What is a fair penalty for this?

UKSBD

Moderator
  • Dec 30, 2005
    13,058
    1
    2,842
    Woman picks up 5 prescriptions on 20th September, 20th October, 20th November

    2nd week in December she receives a letter saying her pre-paid prescription expired on 15th September.

    What would you say is a fair penalty for making this mistake?
     
    TBH I don't understand the question, but I imagine context would play a big part...

    A prepaid prescription is about £10 a month so she should have paid about £30 for the period from when certificate expired to when it was renewed.

    In that time she picked up 15 prescriptions

    The question was - what do you think would be a fair penalty for this mistake?
     
    Upvote 0
    Did she receive a renewal notice?

    These are usually sent out 1 month before the end of the period? It can also be set it up for it to auto renew by Direct Debit.
     
    Upvote 0
    Did she receive a renewal notice?

    These are usually sent out 1 month before the end of the period? It can also be set it up for it to auto renew by Direct Debit.

    No, not really relevant though, I'm not querying whether a penalty is due.

    I would just like to hear what people think is a fair penalty. and what they think the penalty could be.
     
    Upvote 0
    Agree with @MikeJ - the penalty should be the full cost of the prescriptions.

    There is no excuse for letting a certificate expire, you get notified that it’s running out.
     
    Upvote 0
    Are they arguing she's committed fraud or theft?
    No idea, they aren't classed as fines - they are Penalty Charge Notices
    ie. you agree to pay it when taking out the certificate.

    Similar to parking charges.
     
    Upvote 0
    Agree with @MikeJ - the penalty should be the full cost of the prescriptions

    Unfortunately if the penalty is the price of the prescriptions not paid for there would be no incentive to pay when the prescription is dispensed.

    The charge can be as much as 10 x the prescriptions not paid for.

    I think that for situations where deliberate false claims are made this is not unreasonable, however for the situation the OP has described it is rather excessive.
     
    Upvote 0

    Latest Articles