Would it still be Danish bacon if the Pigs were Danish, but reared and farmed in the UK?
This thread is sizzling !
There will be EU directives not allowing this, although I doubt anyone ever told the pigs...
Upvote
0
Would it still be Danish bacon if the Pigs were Danish, but reared and farmed in the UK?
OK I agree that there are merits to using certain companies abroad but it boils down to relationship and trust.
A client should always have the ability to walk away.
1) it make you do your job right
2) it allows development
Sure there are aspects like contracts but this should be by choice not necessity. For example payment plans.
Started with a mini-rant that was admittedly provoked by exposure to bad outsourced work.
It must be fair to say that if the outsourced work was good, you would be less likely to come into contact with it ...
As a client/end-user of such services, I truly don't care where the people doing the work are, as long as communication is easy and instantaneous. This extends to times when I am dealing with an ostensibly UK-based company; as long as they don't use outsourcing as an excuse for poor quality or delays, I don't feel a need to know if any or all of the work is done abroad.
As far as language goes, to be brutally honest, I expect a better standard of written English from people who learnt it as a second language, particularly people who come from places that were once part of the British Empire. On this thread alone, there are enough errors to set your (yes, your, not to be confused with you're) teeth on edge and I suspect that the worst culprits were born here.
The best part of this has been the wild analogies; from mountain-built yachts to American herds of Aberdeen Angus cattle. (I'm just an immigrant so I'm not sure if I should write Aberdeen 'Angi' or 'Anguses'. 'Cattle' saves the day)
We don't outsource any digital marketing work and it's a USP in the SEO industry
Angus is a breed of cow reared for its beef.
I must admit that I'm disappointed in David, are you sure he didn't say,"David" said "No Sir, you are wrong. A bonnet is a childs hat and you dont sell childrens hats.
Understanding the market mean knowing it. A UK professional will be more in-tune to his surroundings than someone thousands of miles away.
I disagree with the idea that an SEO company who do everything in-house can claim it's a USP.
d
Having signed a customer recently who had bought 3 websites from a Midlands web design firm with high street store front, yada yada, we found a nightmare.
There were broken links, images referenced in multiple subfolders, mixed case usage (sometimes upper, sometimes lower), fugly css and the list goes on and on.
We later found out the designer was a college kid who was employed by the design firm. Why they allowed this poor quality of work to go out is anyone's guess.
I think a lack of commitment to quality, and good service, is rife, no matter where you are located.
I an assure you I an a Lancastrian born and bred.
I'm not sure if this was directed at me but you have made my point so much better than I could have ...
Is that;
have...
have....
have. ...
have ...
or have . . .
?
![]()
You're speaking as a biased customer, who, if i recall, had issues with his web development.
But if i had a big web project on the go and budget i would be inclined to go where's best for vale for money.
Value for money is a difficult thing to judge on a bespoke build or design.
One may be Rembrandt, one Picasso whilst the other Andy Warhol.
All accomplished artist But if you paid £5000 for a painting from each, the Andy Warhol would be value for money but Picasso and Rembrandt would be bargins.
If you have a big project you throw cost out and work out what the project is worth and find someone capable - Not find someone cheap enough to do it.
That's simple. Use a text browser such as lynx and if you still want to buy, then it's a RembrantCan I ask how one would identify if the site is a Rembrant, Picasso or warhole? It's very difficult for us amateurs out here.
Same question if your staff are inhouse/uk based. It's all down to management.What happens when the company in India can't complete the project in time, agreed between you and the client? do you start spinning the client a yarn?
Exactly, if I choose to use a freelancer for part of a clients project and they let me down, then as far as I am concerned I have let the client down.Same question if your staff are inhouse/uk based. It's all down to management.
Exactly, if I choose to use a freelancer for part of a clients project and they let me down, [b[then as far as I am concerned I have let the client down[/b].
Not outsourcing is no guarantee that everything is going to be up to standard, on time & on budget.
If a client chooses my company for a project it is my responsibility to ensure the client is very satisfied with the work.
When using remote workers, whether they are UK based, EU based or elsewhere it is so important to manage that worker and be sure the work is getting completed to the required standard and on time.
Where is the deceit? A client hires my company for a project, My company completes the project using resources available to my company.Just rhetoric.
Of course it's you who has let your client down because as far as your client is aware - due to your deceit, the client thinks it's you who is carrying out the work
But I suppose the ending argument is, as long as everyone is happy, who cares.
Can I ask how one would identify if the site is a Rembrant, Picasso or warhole? It's very difficult for us amateurs out here.
Regardless how it was priced up, it's only deceit if they stated it was manufactured in the UK
I would say that if they are full time employees, then it is Ok wherever they are based, if they are working on a freelance basis then they should be listed as "Part time" or similar.Here's a thing I stumbled over recently (forget who's site it was but it was someone on here) they had an about us/meet the team section on their website listing their team. But when I looked at the employee names on linkedin it turned out they weren't actually employees of that web company - they were just freelancers out in India.
Would you class it deceitful to list say 15 people on your "meet team page" of which maybe 2 are employed in the UK by the web company, and the rest are just freelancers who whilst they may work on the project (therefore are part of the team) aren't actually permanent employees of the company.
I actually thought this was a grey area bordering on being a little bit sneaky, because it read as if they were all part of the web team/company (as you would a standard about us/meet the team page). Whereas in reality the people on the page were just freelancers based in India etc. I could create a meet the team section on our site and add 1000 random freelancers throughout the globe and appear to specialise in everything and have a nice big stable company/team behind me - then just hire them when needed. This would allow me to possibly claim to have the biggest web team on the planet - what a USP!
I'd be interested to hear peoples thoughts on that one.
Thank you for hitting on the true point. You can never get a like for like quote for design - Some people are way more talented than others.
But what you can do it see what the design is built on. This is usually easily comparable.
Here's a thing I stumbled over recently (forget who's site it was but it was someone on here) they had an about us/meet the team section on their website listing their team. But when I looked at the employee names on linkedin it turned out they weren't actually employees of that web company - they were just freelancers out in India.
Would you class it deceitful to list say 15 people on your "meet team page" of which maybe 2 are employed in the UK by the web company, and the rest are just freelancers who whilst they may work on the project (therefore are part of the team) aren't actually permanent employees of the company.
I actually thought this was a grey area bordering on being a little bit sneaky, because it read as if they were all part of the web team/company (as you would a standard about us/meet the team page). Whereas in reality the people on the page were just freelancers based in India etc. I could create a meet the team section on our site and add 1000 random freelancers throughout the globe and appear to specialise in everything and have a nice big stable company/team behind me - then just hire them when needed. This would allow me to possibly claim to have the biggest web team on the planet - what a USP!
I'd be interested to hear peoples thoughts on that one.