- Original Poster
- #1
OK any help or advice would be appreciated on this one. A company has two directors, director A and director B.
Director A is in charge of all the books, sales, purhcasing, etc and Director B is in charge of all production. Director A goes to the bank and arranges an overdraft without the knowledge of Director B, all the money in this overdraft goes missing (some used to pay bills I am sure, not 100% where the rest of it went but mostly into Director A's other business' bank account).
Director B wants to buy out Director A and they agree a way this can be done, however the overdraft then comes to light and the bank want Director B to put a personal gaurantee to it.
Should the bank have allowed this overdraft on the signature of only one director, or should two signatures have been required?
Director A is in charge of all the books, sales, purhcasing, etc and Director B is in charge of all production. Director A goes to the bank and arranges an overdraft without the knowledge of Director B, all the money in this overdraft goes missing (some used to pay bills I am sure, not 100% where the rest of it went but mostly into Director A's other business' bank account).
Director B wants to buy out Director A and they agree a way this can be done, however the overdraft then comes to light and the bank want Director B to put a personal gaurantee to it.
Should the bank have allowed this overdraft on the signature of only one director, or should two signatures have been required?
