Vaccine Shedding

ADW

Free Member
Oct 25, 2007
1,214
189
Anyone had staff issues where they don't want to be near other people that have had the vaccine? Not worried about distancing on covid but refusing to be in the same space as others that then have the vaccine. Just when things are relaxing on distancing rules looks like this subject could become an issue. Where is the legal stance?
 

ADW

Free Member
Oct 25, 2007
1,214
189
It appears certain people are more afraid of catching stuff from the vaccine than covid. Next level anti-vaxer. It seems info has been spreading for all the conspiracists and some are latching onto this. That is my understanding so far.
 
Upvote 0

Newchodge

Moderator
  • Business Listing
    Nov 8, 2012
    22,792
    8
    8,044
    Newcastle
    Anyone had staff issues where they don't want to be near other people that have had the vaccine? Not worried about distancing on covid but refusing to be in the same space as others that then have the vaccine. Just when things are relaxing on distancing rules looks like this subject could become an issue. Where is the legal stance?
    Either accommodate if you can or try to reason with them. If they have a genuinely held belief that associating with vaccinated people will be a helath and safety issue for them or their families, you will have to try and accommodate it. Of course, that will mean they cannot shop anywhere as they will not know who has and who has not been vaccinated.
     
    • Like
    Reactions: ADW and ctrlbrk
    Upvote 0

    fisicx

    Moderator
    Sep 12, 2006
    46,937
    9
    15,510
    Aldershot
    www.aerin.co.uk
    Where is the legal stance?
    The legal stance is they have to comply with the 2m rule/masks until 19 July. If they feel unable to be this close to someone else you can suggest they take unpaid leave. If they take legal action they will lose.
     
    Upvote 0

    japancool

    Free Member
  • Jul 11, 2013
    9,740
    1
    3,449
    Leeds
    japan-cool.uk
    It appears certain people are more afraid of catching stuff from the vaccine than covid. Next level anti-vaxer. It seems info has been spreading for all the conspiracists and some are latching onto this. That is my understanding so far.

    Sack 'em. Why would you want morons working for you anyway?
     
    Upvote 0

    Paul Norman

    Free Member
    Apr 8, 2010
    4,103
    1,538
    Torrevieja
    From time to time people raise issues that are in this category. Unless you are able to accommodate it, which sounds improbable, the situation has no solution.

    So you either have to ask them to leave, or everyone else.

    I would be kind in the way I dealt with it, but there is not, in my view, room to go that far in accommodating everyone that has a personal foible.

    Of course, if they can produce scientific evidence that being near a vaccinated person is dangerous, then I retract everything I said. Just to be clear, neither Twitter, nor Jane, nor James, down the pub, are approved sources of scientific evidence.
     
    • Like
    Reactions: ctrlbrk
    Upvote 0

    MBE2017

    Free Member
  • Feb 16, 2017
    4,735
    1
    2,418
    I have heard a lot of people talking about this vaccine shedding. I have no idea if it is correct or not, since so much mis information from all sides regarding the vaccine. I see no difference in their concerns to people who wanted others vaccinated.
     
    Upvote 0

    gpietersz

    Free Member
  • Business Listing
    Sep 10, 2019
    2,796
    2
    749
    Northwhich, Cheshire
    pietersz.net
    There is such a thing as vaccine shedding, with vaccines based on attenuated viruses (like oral polio - vaccine).

    The covid vaccines are not of this type.

    The covid anti-vaxxer variant of this idea is that they think people shed the spike protein. What harm this would do even if it were true is not clear to anyone.
     
    Upvote 0
    Either accommodate if you can or try to reason with them. If they have a genuinely held belief that associating with vaccinated people will be a helath and safety issue for them or their families, you will have to try and accommodate it. Of course, that will mean they cannot shop anywhere as they will not know who has and who has not been vaccinated.

    So if I genuinely believe something, employers have to try and accommodate me? They can't just go - you're nuts?
     
    • Like
    Reactions: kulture
    Upvote 0

    fisicx

    Moderator
    Sep 12, 2006
    46,937
    9
    15,510
    Aldershot
    www.aerin.co.uk
    What if I genuinely believed close contact with Jews, Muslims or Scotsmen was detrimental to my health?
    I had a traumatic experience with a Gundam toy as a child and can no longer be near plastic products.
     
