Please go back to post 209 and read it, where I make my views very clear.
This is what you said.
I said in post 162 that I had not seen the issue of paying money to terrorist organisation in the press reports. In post 168 I said if I saw such a report it would make it a different matter.
Clearly it is a different matter and yes if she tried to pay money to a terrorist organisation then she belongs behind bars. I have no argument with that.
Ken, there is no point saying how easy it is to find - if I haven't seen it I haven't seen it. There are plenty of press reports that do not mention that fact and it takes the matter from a girl in her bedroom to someone actively supporting terrorism. Maybe it would have been easier just to repost the link when I said I hadn't read about it?
If the element of doubt isn't wrote into that paragraph I don't know what is... The use of "IF" exaggerates the belief we hold that you find it hard to see this girl as guilty.
It appears you agree she should be behind bars, but condemning her actions is hardly forthcoming.
Remember what we were talking about earlier regarding Muslims speaking out and condemning terrorist actions?
Because I don't take anyones word for it with such an issue and I didn't see Kens link. When I asked, twice, for links nobody said there is one on page 8
But I also gave you links and quotes Sally. You said this is the proof you need.
You couldn't be more wrong, despite evidence to the contrary I am not a total moron. My faith does not lead me to believe anyone innocent or guilty of anything based on faith, skin colour, gender or anything else, I take each case as I find it.
I'm not so sure Sally, like I've said earlier in this thread. I think your faith - especially in a thread largely about faith has influenced your replies, and you feel you must defend it.
Hence while others here have condemned this girl, you've sought to find other explanations.
Now - that is my stage exit.
Regards - and no hard feelings
