Or on the flip side do men (johnson for example) try and carry on well past their best before date.
In business, I don't want the owner of a business I'm working in to just quit at the first sign of trouble.
In medicine, I don't want the surgeon to quit at the first sign of blood.
In war, I don't want the general turning around the moment he spots the enemy.
Sticking it out is what we expect leaders to do when the going get tough. Cameron was widely criticised for
not sticking it out and for resigning when he did! Men just can't win, can they?!
I don't like that Sturgeon woman, but the SNP were counting on her to keep fighting for that independence thingie of theirs...and she left them in the lurch. I am glad she's going, but let's get one thing straight: She let her party and her colleagues down by deciding to leave now when the going is getting tough for the SNP's #1 goal.
In Jan she said, in response to the Aherne resignation, that she's "got plenty in the tank". That tank got empty pretty quickly.
Cameron was criticised for whistling on his way back to No 10 after his resignation speech. He wasn't going to be PM any more, he took it on the chin. Theresa May, and other women, got all emotional and choked up.
How emotional are these women? I don't know. But I'm not sure it's a great idea to have a highly emotional person, male or female, in charge of the red button. Or making other major decisions. (Just like it wasn't a great idea to have a brash Tony Blair in power when there was a decision about going to war in Iraq)
There's a woke, anti-men agenda that has infected western society. It is okay today to say that a man is unsuitable for the job because of X, Y or Z attribute, attributes that are often aligned with masculinity (as you have done).
But try pointing at your TV and saying, "Get that ultra-sensitive, whiny, manipulative, emotional and illogical nag to STF up" and see what happens!
you're a bloke after all.
