Ahh Norfolk the centre of the world, Suffolk to the south, Cambridgeshire to the West. Lincolnshire to the North and North Sea to the East all the rest further out be foreigners
Upvote
0
By clicking “Accept All”, you agree to the storing of cookies on your device to enhance site navigation, analyse site usage, and assist in our marketing efforts
These cookies enable our website and App to remember things such as your region or country, language, accessibility options and your preferences and settings.
Analytic cookies help website owners to understand how visitors interact with websites by collecting and reporting information anonymously.
Marketing cookies are used to track visitors across websites. The intention is to display ads that are relevant and engaging for the individual user and thereby more valuable for publishers and third party advertisers.
Which is also a disadvantage. I notice you never mention the negatives we had to put up with to get that access, including the inability to do trade deals elsewhere - in the rest of the world where there's growth happening! And we had to subsidise all those French farmers.
Unfortunately, being "nearly a fifth of global GDP" is no comfort when your economies are declining and you have a budget hole of a hundred billion euros.
The bigger you are, the harder you fall.
It's not a time when the EU can afford to lose a market that accounts for 40% of their exports (that two fifths to you and me)! And over 60% of their global surplus of trade (that's three fifths).
I think you'll find that the EU don't have much choice.
I don't know whether you or any other Remainer will accept it but it looks like we are in a much better negotiating position that you believed all along. The basis for all the fears you guys were stoking - about how big the EU is relative to us - is not looking anywhere near as scary as it once did. Surely even you see that?
It took a PM who had the balls to do a deal with a deadline that kept the threat of WTO very much alive. The EU will hopefully wake up, smell the coffee and do the smart thing. The smart thing is giving the UK a bloody good trade deal ...and getting very little in return.
It'll mean a huge loss for the EU. But not doing so - and risking an adversarial UK - could result in an even bigger loss!
Tough choice for them. They weren't smart in their offer to Cameron and so the Referendum was lost. They weren't smart in their negotiations with May and sought to give too little thinking that they could force the UK to change its mind about leaving. They lost again. Let's see if they've become smarter over time.
it wont be long before youve been proved wrong.
so we can revisit this post and see whether Clintons claims of the UK being in a strong negotiation position are true or not.
leavers never understand the cost of non tariffs barriers nor the importance of regulatory alignment.
here's some simple facts:
48% UK exports go to EU
8% of EU exports go to UK
EU gdp $16trillion
UK gdp $2.9trillion
in trade negotiations size counts
I don't know who you're replying to (someone obviously on my Ignore list) but fortunately for the UK, we have Remainers like you who have a monopoly on facts.Don't go introducing facts to the Brexit argument. Remember, we hold all the cards blah blah.....
it wont be long before youve been proved wrong.
so we can revisit this post and see whether Clintons claims of the UK being in a strong negotiation position are true or not.
leavers never understand the cost of non tariffs barriers nor the importance of regulatory alignment.
here's some simple facts:
48% UK exports go to EU
8% of EU exports go to UK
EU gdp $16trillion
UK gdp $2.9trillion
in trade negotiations size counts
Don't go introducing facts to the Brexit argument. Remember, we hold all the cards, no customs checks, £350M a week, they need us more than we need them, you just need to have faith, stop talking Britian down, we won 2 world wars, the empire, countries queuing up to sign scores of trade deals, blah blah.....
Don't go introducing facts to the Brexit argument. Remember, we hold all the cards, no customs checks, £350M a week, they need us more than we need them, you just need to have faith, stop talking Britian down, we won 2 world wars, the empire, countries queuing up to sign scores of trade deals, blah blah.....
I don't know who you're replying to (someone obviously on my Ignore list) but fortunately for the UK, we have Remainers like you who have a monopoly on facts.
But Remainers would have this monopoly on facts because they're the more intelligent ones. I hear they have IQ and what not.
They also make great economic predictions and they predicted six out of the last 0 recessions.
it wont be long before youve been proved wrong.
so we can revisit this post and see whether Clintons claims of the UK being in a strong negotiation position are true or not.
leavers never understand the cost of non tariffs barriers nor the importance of regulatory alignment.
here's some simple facts:
48% UK exports go to EU
8% of EU exports go to UK
EU gdp $16trillion
UK gdp $2.9trillion
in trade negotiations size counts
We've already covered this, size doesn't matter. The EU is big, bloated and arguing with itself.
Bigger is only better if that size is focused.
Of course it will. These people will jump up and down and scream and shout because "they're in the right". It doesn't matter how many times life slaps them in the face and proves them wrong. They're still right.... any negative impact of global pandemic of a virus will of course be seized upon as proof that leaving the EU was a bad idea...
Now they've all gone and there's a solid backbone in the cabinet, we can expect things to go properly. I'm looking forward to the UK finally standing up the EU and telling them how it's going to work.
![]()
The EU is panicking.
The EU is terrified of upcoming negotiations.
