Neil, why wouldn't those of us who cold call for a living post on a subject that maybe relevant to them?
As for the subject in hand, there will always be preferences and as social networking reaches its peak that avenue may well open more doors. As long as there is a telephone then I personally feel cold calling will still be alive and kicking. If the trend goes towards networking sites even more then cold calling will become that bit more challenging.
Exactly Shay, you absolutely should. But, if not you specifically, then certainly some others were very careful to include links, mentions, nudges, warm-ups, pitches even, to highlight how good they were in the cold-calling and telemarketing scenario - in other words using networks and postings to substitute for cold-calling on behalf of their own business. Thereby demonstrating that, if not RIP exactly, nonetheless a mix of sales and marketing activity was always in evidence and is increasing, and sensible in this specific comparison between the telephone and the "social" networks.
The other points by Steve & Jez about cold/tepid calling and trusting them, liking them, doing good business as a result, and comparing that to netowrking are equally valid. Personally I think that probably 99% of the business I have sold to date (probably 5,000+ deals varying between £5 and £80,000) selling a mix of media from classified ad slots to annual display ad contracts, recruitment ads, exhibition stand space, mailing lists and now online advertising/sponsorship have included a cold/tepid call in there somewhere. And I've had the whole spectrum of replies from a complete stranger saying "wow, thank heavens you called", through to the "don't take cold calls" or "we've been stung before" stuff referred to. But I don't think my unhappy clients are more than 1%.
As I said in my post above though, I have noticed a significant shift in recent years to clients requiring email addresses for broadcasting (and when I say significant I mean 0% in the 1990's, 20% 2000-5, 80% 2005-2008) either exclusively or as part of a marketing mix. I myself also now use email, one to one or as broadcasts, in similar proportions but I'd now say I expect email exchanges to be part of every deal I do and, as the coming thing being referred to here, I met the original poster, Ian at WeCanDo.Biz, I think in here, but certainly in a forum (albeit that I had a record card for his Entelegen set up and he'd responded to one cold-call there a couple of years ago), and I think we're going to be doing a significant amount of business together over the years ahead.
So, as others are now saying, I think it's all a question of finding the right mix. Face to face (had to have been the first), direct mail, (can't see the telegram making a comeback), exhibitions, telemarketing, email, and networks (I think I prefer "business" to "social" - but my SEO guru is telling me I have to look at the Facebook/MySpace stuff) Second Life even for us sales folk (anyone else read Snow Crash by Neal Stephenson?) - and our marketing and advertising friends hammering away at print, radio, TV and online. It's a market economy so, as a consumer, you have to expect some market noise.
Luvverly bunch of 'nanas, only a pand!