By clicking “Accept All”, you agree to the storing of cookies on your device to enhance site navigation, analyse site usage, and assist in our marketing efforts
These cookies enable our website and App to remember things such as your region or country, language, accessibility options and your preferences and settings.
Analytic cookies help website owners to understand how visitors interact with websites by collecting and reporting information anonymously.
Marketing cookies are used to track visitors across websites. The intention is to display ads that are relevant and engaging for the individual user and thereby more valuable for publishers and third party advertisers.
Does she "need" it - i.e is it a legal requirement - No its not.
If she was employing people then she would need to take Employers Liability cover and that comes along with Public Liability.
I agree that you can sometimes take these things to the extreme, but for the small premium this would be (and it will be small) in my opinion its worth it.
Happy to assist if you PM me some details.
This would be product liability, not public liability. AND YES she should have this.....Yes, of course. She will then be covered if a small piece of wire, a sharp edge on a clasp etc causes injury.