What makes the Israeli Army the greatest in the world?

Chunky Beagle

Free Member
Mar 8, 2010
124
14
Derbyshire
Israel defeated 6 established arab nations when it was under 30 years old. [removed by mod - insensitive]

They have yet to lose a war.

They are constantly at the forefront of new military achievments.

The IAF (Israeli Air Force) boasts the greatest pilots. In the six day war they destoryed 462 enemy aircraft while only losing 19.

Some of the most famous and daring special forces missions have been carried out by Israeli Forces, not to many there infamous Mossad outfit.

So what makes the IDF the worlds greatest fighting force?
 

Subbynet

Free Member
Aug 1, 2005
6,000
1,101
45
Luton
So what makes the IDF the worlds greatest fighting force?

A per-soldier spending on defence that even the US can't afford to compete with. Then you have all the secret projects which Israel won't even admit too.

Plus, I have to say, they're far from the greatest fighting force, as they're still fighting decades later - the war never finished.
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0
A per-soldier spending on defence that even the US can't afford to compete with. Then you have all the secret projects which Israel won't even admit too.

Plus, I have to say, they're far from the greatest fighting force, as they're still fighting decades later - the war never finished.

Oh they could finish the war pretty quickly,but one does not think the rest of the international community would be to happy about it.:D

I don't suppose any other nation has been continually at war since the 40's

hence practise makes perfect as every golfer knows.

Earl
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0
So what makes the IDF the worlds greatest fighting force?

Didn't look overly impressive in the Lebanon against Hezbollah in 2006, struggling for weeks against a semi-trained militia.

And then that stunt of abseiling onto the ship where people were waiting to wack them: hardly tactical genius was it?

Mythology. They beat up some of the crappest armies* in the world in the 1960s and 70s, this doesn't make them great.

*Remember some soldiers in these armies still rely on the Allahu Akbar system of weapon control: fire at random and let your God do the aiming.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Subbynet and Sacha
Upvote 0
Didn't look overly impressive in the Lebanon against Hezbollah in 2006, struggling for weeks against a semi-trained militia.

And then that stunt of abseiling onto the ship where people were waiting to wack them: hardly tactical genius was it?

Mythology. They beat up some of the crappest armies* in the world in the 1960s and 70s, this doesn't make them great.

*Remember some soldiers in these armies still rely on the Allahu Akbar system of weapon control: fire at random and let your God do the aiming.

Oh I suspect the kremlin may be a tad upset to hear there MIG's described as such.:D:D:D


must be all that wall kissing the jews do.


Earl
 
Upvote 0
B

Becky Midgley

As a peace-loving hippy, this thread gives me the chills. I'm not mad about it as a person but I'm not disgruntled about it as your community manager, and I think there have been some fair points made, but I am questioning why you are all having this discussion in the first place.

Anyway, I would like to request that all nations and races be respected please, no matter whether you personally think they are 'good' or 'bad'.

Just be careful here please, is all I'm saying.

Cheers ;)
 
Upvote 0
As a peace-loving hippy, this thread gives me the chills. I'm not mad about it as a person but I'm not disgruntled about it as your community manager, and I think there have been some fair points made, but I am questioning why you are all having this discussion in the first place.

Aqusition of knowledge arising from the OP's statement.:)

Without debate mankind may still be living in caves.

Anyone got any bat spray.?:|

Earl
 
Upvote 0

Jeff FV

Free Member
Jan 10, 2009
3,891
1,861
Somerset
Maybe the Taliban are the best, pound-for-pound? (and "£ for £")

They're 2/2 against superpowers (USSR and now USA).

Steve

No army has had a successful campaign in Afghanistan since Ghengis Khan in circa 1229.

I'd say its 3 from 3 for the Afghans v superpowers - Britain, USSR, USA.

Its not called the graveyard of Empires for nothing. I just wish our politicians would have a closer look at history.

Jeff
 
  • Like
Reactions: sirearl
Upvote 0

directmarketingadvice

Free Member
Aug 2, 2005
10,887
3,530
Its not called the graveyard of Empires for nothing. I just wish our politicians would have a closer look at history.

