- Original Poster
- #1
Hi all,
Bit in a dilemma here.
We had a client that was not paying a substantial amount on the invoice.
We received the judgment in our favour in court ordering the company to pay.
However we have now received a letter from them to say that the CCj is against their trading name and not their limited company name . The name is slightly different and they will not pay until they do another claim in the correct limited name.
This was dealt with by our solicitors so I am annoyed they have missed this out.
What is our likelihood to recover the funds if going through enforcement?
Do we have to start claim again?
They argue if its done in correct name, they will prove they don't have to pay the invoice. What ever that means?
Any advice?
Bit in a dilemma here.
We had a client that was not paying a substantial amount on the invoice.
We received the judgment in our favour in court ordering the company to pay.
However we have now received a letter from them to say that the CCj is against their trading name and not their limited company name . The name is slightly different and they will not pay until they do another claim in the correct limited name.
This was dealt with by our solicitors so I am annoyed they have missed this out.
What is our likelihood to recover the funds if going through enforcement?
Do we have to start claim again?
They argue if its done in correct name, they will prove they don't have to pay the invoice. What ever that means?
Any advice?