    Upvote 0

    IanSuth

    Free Member
    Business Listing
    Apr 1, 2021
    3,441
    2
    1,499
    National
    www.simusuite.com
    If they are truly worried enough they feel 2m distance isnt even enough does that mean they are going to be a hermit from now on - most people they see outside will have been vaccinated. I assume all their shopping will be online (without them interacting with the delivery person) and they definitely will go nowhere near a hospitality venue or sporting event.

    I suppose you could say you will let them work from home but let them know if you come across any evidence of any actions that they take out of work that would make you believe it is not a heartfelt belief then you will consider there representations to you to not return to the office with vaccinated people to be an act of gross misconduct and act accordingly.
     
    Upvote 0
    OH, and if they won't wear it, you can claim it's H&S stuff and that they're breaching protocols!

    [EDIT: I've just (mockingly) passed this past my better half who's been Directer of HR for a big org. She says (pointing out that she doesn't know enough to be definitive!!!!!) that the requirement is that you do a risk assessment and adapt accordingly.

    As the risk assessment will say this person is talking tosh, you'll not have to do anything at that point to accommodate them. It then becomes a question of who they respond and - in turn - how you respond to their response.

    HTH
     
    Last edited:
    • Like
    Reactions: gpietersz
    Upvote 0

    Newchodge

    Moderator
  • Business Listing
    Nov 8, 2012
    22,792
    8
    8,044
    Newcastle
    Upvote 0

    Newchodge

    Moderator
  • Business Listing
    Nov 8, 2012
    22,792
    8
    8,044
    Newcastle
    This is an extracr from a guide produced by barrister Gus Baker on the subject

    This guide identifies ten key points that employers, employees and their advisors need to
    know about health and safety dismissals and detriments in light of Covid 19. They are as
    follows:
    1. It is the employee’s belief that matters, not the employer’s opinion (p8).
    2. Danger is widely interpreted and the actions of other employees count (p10).
    3. Potential danger is not “imminent” (p12).
    4. Employees can take positive steps to protect others from danger even if it hurts their
    employer’s business (p13).
    5. The “danger” doesn’t have to be to fellow workers (p15).
    6. Damages under section 44 and 100 are unlimited, subject to no qualifying service
    requirement and may be extensive (p16).
    7. Constructive dismissal claims are likely if employers fail to deal with health and safety
    issues.
    8. The rights are individual and not collective (p21).
    9. Workers may be protected as well as employees (p23).
    10. Employers must be clear about why they are taking the action they are (p24).

    I have added Bold to the most worrying part.

    You can find the whole guide here https://www.outertemple.com/2020/04...h-safety-dismissals-the-emploment-rights-act/
     
    Upvote 0

    cjd

    Business Member
  • Nov 23, 2005
    16,004
    3,436
    www.voipfone.co.uk
    This is an extracr from a guide produced by barrister Gus Baker on the subject

    1. It is the employee’s belief that matters, not the employer’s opinion (p8).
    [...]
    I have added Bold to the most worrying part.

    In this case though it's not the employer's opinion that there is no risk; it's a scientific fact that there is no risk. Virus (vaccination) shedding can only occur if a live virus is used in the vaccination (and even then there's no actual risk). None of the COVID jabs contain live virus. In this case the employee is simply deluded.

    If there's no objective H&S risk the Act can't apply surely?

    I can see this moving to "well I believe there's a risk, so there is one. It's my mental health."
    In which case the entire world has lost the plot.
     
    Upvote 0

    Newchodge

    Moderator
  • Business Listing
    Nov 8, 2012
    22,792
    8
    8,044
    Newcastle
    In this case though it's not the employer's opinion that there is no risk; it's a scientific fact that there is no risk. Virus (vaccination) shedding can only occur if a live virus is used in the vaccination (and even then there's no actual risk). None of the COVID jabs contain live virus. In this case the employee is simply deluded.

    If there's no objective H&S risk the Act can't apply surely?

    I can see this moving to "well I believe there's a risk, so there is one. It's my mental health."
    In which case the entire world has lost the plot.
    It hasn't been tested in court, so the answer is really not clear. However, if it is a genuinely held belief ignoring it may cause serious mental health issues, so the employee was right in that being forced to share space with vaccinated people caused them harm!
     
    Upvote 0

    gpietersz

    Free Member
  • Business Listing
    Sep 10, 2019
    2,796
    2
    749
    Northwhich, Cheshire
    pietersz.net
    1. It is the employee’s belief that matters, not the employer’s opinion (p8).

