The Biggest SEO Opportunity for UK Businesses Right Now: AI Search

Think SEO

New Member
  • Sep 10, 2026
    5
    2
    I've been working in SEO and web development for around 25 years, and I honestly think we're going through one of the biggest changes in search I've seen during that time.

    For years, the conversation was basically:

    "How do I get higher on Google?"

    Now we're increasingly being asked:

    "Why does ChatGPT recommend my competitor?"
    "How do I appear in Google AI results?"
    "Can AI actually understand what my company does?"
    "Why am I ranking organically but barely appearing in AI searches?"

    This is becoming a big opportunity for UK businesses.

    We've been working increasingly on AI SEO / GEO alongside traditional SEO, and our own business is now appearing across AI-driven searches, so we've been able to see first-hand what appears to make a difference.

    Some of the most common problems we're finding when looking at business websites are:

    • Google can crawl the website, but the site's actual expertise and services aren't particularly clear.
    • Service pages are too thin or generic.
    • There aren't clear answers to the questions potential customers actually ask.
    • Poor internal linking means important pages are isolated.
    • Location pages are duplicated or virtually identical.
    • Schema and structured data are either missing or implemented badly.
    • Businesses aren't building enough authority around individual subjects.
    • About pages give AI very little information about the company, its experience or who is behind it.
    • Sites look nice but have been built in a way that makes deeper technical optimisation difficult.
    • Businesses are still producing content purely around keywords rather than becoming a useful source that search engines and AI systems can understand and potentially cite.

    One thing we've changed considerably is how we build websites.

    Where appropriate we're building lightweight HTML-based sites that give us much greater control over the code, structure, speed, schema, metadata, internal linking and content than we'd have with some restrictive page builders.

    That's not to say everyone needs a new website. Far from it. A good existing WordPress site, for example, can normally be improved significantly.

    But I do think businesses need to stop treating "SEO" and "AI optimisation" as completely separate things.

    Good technical SEO is still the foundation. Then you build on top of it with strong entities, genuinely expert content, structured information, topical authority and content that directly answers what your customers are asking.

    We've helped rank more than 1,200 websites at number one on Google over the years, but what I'm particularly interested in now is where UK businesses are struggling with this next stage of search.

    So I'm interested to hear from other business owners:

    Have you noticed customers finding you through ChatGPT or other AI tools yet?

    Have your traditional Google enquiries changed over the last year or two?

    And what's currently your biggest website/SEO problem — rankings, traffic, enquiries, local visibility, AI visibility, or simply not knowing what needs fixing?


    Happy to share some thoughts on people's situations if it helps. I'm genuinely interested to see what problems are cropping up across different industries.

    Think SEO
     
    There have been some discussions about this on here;

    I raised the subject in January '25 with this thread where I coined the term AIO;

    Just over a year later @Paul Kelly ICHYB posed the question again as he was hearing a lot about it and there was a good explanation provided by @Kay Mankoo on of the difference between GEO and AIO

    So, yep, it gets some debate
     
    Upvote 0
    Rather than doing SEO or AI anything just think about doing Marketing.

    Not every business needs SEO or to appear in an AI summary. Surely the start point should be the business analysis to determine which marketing channels are appropriate.
     
    • Like
    Reactions: Ozzy
    Upvote 1
    Twenty-five years in, and your list starts one rung above where a lot of UK trades actually are.
    I have been going through UK towns a trade at a time and recording two facts per business: does the domain resolve, and is there a real website behind it. Roofers, four towns, over the last fortnight:
    Stockport - 24 firms, 23 completely fine.
    Rochdale - 22 firms, three of them publishing a web address that does not exist. NXDOMAIN on the bare domain and on www, businesses still trading, phones still answered.
    Wigan - 21 firms. Seven with no website at all, one dead domain, three more that resolve and then serve nothing. Eleven of the 21 with no working web presence.
    Hartlepool - 20 firms, only 12 publishing a site at all, eleven of the 20 with nothing working.
    I query a known-live domain in the same batch every time, so I am not recording my own DNS failure as somebody else's dead site.
    Stockport is the one that matters. Same method, same fortnight, and it came back almost entirely clean. So this is not a story about trades being hopeless - it varies enormously town to town, and I would treat any version of this claim that does not include a clean town with suspicion.
    Where it meets your post: schema, entities and topical authority are a real conversation for a business that has a site. For a decent slice of local trades there is nothing there for an AI to cite, and no amount of GEO work changes that. Worth measuring a patch before quoting for it.
    On your actual question - the biggest problem I keep running into is not rankings or AI visibility, it is that nobody has checked. Owners assume the site someone built for them in 2019 is still up. A fair few of them are wrong.
     
    Upvote 0
    On the other hand @leaddrive if those sites are still bringing in leads then it’s all good.

    Or maybe they have a GBP that pulls in leads or their social media works.

    For many local businesses a website is less important than other marketing channels.
     
    Upvote 0
    You are right, and my own data agrees with you more than it agrees with me.
    Since posting that I went and counted properly, rather than quoting the towns that happened to make my point. Nine towns in one sitting, one method: 146 published domains, each queried on the bare host and on www, with a known-live domain in the same batch so I am not recording my own DNS failure as somebody else's dead site. Two were gone. Seven of the nine towns had none at all.
    So the number I opened with was not representative, and I would rather say that here than let it stand. A trade that never built a site has not lost anything it had, and plenty of them are doing perfectly well on a Google Business Profile and word of mouth, exactly as you say.
    The bit I would still defend is narrower than what I posted. There is a difference between a business with no website and a business that publishes a web address which no longer exists. The second one is advertising a door that is not there - on the profile, on the van, on the directory listing - and anyone who types it in gets nothing back. Nobody tells you when your domain lapses.
    That runs at roughly one business per five towns on what I have actually measured. Far smaller than the figure I led with, and the only one I would stand behind.
    For most local businesses a website matters less than the other channels - agreed, and the counts back you up rather than me. For the handful still pointing customers at an address that stopped resolving, it is not really a marketing question. It is a shopfront with the lock changed and nobody has mentioned it.
     
    • Like
    Reactions: Think SEO
    Upvote 0
    Well, it's all bout your llms.txt, init!
     
    Upvote 0
    Not crawled, not read, nothing.


    28% of the 137K domains using Ahrefs Web Analytics publish an llms.txt file.
    97% of those files received zero traffic in May 2026. Nothing fetched them at all.
    96% of the requests that did reach llms.txt files came from bots.
    19.5% of fetches came from named AI tools (of the 3% of files that weren't ignored). GPTBot is top and Claude-Code is second, ahead of every AI search and assistant bot.
    12% of fetches come from the industry studying itself: GEO/AEO tools, llms.txt checker tools, and researchers.
    Zero requests came from AI bots for llms.txt files that don't exist. They never go looking.
    The Chrome Lighthouse llms.txt audit produced roughly 1 in 1,000 fetches.
     
    • Like
    Reactions: fisicx
    Upvote 0
    Not crawled, not read, nothing.
    Two reasons for this:
    1. LLMs don't actively fetch llms.txt files (think of it as future-proofing).
    2. That example was tested over one month and ignores visits either side of that month.

    I've seen a lot of llms.txt files that are incorrectly configured. I'd say they are definitely being ignored based on previous crawls.
     
    Upvote 0

    Latest Articles