this way. And before anyone says "what good would it do to have a cashflow forecast with something like Carillion" just remember that when a crisis like that happens, speed can be of the essence. A cashflow forecast enables you to do "what ifs" at the touch of a button, and if you find yourself having to plan for awkward conversations with lenders, HMRC and suppliers, being able to show them that you have visibility of your forward cash position can make all the difference between getting their support or not.
     
    Upvote 0
    Three cheers for mtools!

    I'll wager that thousands of SME's in Carillion's upstream and downstream supply chain wish they'd had their cashflow projected forward in this way. And before anyone says "what good would it do to have a cashflow forecast with something like Carillion" just remember that when a crisis like that happens, speed can be of the essence. A cashflow forecast enables you to do "what ifs" at the touch of a button, and if you find yourself having to plan for awkward conversations with lenders, HMRC and suppliers, being able to show them that you have visibility of your forward cash position can make all the difference between getting their support or not.

    This is more to do with credit management than anything else
    These companies gave their customer 4 months credit ! :eek:
    Not many companies on here would offer anybody four months credit
     
    Upvote 0

    Latest Articles