By clicking “Accept All”, you agree to the storing of cookies on your device to enhance site navigation, analyse site usage, and assist in our marketing efforts
These cookies enable our website and App to remember things such as your region or country, language, accessibility options and your preferences and settings.
Analytic cookies help website owners to understand how visitors interact with websites by collecting and reporting information anonymously.
Marketing cookies are used to track visitors across websites. The intention is to display ads that are relevant and engaging for the individual user and thereby more valuable for publishers and third party advertisers.
In response to your previous...
1 41 is approximately the multiple that a DC link operates in an inverter. This is after an 3phase AC is passed through a bridge rectifier, over diodes. This is nothing to do with your system, as all you are able to generate is the voltage for he DC bus system.
Your reference to using 12 double phases suggest some tyoe of inverter. We would usually use 3 phases for this....again, for reasons you don't even understand.
But I have asked you this before. There are switching losses in an inverter. Where are these losses considered in your equation that your generator is more efficient?
Am inverter uses IGBTs to switch DC to create a very square waved tyoe AC. Two issues around here.
1)already mentioned harmonics
2) literally most types of consumer elcwont work on this type of wave. Basically anything that has a rectifier that operates itself on DC won't like the squared type AC wave. That's why, we only use inverters on things like motors. Even then, we are very selective on which type of motor as the harsh square wave damages the insulation of the windings.
But again......all you have is a desktop DIY project that can only just about light a lamp. I have seen better school science projects than your example.
I don't have the time to continue with this thread......today, we are repairing a 300kw inverter. Once you get a proper working model, with some real numbers then let's talk. Untill then, you can't even cook a meal on what you have produced, though I suppose it does save on the heating, as you can keep pulling that sting to get a flicker of light.
you are right - there is nothing to correspond about - when you tell a person that all the data is in official patent databases, and he doubts - nonsense ... When you are ready to submit 9 models for testing - which have already been tested - and they do not believe in it - nonsense .. The solution can be very simple - we conclude an agreement, prescribe the conditions and the party that bears lies and nonsense will pay the other party if the information is confirmed. The received patents contain information about the identity of the inventor, his personal data - isn't it idiocy to expose such information in the sewer? I thought that on this forum it is possible to meet serious people))) In any case, I wish you all the best!This has all been highly entertaining and all I am able to take away from this is that no patent has been granted, but two were applied for. A full patent does provide protection and if @Electricity shows some documentation then we can take this further.
In my news agency days, we had to deal with bogus engineering claims almost daily. That is why one asks for patents and demonstrations of working models doing whatever it is that they are supposed to do.
Paranoid utterings about network monopolies are straight from the Nikola-Tesla-Conspiracy playbook and are guaranteed to put normal people off.
And no, Siemens and other major engineering companies do not runabout, stealing other people's IP. It is just not in their interests to do so as it is cheaper and easier to just pay a license fee.
It's a forum for business people. Some more serious than othersI thought that on this forum it is possible to meet serious people))) In
Pretty much the life cycle of a new enquiry here:In my news agency days, we had to deal with bogus engineering claims almost daily. That is why one asks for patents and demonstrations of working models doing whatever it is that they are supposed to do.
I never once said that I was a businessman. But everything else - I'm ready to confirm - and if anyone allows himself to blurt out with impunity - we must remember - this is not right. All received patents for inventions in the official databases of the patent offices. All blueprints, texts and working samples - exclusively for a bilateral agreement with an adequate person and absolutely officially - under legal agreements. also blueprints of an engine for spacecraft operating without jet propulsion))) - don't you believe it? Including patent texts and drawings. And if anyone allows himself to doubt - I regret the time spent. Everything is simple)It's a forum for business people. Some more serious than others
But why have you not answered any of the business related questions?
you are right - there is nothing to correspond about - when you tell a person that all the data is in official patent databases, and he doubts - nonsense ... When you are ready to submit 9 models for testing - which have already been tested - and they do not believe in it - nonsense .. The solution can be very simple - we conclude an agreement, prescribe the conditions and the party that bears lies and nonsense will pay the other party if the information is confirmed. The received patents contain information about the identity of the inventor, his personal data - isn't it idiocy to expose such information in the sewer? I thought that on this forum it is possible to meet serious people))) In any case, I wish you all the best!
Yes, how much can be repeated - patents for inventions have been obtained in several countries. To date, I am ready to officially confirm protection in the UK until 03/22/22. But why all this??? In addition to all this, I am ready to provide information that is not in any patent bases - it is precisely this that is the essence of everything.Exactly what is claimed in respect of the Patenting of this? Is a patent granted or has only a patent been applied for. What is the "Priority date" of the patent? What is the initial application date? To which office has the application been made?