Paul Flynn MP tells a story:

In 2001 an ebullient member of the Russian Duma thumped me on the back and gave me his mock congratulations. "You Brits are very clever. You have captured Afghanistan. We Russians did that – in six days. We were there for 10 years. We spent billions of rubles, killed a million Afghanis, and lost 15,000 of our soldiers. When we ran out, there were 300,000 Mujahadin in the hills around Kabul. It will happen to you."

Steve
 
Upvote 0

directmarketingadvice

Free Member
Aug 2, 2005
10,887
3,530
Here's what happened when the Brits retreated after the first British-Afghan war:

On 1 January 1842, following some unusual thinking by Elphinstone, which may have had something to do with the poor defensibility of the cantonment, an agreement was reached that provided for the safe exodus of the British garrison and its dependants from Afghanistan. Five days later, the withdrawal began. The departing British contingent numbered around 16,000, of which about 4,500 were military personnel, and over 12,000 were civilian camp followers. The military force consisted mostly of Indian units and one British battalion, 44th Regiment of Foot.

Despite the safe-passage the British had been granted, they were attacked by Ghilzai warriors as they struggled through the snowbound passes. The evacuees were harassed down the 30 miles (48 km) of treacherous gorges and passes lying along the Kabul River between Kabul and Gandamak, and were massacred at the Gandamak pass before the survivors reached the besieged garrison at Jalalabad. The force had been reduced to fewer than forty men by a withdrawal from Kabul that had become, towards the end, a running battle through two feet of snow. The ground was frozen, the men had no shelter and had little food for weeks. Of the remaining weapons possessed by the survivors, there were approximately a dozen working muskets, the officers' pistols and a few swords. The remnants of the 44th were all killed except Captain James Souter, Sergeant Fair and seven soldiers who were taken prisoner.[10] The only Briton to reach Jalalabad was Dr. William Brydon.

(from http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/First_Anglo-Afghan_War)

Steve
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0
My grandfather fought in the Afghan wars of 1919. He told all kinds of stories about it. For example, if British soldiers lay wounded, the Afghan women would come out at night to finish them off. The greatest weapon the British had, though, were the Gurkhas. If the Afghans killed one of them, his colleagues would rush up into the hills and not come back until they had exacted revenge.

It's an entirely different philosophy and approach to war, and they know how to take advantage of our rules of engagement.
 
Upvote 0

Gillie

Free Member
Apr 12, 2006
13,065
1,463
North West England
Israel defeated 6 established arab nations when it was under 30 years old. [removed by mod - insensitive]

They have yet to lose a war.

They are constantly at the forefront of new military achievments.

The IAF (Israeli Air Force) boasts the greatest pilots. In the six day war they destoryed 462 enemy aircraft while only losing 19.

Some of the most famous and daring special forces missions have been carried out by Israeli Forces, not to many there infamous Mossad outfit.

So what makes the IDF the worlds greatest fighting force?

Ok, so what's the agenda behind this thread please?

Call me suspicious (Don't you dare Earl!) but seems a mighty strange topic to just suddenly bring up, therefore me being a sensitive type - just wondering who is in for a bashing with this thread or rather what the point of it is - and yes, I know I start some pretty useless threads, but don't usually go for something thats more than a tad political and rather strange and or controversial that starts to go down the realms of race and religion etc!
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: 360interactive
Upvote 0

Gillie

Free Member
Apr 12, 2006
13,065
1,463
North West England
Agree with Gillie, what a strange post to make...

The OP was almost written in a spammy way. Maybe Chunky Beagle is just a big lover of Isreal? Who knows.

Hey, I am Jewish, but wouldnt dream of putting up a thread about how great someone was or rather how great a set of people were in the action of killing other people!!

Doesn't anyone see the macabre side of this thread at all?

Shall we go start one about that taxi driver guy who went on a spree in Cumbria or how about lets all jump on the facebook waggon and go sing the delights of that Raol chap - as thats almost what it equates too - singing the praises of a killing machine!!

You lot are just plain weird!!!!
 
Upvote 0

directmarketingadvice

Free Member
Aug 2, 2005
10,887
3,530
Thats it Butlins again for me this year.:eek:

If your only two holiday options are Afghanistan or Butlins, you might want to expand your choices. :D

Steve

PS Nothing wrong with Butlins. My family went there many times. It's like Disneyland for poor people.

(Attribution: I nicked that joke from "My Name is Earl".)
 
