Closed system only work if 100% efficient. No closed systems are 100% efficient. This means you need an external energy source.
There are very weighty arguments from the point of view of reasonableness and expediency of only reasonable correct approach in this matter - this applies to technical and legal aspects. Therefore, I really appreciate your impulse, but from a business point of view, it will not solve anything. From the point of view of the result, it will solve nothing. I have no interest in appearing in front of you as a person who knows something and can do more than you. You also know very well how such a device works - because you are able to observe it in nature. Therefore, there is only one option for setting a goal that is real, achievable, limited in time and capable of achieving a result. This option consists of having a serious interested partner in the UK or the USA for whom the product testing I propose is a minimal financial investment and a technically feasible event. Even if you see the whole set in operation, you will have a lot of doubts and additional questions. And there are really a lot of questions here - both the cost and technical parameters and environmental friendliness and the price for the consumer and the payback period and business prospects for the owner, etc. All this will be positive, but only in the hands of a serious player on the markets. So I thank you for this impulse, but I don't want your money. If you are able to help me find such a partner, even if at the initial stage everything looks like a venture participation - the required amount for such a step is the minimum for any decent company or individual investor, but the potential for such a test will with a huge result. And about the closed system - in this device there is no closed system. Is the world ocean a closed system? Its currents, ebbs and flows are influenced by external factors and energy influences.
Everything I'm talking about has a very simple explanation with the help of traditional physics. I am not adding anything new. Physics was created not by me and not by scientists. Newton spoke about this and repeated Einstein - the most brilliant constructor is nature. Everything around us is created by nature. Nothing new and nothing more than the "author of the universe" a person can never add. It's my opinion. So physics is the only one, just a person has not yet fully figured it out. Does it matter which is more fair - Newton's gravity, or Einstein's gravity? Do you think nature will consult with man how to manage their processes? This is funny. Also, there is no need to talk about gravitational energy - I think that it is not energy) Moreover, it makes no sense to talk about the gravity of the Moon. The long-term effect of such energy generation is absolute neutrality to all natural systems and to the environment in particular. Well, here's a simple example. A traditional generator generates heat - but in order to get it, part of the combusted hydrocarbons, for example, is spent on it. If you change the vectors of electromagnetic fields between the stator and the rotor, the amount of heat generated will decrease as well as the amount of external mechanical energy required to rotate the generator. Isn't this saving resources and improving the environmental component? Maybe the fields rub against each other like an ebonite stick in experiments in physics?) And the most interesting thing is that after Tesla proposed a two-phase generator in his patent from 1888, it turned out to be not enough. But to whom? And why? This is a big question. But even after 1891, when a three-phase alternating current generator was introduced, Tesla drew his drawings. Not all of them have become patents. And in one of his drawings there is an answer to the question of how the generator works, which has a reduced electromagnetic resistance between the stator and the rotor, rotates more easily under load and, accordingly, requires less external mechanical energy, which means it optimizes the issues of raw materials and ecology) Today, a100 years later, we are thinking about the dying corals and the upcoming giant catastrophes. During the industrial revolution, three-phase alternators were indeed the best solution, but now their range of applications can be reduced by 80%. Today it matters at what price electricity is received. This price is life at the expense of their children and future generations. Life on loan - what is the name of one of Remarque's books ...
I will answer you why with specific examples and only my opinion. Because most people are intuitively adequate. External conditions and rules over time make them zombified with the help of dogmas and alleged authority. But in fact it is absolutely obvious - the demand for energy is growing, and the real generation mechanism has the opposite effect in the form of habitat destruction. Tomorrow, authors and especially their children will have nowhere to live on planet Earth. The ITER project is physically and scientifically obsolete, it does not solve the problem, and this is already obvious, the efficiency of invested capital investments is zero. The project of offshore wind turbines in the North Sea - there was a mistake, - the wind map has changed and that's it. The hydrogen program - when yesterday even nuclear power plants were recognized as environmentally friendly for the transition period - is bullshit. It will also be a failure, as before wind turbines and solar panels did not solve anything. Electric vehicles - read the interview with the head of Toyota corporation - he is right - the effect on the climate is no less, and even more - the whole problem is in primary generation. A well-known interview with Bill Gates - all "green" energy is cyclical, without grids and powerwall, its efficiency is zero. And so on and so forth. And most importantly, the resistance of the planet Earth is intensifying - tomorrow not only hurricanes will sweep you away - the issue will be relevant about food security. Despite the fact that for the last 50 years everything has been done exclusively according to science! The glaciers practically melted, the viruses came, the corals almost died. Science is ready to explain where it made a mistake? Self-serving morons, damn it.
"You are avoiding the questions once again". I never get away from the answer - a counter-question was previously asked - introduce yourself, who are you, where are you from and for what purpose are you interested in the details? Depending on whether this information is of mutual interest, I will answer you. Who you are? What exactly is your interest? Are we interested in each other? If yes, we will separately agree on a demonstration of the device not on the forum pages. What exactly do you not understand in my answer? I respect your approach and position - please respect my approach. For example - the planet Earth has apparently warned that it will not allow more people to behave like pigs in its guests. But unfortunately, these small, insignificant entities are more busy measuring "intelligence", language, money and power - who has more .... Well, aren't they morons?
Underwater, yes - because of induction. The UK grid is all AC, as is all of the above-ground European grid.
www.talentsmarteq.com
9 Signs You’re Dealing with an Emotional Manipulator
Emotional manipulators can undermine your sense of who you are and even make you doubt your own sanity. Remember: nobody can manipulate you without your consent and cooperation
I'm not fluent in English. But the problem is that two interlocutors must be able not only to know the traditional dogmas, but also to admit the possibility of thinking independently. Do you remember Einstein's interview where he told how he imagined himself flying on a rocket faster than the speed of light? And after that he asked himself the question - what will happen to that ray of light that cannot catch up with it?
Success? What is a successful career??? For someone, this is the number of likes on YouTube. For others, it is the amount of money in the account. And for the third - it is an opportunity to be healthy, walk, see, breathe. This is too relative a category. When Mr. Tesla was found dead in a hotel room with only a dove on the windowsill - was his "career" successful? He didn't tell me, nor did he tell you. But the fact that the further development of energy has become detrimental to the entire population of the Earth is a clear confirmation you can see outside the window today, and the cries of fighters for the environment are saturated with lies and the desire for personal achievements without a results of their struggle. Didn't Gretta in her interview personally and publicly admit that the achievement of her empty verbiage and rallies was a big ZERO?
I am one of myself! And there is not a single asshole (fool, buffoon, jerk, moron, douche, nitwit, sucker, dunce, dork) who has the right to judge another person! Everything I can tell you I have already said. There is no point in talking anymore for three reasons. 1. You know all this. Do you see the sun? Do you feel the wind? Do you hear the sound of rain? It's like Malevich's square - someone considers his work nonsense, and someone pays millions for such work. 2. The second reason is that there is a good video. This video can be interesting to anyone at any age. This video answers all questions of course when a person has brains. 3. If you are not ready to see what is the advantage of the proposed generator - does it make sense to move on to the second part of the conversation - what design rotates it?
My dear Mr @Electricity , you still do not understand!
Your mastery of English is pretty good