They are so desperate that they're retreating on the issue of a Canada style deal on the grounds of our geographical proximity to the EU. (The British Isles have moved geographically closer over the last 3.5 years?!)
How silly can you get?
And that seems to be their only argument for not agreeing with us a deal that was good enough for Canada. The truth is that they know we can out-compete them. We have the size, the skills and the clout to cause them serious competitive disadvantage if we have a Canada style deal. That's what it's about. Nothing to do with geography!
This is going to be fun
So, no gun boats necessary. Today the EU were told they have till June - give us what we want (our perfectly reasonable demands) or we'll walk. Let's see if they have the smarts that have eluded them so far.
The European Banking Federation have apparently just asked the EU not to play hardball re Brexit and the City.
You find stocks that are up for sale just before healthy dividends are due to be paid and cash-in the dividends and give nothing to the previous owners. Then you sell them. Under German law, those dividends belong to the previous owners. Often the payments are made off the books and via bank employees' private accounts outside of Germany, so it is both fraud and tax evasion.What is "dividends scalping" Byre
Yes, this is a big unknown. Being an island helps a bit I suppose.If the world slips headlong into a recession (which is looking mighty likely at the moment) is that good or bad for a smooth and trouble-free Brexit?
I can't make my mind up on that one!
There's a lot of dodgy stuff happening in German banking. It's not new. I believe I posted about the Deutche bank saga a year ago (I can't remember whether it was here or in LinkedIn).@Clinton - what you have missed is that the German banking scene is riddled with corruption and two days ago, the Frankfurt offices of ABN Amro were raided by a huge contingent of armed police and fraud officers following reports of dividends scalping!
How could Remainers have been wrong about this (or anything)? They are the ones with higher IQs, remember.
What is the source of your quote?Just updating this old thread, for the remoaners who accused Leave of naughty tricks, the Electoral Commission has withdrawn all its false allegations against Aaron Banks.
“Aaron Banks and the CEO of Leave.EU follow in the footsteps of Darren Grimes by winning in the High Court against the Electoral Commission. Today the Electoral Commission agreed terms of settlement over the Electoral Commission’s announcement on 1 November 2018 of its referral of Mr Banks and Ms Bilney to the National Crime Agency for further investigation.
The NCA stated publicly on 24 September 2019 that having investigated the matters referred by the Electoral Commission, it found that there was no evidence of any criminal offences having been committed by Mr Banks and Ms Bilney. The NCA further notified the Electoral Commission that its investigation showed that the monies Mr Banks used to fund the loans came from the group of companies of which Mr Banks was the ultimate beneficial owner. Today the Electoral Commission finally admitted it was wrong on all counts:
The Electoral Commission considers it was right to refer this matter to the NCA for further investigation, but confirms that it accepts (a) the NCA’s conclusions that it found no evidence that any criminal offences have been committed under PPERA or company law by Mr Banks or Ms Bilney; and (b) the NCA had not received any evidence to suggest that Mr Banks or his companies received funding from any third party.
All that nonsense about Russians. Nyet.
The official Electoral Commission statement says
The National Crime Agency, after its own investigation, has (i) concluded that there is no evidence that any criminal offences have been committed under PPERA or company law by any of the individuals or organisations referred to it by the Electoral Commission; and (ii) has stated that it has not received any evidence to suggest that Mr Banks and his companies received funding from any third party to fund the loans subject to the investigation, or that Mr Banks acted as an agent on behalf of a third party. The Electoral Commission accepts these conclusions.
The Commission’s case was absolute nonsense.”
So, I no doubt reckon many will accept things much more easily now.... LOL.
What is the source of your quote?
What is the source of your quote?
Some of us have moved-on!The real question is whether Remainers like you will now accept the result of the Referendum was fair.
The real question is whether Remainers like you will now accept the result of the Referendum was fair.
So, to be 'fair', it would of needed to be
the EU would not of stopped us exporting...
He will be back soon asking for 'Advise!'I don't know what it is with these super smart Remainer people and their high IQs.
@thetiger2015 , it's not "would of" or "should of". It's "would have" and "should have". The abbreviation of "would have" is "would've", not "would of".
And, no, I didn't go to a posh pub to learn that. I learnt it in a primary school in a little village in a freaking third world country.
It is important to look at original sources, which show that there has been no judgement - this was an amicable settlement - and that the Electoral Commission has merely stated that it accepts the NCA conclusion that there was no criminal activity, which it had already stated. No damages, no apology, no news quite frankly!
I don't know what it is with these super smart Remainer people and their high IQs.
@thetiger2015 , it's not "would of" or "should of". It's "would have" and "should have". The abbreviation of "would have" is "would've", not "would of".
And, no, I didn't go to a posh pub to learn that. I learnt it in a primary school in a little village in a freaking third world country.
So did I! - It was called Wales!II learned it in a primary school in a little village in a freaking third world country.