    Thanks for that, very interesting.

    Page 8 makes it look a bit better though: "circumstances of danger which the employee reasonably believed to be serious and imminent". The rulings in the two cases it discusses seem reasonable too.
     
    • Like
    Reactions: The Byre
    Upvote 0
    It hasn't been tested in court, so the answer is really not clear. However, if it is a genuinely held belief ignoring it may cause serious mental health issues, so the employee was right in that being forced to share space with vaccinated people caused them harm!

    Which yet again sends the message that the only way to be safe from liability is never to employ anyone.
     
    Upvote 0

    Newchodge

    Moderator
  • Business Listing
    Nov 8, 2012
    22,792
    8
    8,044
    Newcastle
    Thanks for that, very interesting.

    Page 8 makes it look a bit better though: "circumstances of danger which the employee reasonably believed to be serious and imminent". The rulings in the two cases it discusses seem reasonable too.
    'reasonable' appears many times. But think about this. I have a phobia about snakes. I cannot bear to look even at a pencil drawing of one. If my employer asked me, knowing of my phobia, to pick up and remove a grass snake that appeared in the car park, I would be caused harm, not physically by the snake but mentally by my phobia. If the employee who genuinely fears vaccinated people were forced to share space with them, they may be caused harm on a similar basis.
     
    Upvote 0
    Page 8 makes it look a bit better though: "circumstances of danger which the employee reasonably believed to be serious and imminent". The rulings in the two cases it discusses seem reasonable too.
    The keyword being reasonable.

    There is no reason to believe in vaccine shedding, women's only gravity, votes for mice, or any other lunatic idea. Vaccine shedding will probably never be tested in court because it falls at the first hurdle of being a reasonable belief.

    Phobias are real. Dogs, wasps, snakes, people have them for all kinds of things. They are a thing. They are based on real fears. Vaccine shedding is like women's only gravity. Imagined.
     
    Upvote 0

    japancool

    Free Member
  • Jul 11, 2013
    9,740
    1
    3,449
    Leeds
    japan-cool.uk
    'reasonable' appears many times. But think about this. I have a phobia about snakes. I cannot bear to look even at a pencil drawing of one. If my employer asked me, knowing of my phobia, to pick up and remove a grass snake that appeared in the car park, I would be caused harm, not physically by the snake but mentally by my phobia. If the employee who genuinely fears vaccinated people were forced to share space with them, they may be caused harm on a similar basis.

    What about the mental health effects that these people cause their colleagues? Doesn't their behaviour fall under some kind of anti-discrimination law?
     
    Upvote 0

    Newchodge

    Moderator
  • Business Listing
    Nov 8, 2012
    22,792
    8
    8,044
    Newcastle
    What about the mental health effects that these people cause their colleagues? Doesn't their behaviour fall under some kind of anti-discrimination law?
    I can't see how this individual's (mad) belief can really affect their colleagues.
     
    Upvote 0

    gpietersz

    Free Member
  • Business Listing
    Sep 10, 2019
    2,796
    2
    749
    Northwhich, Cheshire
    pietersz.net
    I can't see how this individual's (mad) belief can really affect their colleagues.

    I find talking to single minded activists, conspiracy theorists, fanatics, and people with fixed ideas stressful. I have a reasonable belief that my mental health would be affected by working with the sort of person likely to beleive that.
     
    Upvote 0

    Newchodge

    Moderator
  • Business Listing
    Nov 8, 2012
    22,792
    8
    8,044
    Newcastle
    I find talking to single minded activists, conspiracy theorists, fanatics, and people with fixed ideas stressful. I have a reasonable belief that my mental health would be affected by working with the sort of person likely to beleive that.
    That's easily resolved. Don't talk to them, or, if you must to fulfill your role, both of you are only to talk about the work.
     
    Upvote 0
    Upvote 0

    cjd

    Business Member
  • Nov 23, 2005
    16,004
    3,436
    www.voipfone.co.uk
    ' If the employee who genuinely fears vaccinated people were forced to share space with them, they may be caused harm on a similar basis.

    As 86% of the adult population have been vaccinated with at least one dose it seems to me that this person can not live in our society let alone do a productive job involving anything to do with people.

    The only 'reasonable adjustment' that could be made here would be if the person could work from home so the route to take if that is not possible would be dismissal on grounds of capability?
     
    Upvote 0

    Latest Articles

    Join UK Business Forums for free business advice