@Electricity - why have you removed the videos? You say you have working models ready for testing. This suggests you can demonstrate sustainable generation. If this is the case you can make a video and show us.
Or as a suspect is the more likely case you can’t generate electricity for more than a few seconds. And even then not the 240VAC most households require.
This is really bizarre. If you have received the patents it should be a trivial matter to confirm the patent number and the country where it has been granted. Nowhere in the world can you get a patent on something without publishing it.
How much power can your largest model continuously generate and what inputs does it require?
Reminds me of someone who wanted to put solar panels in New Zealand and transmit the power to a receiver in the UK using long-range radio waves.
Yes, how much can be repeated - patents for inventions have been obtained in several countries. To date, I am ready to officially confirm protection in the UK until 03/22/22. But why all this??? In addition to all this, I am ready to provide information that is not in any patent bases - it is precisely this that is the essence of everything.
I'm here for the duration. @Financial-Modeller play chess with pigeons cliched it for me..I'm oot.
I never thought that so many morons could be gathered in one place...)I'm here for the duration. @Financial-Modeller play chess with pigeons cliched it for me..
I never thought that so many morons could be gathered in one place...)@Electricity, do you know this fella?
![]()
Some Secrets of Fans
Some Secrets of the fans A fan creates an air stream when it is operating. This air stream is made up of lower pressure at the front and higher pressure at the back. This air stream is the output of the fan. In other words, the output of the fan made up of lower pressure output at the front...www.ukbusinessforums.co.uk
If you Google ‘man with van London’ you’ll find him after a bit of clicking/scrolling, and be in good company!I never thought that so many morons could be gathered in one place...)
The problem with this is that if there are patents in several countries then you should be able to identify the patents. The fact that you haven't means I am pretty certain that you do not have anything that is "investable". Hence I am not inclined to read any more.Yes, how much can be repeated - patents for inventions have been obtained in several countries. To date, I am ready to officially confirm protection in the UK until 03/22/22. But why all this??? In addition to all this, I am ready to provide information that is not in any patent bases - it is precisely this that is the essence of everything.
these are my patents - for my inventions -)))))) - this is the surrealism of debilism))))The problem with this is that if there are patents in several countries then you should be able to identify the patents. The fact that you haven't means I am pretty certain that you do not have anything that is "investable". Hence I am not inclined to read any more.
these are my patents - for my inventions -)))))) - this is the surrealism of debilism))))
Those aren’t the patents you described earlier in the thread.Please see two examples in the background picture and avatar.
These are just two of those patents for inventions that I talked about earlier - any request for more information or numbers is ridiculous)))
How the kit works - turbine + non-standard generator 5-10 kWh.
The main part of the kit is the turbine. The generator can work both on permanent magnets and use an excitation winding. The essence of a unipolar generator is that not a single part of the winding experiences the alternating effect of different magnetic (or electromagnetic) poles. Any individual part of the winding experiences a periodic effect of the same magnetic pole. It is important that the materials used are not those used in the manufacture of traditional generators, with the exception of magnetically conductive steel grades for the stator cores. The rest of the material is mostly aluminum. As a result, such a generator, when compared with a similar traditional generator, for example, both 5 kW - has a reduced need for a source of external mechanical energy to rotate the rotor with a closed circuit by 30-50% less, weighs 20 to 30 percent less, and so on. The shape of the windings and magnetic belts is completely different than in a traditional generator. To talk about this, you need to at least look at the actual blueprints for the device in order to understand that this generator is completely different from the traditionally used ones. Dot.
Turbine - perpetual motion machines are impossible, the law of conservation of energy cannot be violated, and so on. This is pure physics. The turbine is a hybrid of a wind turbine and a tidal power plant. But in fact there is no propeller in it. Designed to provide the consumer with an energy source of 5-10 kW per hour 24/7. I simply did not consider higher powers - they require generators with an excitation winding - this can only be done in a specialized organization. The cost of such generation is the payback of 1-2 years, depending on the capacity, the period of use is 10 years, maintenance of 1 station about once every six months (approximately) at a cost of 10 dollars. The installation can be used to generate electricity, respectively, heat, etc.
If someone has a real desire to get the full amount of information on the turbine-generator set, i am ready to discuss it individually, but not on the forum pages. Correspondence on the forum will no longer be.
Thank you all ve
These are just two of those patents for inventions that I talked about earlier - any request for more information or numbers is ridiculous)))
How the kit works - turbine + non-standard generator 5-10 kWh.
