By clicking “Accept All”, you agree to the storing of cookies on your device to enhance site navigation, analyse site usage, and assist in our marketing efforts
These cookies enable our website and App to remember things such as your region or country, language, accessibility options and your preferences and settings.
Analytic cookies help website owners to understand how visitors interact with websites by collecting and reporting information anonymously.
Marketing cookies are used to track visitors across websites. The intention is to display ads that are relevant and engaging for the individual user and thereby more valuable for publishers and third party advertisers.
I don't think the Tory party would accept that.Lis Truss replaces Thérèse Coffey with Rishi Sunak as Deputy Prime Minister, goes on sick leave, leaving Sunak and Hunt in charge
I think every group not in power makes noises for an election whereas the others don't yet when it comes to vote the lingering doubts about Brexit being opened up and it will, Starmer is an outlier in his own party. Then how Labour will raise more taxes and I dread to think about they would have handled COV-ID, I take supplements and got rid of the symptoms in 24 hours, had to change them with the Delta virus and took 48 hours. Talking to friends that did take the first or 2nd vaccine and now say they will never take another in their life.Better for what, or whom?
According to the polls (and I accept they are not always entirely accurate) a GE now would result in the annihilation of the Tory party, an outcome most would accept as justified.
Imagine if it was replace Thérèse Coffey with BorisI don't think the Tory party would accept that.
I had never voted Tory before last year. But after Labour consistently wanted more suppression of society and for longer (remember Kier Starmer in July 2021 ? : "lifting all restrictions is irresponsible") I would not want a Labour government under any circumstances. I would be concerned they would reintroduce Covid restrictions (or for flu and anything) with far less concern about society, the economy and our freedoms.Better for what, or whom?
According to the polls (and I accept they are not always entirely accurate) a GE now would result in the annihilation of the Tory party, an outcome most would accept as justified.
You do realise, don't you, that Labour was not in power and that it was the conservative government that imposed lockdowns and decided their duration?I had never voted Tory before last year. But after Labour consistently wanted more suppression of society and for longer (remember Kier Starmer in July 2021 ? : "lifting all restrictions is irresponsible") I would not want a Labour government under any circumstances. I would be concerned they would reintroduce Covid restrictions (or for flu and anything) with far less concern about society, the economy and our freedoms.
My wife really was right !Back in 2012 my wife famously stated every PM we have had has been worse than the one before.
But even she, and I, did not think we could get worse than Boris Johnson.
We were both wrong.
Which one?I don't think the Tory party would accept that.
This!This party is finished, in more ways than one.
Labour not only supported them they were encouraging them to go further for longer.You do realise, don't you, that Labour was not in power and that it was the conservative government that imposed lockdowns and decided their duration?
No chance of that. TBH I don't like modern life, I would far rather have been bringing up my lad in the 1970s. These days there's too much technology and, even worse, too many regulations and restrictions on all of our lives "to keep us safe".The British Isles will become,e a completely different place - and hopefully a better place.
Right on cue....I don't like modern life, I would far rather have been bringing up my lad in the 1970s. These days there's too much technology
We have had to stop sharing team sheets for a teenage girls rugby team but that is because an estranged father who is an alcoholic keeps trying to stalk his daughter to talk to her when there is a protective order prohibiting it. He has appeared at 2 away game so far and caused hassle (banned from the grounds of our club)No chance of that. TBH I don't like modern life, I would far rather have been bringing up my lad in the 1970s. These days there's too much technology and, even worse, too many regulations and restrictions on all of our lives "to keep us safe".
Latest thing to really **** me off. As a swimmer myself (apart from when stopped from doing it for 7 months during the lockdowns, thanks for that.....) I have been trying to get my lad into swimming since he was about 2, he's now 9. He has finally got into it, joined a club and swam in his first gala on Saturday. What's more I was pretty confident he'd win (which he did), so imagine how upset I was when told I could not video his triumph. That would never have happened in the 70s.....
There are idiots who think using a stolen card will work.Who the hell is going to fraudulently pay the soddin' HMRC !
In the 70's it was easier as we did not have the internet - we also didnt all have portable video recorders in our phones - the restrictions come with the increased opportunity
But if they pay the HMRC they know who it is and can trace them ! And the payment would just bounce, eventually.There are idiots who think using a stolen card will work.
As an aside, my banking app has a pay HMRC option. Makes things a lot simpler.
Sadly I do not think it's got much to do with increasing use of technology, it's because society, particularly in the richer countries, are becoming more and more risk averse and more and more willing to accept restrictions to their liberty "to keep them safe". What happened during Covid was that in a nutshell.We have had to stop sharing team sheets for a teenage girls rugby team but that is because an estranged father who is an alcoholic keeps trying to stalk his daughter to talk to her when there is a protective order prohibiting it. He has appeared at 2 away game so far and caused hassle (banned from the grounds of our club)
Sadly there are people who will look for footage of children swimming for non innocent reasons - how do you police that kind of thing without stopping people like you recording their own child's accomplishments
In the 70's it was easier as we did not have the internet - we also didnt all have portable video recorders in our phones - the restrictions come with the increased opportunity
You are right, people hear about it more, so they think it's more common these days, when in actual fact AFAIK it's actually less common than it was.In the 70’s the local plod would have beaten , sorry, helped these people get up after falling over several times, it normally worked.
The opportunities have always been there in the past, which is why a certain type of person used to enter the clergy or become a scout master. With the internet and more freely available information the public have simply become more aware.
Much worse with that dimwitI don't think things would be any better under Starmer. So whatever happens, we will just continue to suffer.
Sadly these people don't spend much time in the real world, hence being so out of touchDoom and gloom on both sides of the house of commons.![]()
Can they REALLY be any worse than this week?Much worse with that dimwit
I reckon that is about right - nobody will want the poison chalice, so unless they areHow about ....... those with the real power behind the scenes in No10 right now are pushing through all the "bad stuff" now letting Truss be the fall Guy (or should I say lady) they will reach a tipping point maybe in the next few days or weeks and low and behold a new PM will be announced and this knight in shinning armour will be portrayed as putting things right arriving with a raft of good news and hoping all the voters will fall for it
Just a thought but of course could fall flat on her face today on PMQs and be out by the weekend.
I'm not sure that's ever been a prerequisite for an ambitious politician from any party!I can't see how any intelligent person in the Labour Party will want to be in Government now . . . .or for the next 5 years....
I agree if they wanted to they would be doing a vote of no confidence and calling for a general election.I'm not sure that's ever been a prerequisite for an ambitious politician from any party!
We get the government we deserve.I can't see how any intelligent person in the Labour Party will want to be in Government now . . . .or for the next 5 years.
Their only bright light will be the ousting & demise of the Conservative party (self inflicted & deserved), other than that they'll run the country deeper in the mire.
We need the Romans in.