I asked for evidence to back up this BS and all I got was questions about my views from a poster from the untraceable organisation !
Yikes.
You described coaching and mentoring as: "it is all a load of old bunkem."
When I pointed out that there was indeed much evidence for the effectiveness of high quality coaching, you said you wouldn't trust any statements about such studies.
You then said "they need to explain what study and who did it and even better who payed for it".
I gave you an example of such a study, with who did it, and you can see nobody paid for it.
You peculiarly didn't comment on the evidence and made some strange comment about not knowing who I am.
So no, you asked for evidence, you got it, and then ignored it. Now you're saying I'm a poster from "the untraceable organisation". What organisation are you talking about?
As Clinton said, most people who advertise themselves as visionaries etc are pratts. However, as Ashley_Price and I have earlier said, if you step away from the awful coaching franchise people, there are some coaches out there who are incredibly effective. And mentors too.
I just don't see why anyone would be so vehemently against the idea (and the evidence..) that some people who are mentors and coaches are amazing at what they do.