  • Like
Reactions: sirearl
Upvote 0
If your only two holiday options are Afghanistan or Butlins, you might want to expand your choices. :D

Steve

PS Nothing wrong with Butlins. My family went there many times. It's like Disneyland for poor people.

(Attribution: I nicked that joke from "My Name is Earl".)

Can you even put Disneyland and Butlins in the same sentence? one is magical the other is full of chip fat.

i went to butlins once, wasn't my choice, hated the place and it's 8 foot perimeter fence.
 
Upvote 0
The Israelis are 'so good' because they have been funded, trained, etc by the yanks and others. they have so much hardware, and are on a constant state of alert, and have had so much practice that they are now 'good' (whatever 'good' means)

They show no restraint usually, and answer everything that comes their way with extreme force (I particularly like the helicopter gunships they send out when you kill one of theirs...mean but extremely effective).

I understand the reason for the creation of their state, but I'd have to question anyone who thought it would be an easy ride when it was being stuck slap bang in the middle of a load of arab countries, who are traditional enemies.

They are the small nation, surrounded by larger and very aggressive nations, so they have over-compensated and this allows them to live in some relative freedom, which I suppose was the whole idea in the first place.

Not so sure they should be attacking ships with aid workers on them though, but thats another discussion.
 
  • Like
Reactions: iArtist
Upvote 0
The Israelis are 'so good' because they have been funded, trained, etc by the yanks and others. they have so much hardware, and are on a constant state of alert, and have had so much practice that they are now 'good' (whatever 'good' means)

Not quite right Jewish americans along with nearly every jew in the world make sure Isreal gets all it need to exist.

Given the jews history of appalling treatment by the world in general.

Is anyone surprised.?

Interesting bit will be how they interact with China ,once China becomes the world super power.?

Earl
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

owas

Free Member
Jan 3, 2010
1,422
256
could it be that the people there have faced so much hardship in the past / present that they are rightly minded that to protect there children's future they have to be the best the quickest and the most skilled when it comes to war?
 
Upvote 0

Chunky Beagle

Free Member
Mar 8, 2010
124
14
Derbyshire
This is a section for any topic, and I thought I would enter the UKBF community into a debate about a middle eastern power that wrongly gets bad press from all over the world.

Most of the media today has an anti-Israel bias.

A question about how one of the worlds youngest countries could acheive a top military status around the globe is surely a fair one to ask?
 
Upvote 0

Chunky Beagle

Free Member
Mar 8, 2010
124
14
Derbyshire
So you basically - for the sheer hell of it then - start a topic about the glorification of death and how efficient they are at it??

Plus lets throw some religion and race in to it as well .... wow, did you pull legs off spiders as a kid as well??

Excuse me?

Please quote where I have "Glorified death"?

This is a topic about military history.

You have just made yourself look very foolish.
 
Upvote 0

Gillie

Free Member
Apr 12, 2006
13,065
1,463
North West England
Israel defeated 6 established arab nations when it was under 30 years old. [removed by mod - insensitive]

They have yet to lose a war.

They are constantly at the forefront of new military achievments.

The IAF (Israeli Air Force) boasts the greatest pilots. In the six day war they destoryed 462 enemy aircraft while only losing 19.


Some of the most famous and daring special forces missions have been carried out by Israeli Forces, not to many there infamous Mossad outfit.

So what makes the IDF the worlds greatest fighting force?

So talking about greatest fighting force, you talk about their acheivements, and how well they do, that is not glorifying death?? Ok, so they managed to do all this yet didnt kill one person??

Glorify = praise - something you do in your opening post!

So by pointing out that you wish to chat about death and praise an efficient machine you state I am making a fool of myself?

I don't even have to reply to such a statement - you have just answered it for me with your crass statement ...
 
Upvote 0

Chunky Beagle

Free Member
Mar 8, 2010
124
14
Derbyshire
So talking about greatest fighting force, you talk about their acheivements, and how well they do, that is not glorifying death?? Ok, so they managed to do all this yet didnt kill one person??

Glorify = praise - something you do in your opening post!

So by pointing out that you wish to chat about death and praise an efficient machine you state I am making a fool of myself?

I don't even have to reply to such a statement - you have just answered it for me with your crass statement ...

So by your logic, praising the achievments of the Allied powers in WW2 is glorifing death?
 
Upvote 0

Latest Articles