Nothing about consultant's time in that equation...Value of PPC expert = Increase in profit + value of time saved (from the business owner not doing the work) - fee
Value + Value - Cost
Upvote
0
Nothing about consultant's time in that equation...Value of PPC expert = Increase in profit + value of time saved (from the business owner not doing the work) - fee
Nothing about consultant's time in that equation...
Fee does not necessarily relate to consultant's time."-fee".
I'm not sure what point you're trying to make.
Steve
, does someone really need 10,000 hours experience in order to be better than a business owner with zero hours experience?
Seeing as all SEO's/PPC guys have this claim that their the best in the world
So some PPC dude gets lucky with the keywords the prospect gives them, well, seems to me the prospect has just done the job of an PPC agent by choosing the correct keywords..... darn, he just saved himself a fee
The number of times Ive been asked what keywords I want for a campaign, I could have killed them
Fee does not necessarily relate to consultant's time.
My point goes back to Chris's post. He seems to think everyone should be paid average salary. My point is that it doesn't matter what the consultant charges, what hours he works, howpeople quote here - what matters is the ROI.
And someone with 10,000 hours experience will, in most cases, give a better return than someone with zero hours experience. (with the exception of Government departments where ROI goes down with experience)
And Chris is not taking into account the cost of that 10,000 hours of experience (x hours, whatever experience you may have).
Are you suggesting that, if you had a burst pipe, it would be a waste of time hiring a plumber who isn't the best in the world? That it would be better to try to fix it yourself?
I struggle to understand the relevance. You're comparing employee salary to someone who has taken the risk of going out on his own. The self employed has overheads* that an employee doesn't. He has to market himself. He has an office to maintain. Employers taxes. Perhaps 50% of his time would be non earning overhead. This has to be paid for somehow. Otherwise he may as well stay as an employee.i was trying to point out that others maybe just as experienced may base the earnings more on the line of the uk average or even above and still be able to give 4 or 5 hours time once a month working on his site, or maybe just advising them what to do themselves
What keeps a small business small is they cannot tell the difference between investment and cost...My own thoughts of the members on this forum are that they are mainly relitivly small to medium companies who would be looking for some one to assist the without having much money to spend on the help rather than consultants on £800 per day
And if he stayed as an employee, you'd have to hire your own employee to do what he's doing, train them, wait for the 5 years until he's become an expert
But .50p a week was probably your worth then (no insult intended). You're forgetting the 10,000 hours he put in to become an expert...
As a businessman I've never been one for hourly rates. I'd rather pay someone on performance. If someone makes me a million, I'd be happy to pay him/her 100k even if it only took them 5 mins.
set my adwords up from scratch as well as sorting out stuff for my google products, remarketing/retargeting work
Nope, as I would make it worse, but I am capable of wacking in a few words of copy into adwords, with little risk of problems. A plumber's training is totally different to PPC - you cant compare the two in the same light, since to fix a burst pipe requires real skill from qualified tradespeople, who are governed by a code from a professional body where standards are monitored and protection from Uk law, when something goes wrong.
I could set myself up as a PPC pro, sit behind a PC and insert whatever copy into 50 ads a time, and charge 5k for it - just need to be good at writing adverts, I don't need a paper qualification. Ok, I might not get 5 grand from everybody, but if it works 10 times a year, I just scored 50k! and no protection when I bugger up a campaign, just the client wouldn't use me again. I suppose if the job was that bad, they'll take me to court etc, but I'd just do a good enough job to ensure some sort of result. But clients want huge results, and it may not be possible to do this as so many same type of businesses all doing the same thing and competing with each other, so yup, tough to please everyone.
And Uk law says as long as you provide a service, the client must pay. So just need to get a minimum result to ensure payment via contract.
That seems low to me. When we offered standalone PPC management it was £300/month. I think the resident expert here starts at £200/month.
Then again, the output of someone who has done this 100 times is light years ahead of someone who's still putting processes in place,
I'll sign you up to my PPC course then mediaguy...![]()
That info on PPC methods is available for free online mate and not limited by sales pitches/conditions.
Percent of budget always seems a conflict of interest to me.
Yup, I know what it is and why he did it. It was merely an example to prove the mass of free info on the web, where one can DIY PPC. I think you know this.And the guy who wrote it offers PPC services
and doing all you can to increase your CTR with scant regard to your actual sales figures.