Have you done this Massey? If so then care to share the results? If not then it's just conjecture.
Upvote
0
This thread started with someone asking a valid question and he's had a range of opinions in reply. It's up to the O/P to make his mind up which is the best advice and, more importantly, to seek some opinion from elsewhere to get a balanced view.
However, I thought it would be interesting to see what the highest value exact two word domain sold for compared to the top hyphenated domain. I didn't spend a lot of time looking but this is what I've found.
CreditCards.com - $2,750,00
DataRecovery.com - $1,659,000
Hotel-Reservation.com - $210,000
Does anyone have an example of any more high value hyphenated domains?
you mean they treat hyphenated domains and non-hyphenated domains the same?
Do you have a link to this video?
Can't find Matts video but this may help:
http://www.google.com/support/webma...um=1&query=hyphens+in+domain+names+more:forum
Earl
What are you talking about.?It isn't because the exact match (non-hyphenated) always has, and still does, gets counted as a ranking factor.
Problem price wise is that only the enlightened realise that there is very little difference in the ranking power of a domain ,whether or not it has a hyphen,which of course applies to the domain extension also.
No one types in an exact match if there are more than 1 word.:|
...yet we're still waiting on this proof, oh enlightened one![]()
So why can't google recognise that a hyphenated domain is just as good an exact match? Everyones seems to be advising that a set of concertise keywords is better than the a hyphenated set. I'm just suggesting that there is no appreciable difference. As demonstrated by the seomoz testing and the reduction in influence noted in the 2011 survey.OK, I think I've got it.
You think because two words would naturally have a space then google recognises a hyphenated domain as a search query with a space in it.
What you're missing is the fact that google can recognise an exact match in two words combined and take that as a signal that you are bound to be on topic for that term.
So why can't google recognise that a hyphenated domain is just as good an exact match? Everyones seems to be advising that a set of concertise keywords is better than the a hyphenated set. I'm just suggesting that there is no appreciable difference. As demonstrated by the seomoz testing and the reduction in influence noted in the 2011 survey.
Either post some evidence in a clear forum post, or stop talking nonsense and posting absolute crap.
And google has chosen that both formats have almost exactly the same weight and that this particular element has a low SEO score when compared to all the other elements. There was an SEO boost last year for an exact match domain name, I've got a nice niche with a hyphenated domain that did very well. But this doesn't work anymore. As I said, look at the seomoz tests and surveys, they agree with my supposition.You've got that back to front. Google doesn't need to recognise anything. Google chooses what is better, we as webmasters need to recognise which Google has chosen.
I don't disagree...Presumably even if you don't believe keyword domains themselves give you a benefit, you do agree that links with that anchor text do?
I don't disagree...
I don't have anything to do with the niches you mention (moral grounds), however I would say that everyone dealing in those niches is in the same boat, so some lateral thinking is all that's required.![]()
I have a site on Software Evaluation. It does quite quite well in Google with it's hyphen. It's first of 45 million results and I am happy to accept that the domain name plays a big part in this. Google software evaluation.
.
There is a video by Matt cutts that explains that google treats both domains with hypens and extensions the same.
Even seomoz.
Even who.?
here is an example of a hyphen domain doing pretty well at No2.
http://www.google.co.uk/search?q=ca..._gc.r_pw.&fp=4f061ee8aa4abfcf&biw=939&bih=562
also kwik-fitinsurance does pretty good for the major "car insurance"
Earl
Seriously... if you're not going to post a sensible example why bother?
Your first one is pagerank 7, higher than anything else in those top 10. You can't use an authority site of proof that those domains are getting a benefit in the search engines... you need to use one that has less links and authority than the sites its ranking above.
I don't even know where to start with your second example.
So if the tests aren't reliable why did you thank Massey?I think Seomoz testing is generally garbage... they are not running scientific tests. They're running sales pitches.
So you think the little green bar is important.?:|
That explains a lot.
Earl
Going back a million pages in this thread, I questioned the absolute statement that a non-hyphen domain will always get an SEO boost and it will always be greater than a hyphenated domain. I'm sure examples can be made both ways which leads to the supposition that there is not appreciable difference. There are no absolutes in SEO, it is the aggregation and integration of ranking signals that matter.
Well I'm certainly not going to spend half an hour looking at the backlinks of the top 10 results to try and prove your latest trolling attempt wrong... so yeah the fact it has toolbar pr7 is a general indication that the site has some domain authority. Maybe it rented lots of links and removed them recently, I don't know.
Assuming it does have backlinks, then its a completely garbage example from you as usual.
How about you either put up or shut up... show us a single example of a hyphened domain getting a bonus in Google please.
All it tells me is that people haven't cottened onto the usefulness of using hyphens in their domain names. Once people realise that both are pretty much equal as an SEO signal more will be used.
Cheers for the advice guys.
The whole argument with regards to hyphenated keyword rich domains vs non-hyphenated is certainly an interesting one, but it's not really the question that needed answering.
I need to know how much of an improvement a hyphenated keyword rich domain would provide over a domain that didn't provide an exact match (hyphenated or otherwise). As stated in the OP, would www.car-insurance.co.uk (hyphenated keyword rich domain) provide much SEO benefit over www.bobsinsurance.co.uk (non-hyphenated non-keyword rich domain) for the search term 'car insurance'?
I appreciate that it may well have been answered already somewhere in the thread, however there are clearly a lot of posters in here that know their stuff when it comes to SEO and I'd very much like their input on the above query, rather than the hyphen vs non-hyphen for same domain.
Thanks.