The main part of the kit is the turbine. The generator can work both on permanent magnets and use an excitation winding. The essence of a unipolar generator is that not a single part of the winding experiences the alternating effect of different magnetic (or electromagnetic) poles. Any individual part of the winding experiences a periodic effect of the same magnetic pole. It is important that the materials used are not those used in the manufacture of traditional generators, with the exception of magnetically conductive steel grades for the stator cores. The rest of the material is mostly aluminum. As a result, such a generator, when compared with a similar traditional generator, for example, both 5 kW - has a reduced need for a source of external mechanical energy to rotate the rotor with a closed circuit by 30-50% less, weighs 20 to 30 percent less, and so on. The shape of the windings and magnetic belts is completely different than in a traditional generator. To talk about this, you need to at least look at the actual blueprints for the device in order to understand that this generator is completely different from the traditionally used ones. Dot.
Turbine - perpetual motion machines are impossible, the law of conservation of energy cannot be violated, and so on. This is pure physics. The turbine is a hybrid of a wind turbine and a tidal power plant. But in fact there is no propeller in it. Designed to provide the consumer with an energy source of 5-10 kW per hour 24/7. I simply did not consider higher powers - they require generators with an excitation winding - this can only be done in a specialized organization. The cost of such generation is the payback of 1-2 years, depending on the capacity, the period of use is 10 years, maintenance of 1 station about once every six months (approximately) at a cost of 10 dollars. The installation can be used to generate electricity, respectively, heat, etc.
If someone has a real desire to get the full amount of information on the turbine-generator set, i am ready to discuss it individually, but not on the forum pages. Correspondence on the forum will no longer be.
Thank you all very much.
«…or no you are not» Seriously, I don't know who you are talking about.Electricity. I have a serious question. Are you the member we had here before called Swissaw? I am left with a huge feeling of deja vu in your content, style and responses to questions. You could simply say yes you are him, or no you are not. It perhaps doesn't matter, but it determines future direction. I usually try to join in conversations, but I discovered Swissaw to be a member with a very strong and passionate point of view, but somebody unable, or willing to listen to others who had alternative viewpoints or actually asked questions. So far here, you have avoided answering any serious questions, and used secrecy as the reason for not being able to provide evidence. This is what our old member repeatedly did. He didn't get very far at all, because of it, and you seem determined to shout repeatedly but never ever listen, or answer any questions directly. The old threads were mostly about a new transportation system that also seemed to fight the laws of physics. Was the idea to be frictionless and have a high starting point in Scotland and coast all the way to London, and vice versa? Something like that?
«…or no you are not» Seriously, I don't know who you are talking about.
«…you have avoided answering any serious questions» I do not have an indicator that determines, according to the generally accepted and standard formula for all, the seriousness or frivolity of an issue.
«…and used secrecy as the reason for not being able to provide evidence. » What is proof anyway? - one can argue - but I have a law degree with honors and I know - evidence is different and very different. This is an evaluation category and also has no templates.
«…and you seem determined to shout repeatedly but never ever listen, or answer any questions directly. »
Here are my direct answers:
1. I do not consider it normal and correct to publish information containing personal data on a publicly accessible resource.
2. even in this letter of yours you admit inaccuracy - here is a quote - «…that also seemed to fight the laws of physics. » On what basis do you conclude that the devices I'm talking about violate the laws of physics? You haven't seen detailed documentation or tested technical models. Thus your statement is unfounded. I think it's at least uncivilized. And it is this style of communication that leads to a response. Patents are not issued for inventions that violate the laws of physics, and such phrases offend, first of all, those expert specialists who have researched and approved patent applications - it turns out that the author is a priori smarter than everyone at once? I highly doubt it...
3. I'm not going to achieve anything on this forum. The purpose of my visit is to try to find people who are interested in the devices I offer. If the interest is mutual, then in personal correspondence we could discuss the issue with such a person in more detail.
4. all the products that I have are easily solved using the tools of traditional physics - however, I am not ready to answer some questions, since I have not fully explored why in practice it happens exactly the way it happens (but what is the difference between kilowatts and kilowatts per hour - it’s a shame to even discuss)! On this score, I have only assumptions - the final answer will be given by scrolling in a good laboratory with a complete package of indicators for all parameters. It is possible that there will be some negative parameter that crosses out everything else. Maybe nothing negative will be found and the essence of the reduced resistance between the stator and the rotor in the generator will be explained quite easily ...
5. I am not going to try to build a business on my own inventions, which is why I am looking for a person to whom I can transfer all devices (9 models of generators, 3 turbines, patent documentation, and so on) on mutually beneficial - here must raise the question will arise where I got all these drawings - but this is a completely separate topic for conversation - all documents are legal and in one copy.
6. no patents already obtained and the information in them will give you an exact answer on how to build the proposed devices so that they work - for this you need the samples that I have, blueprints and the last two patent applications that have not yet been filed.
7. please excuse my English