Cost to develop this type of website

  • Thread starter Thread starter Jason_Fisher
  • Start date Start date
J

Jason_Fisher

Hi, i have come across a website design and style i would like to have developed and just wanted to find out more details, for example, is there alot to developing the back end? What sort of budget would you be looking at? How long would it take etc.

http://living.tv/index.php

As much info as possible would be great.

Thanks
 
You dont want that it will be a SEO nightmare unless you spend on ppc etc it will be buried on page 236 of google..

People get fed up after a minute of slides and stuff trust me ;)
 
  • Like
Reactions: sirearl
Upvote 0
Its a flash based website so SEO will suffer but I can offer you a quote on this project if you can give me a few more details.
 
Upvote 0
It's clearly javascript from looking at the source, I wouldn't have chosen to use that kind of layout, too many clicks to get where your going... lol it does look good though plus I like how fast the streaming video is, nothing worse than waiting for video to load...
 
Upvote 0
Are you looking for just a "graphic" design style or a site with similar features?

Developing a site with a similar feature set is pretty straightforward, it's really just a glorified business directory. If it's a directory site you're looking for then you might need to budget between £1-2k for something decent.
 
Upvote 0
The website is mostly using Flash. The backend is developed using PHP.

hmm,

A) It is clearly not Flash at all! Anything that looks flash is actually JavaScript (jquery)

B) The only flash elements are the streaming video

C) Yes the front and backend are constructed by PHP.

Noone else need say its flash, its not... end of...
 
Upvote 0
agreed - is javascript:

<script type="text/javascript" src="js/jquery.js"></script> <script type="text/javascript" src="js/jquery.metadata.min.js"></script> <script type="text/javascript" src="js/jquery.maphilight2.js"></script> in the code shows that...
though it uses more than jQuery (e.g. overlib used for the popups)

test for flash:
source code - look for .swf - none
fire up site on ipad - works ;)

Alasdair
 
Upvote 0
hmm,

A) It is clearly not Flash at all! Anything that looks flash is actually JavaScript (jquery)

B) The only flash elements are the streaming video

C) Yes the front and backend are constructed by PHP.

Noone else need say its flash, its not... end of...

Yep the Jquery is used for sliding those images on the home page.

The streaming videos are the most important part of website.
 
Upvote 0
whats the betting that the original poster could care less whether this site is jquery, flash or esparanto!
If you can get someone reliable with examples of similar work who can put this together for £600 then you should bite their hand off.
 
Upvote 0
Thanks for all your comments. Dave, you are right, i have no clue what the differences are anyway? As long as the developer i work with knows what it is and can quote me then i'm happy.

PhoneTrader - Could you please contact the freelancer and get him to send me some examples of his work, thanks.
 
Upvote 0
The cost of the website structure is only a small part of the equation, the content is where the real cost will be.
 
Upvote 0
I think it's a business that has great potential.

I'm no web-designer, but I wonder to what extent one is allowed to copy the site in eg Dreamweaver and then tweak the code, change graphics, and rewrite the copy. At what point would it differ sufficiently from the original so as not to infringe intellectual rights?

As a perspective, builders will often look around a Barrat's showhouse, pick up a floor plan, change it by moving an internal wall or two by a foot, and go build a house from it. That's extreme - but how much would one need to change a website before it becomes an "original" design?
 
Upvote 0
I think it's a business that has great potential.

I'm no web-designer, but I wonder to what extent one is allowed to copy the site in eg Dreamweaver and then tweak the code, change graphics, and rewrite the copy. At what point would it differ sufficiently from the original so as not to infringe intellectual rights?

As a perspective, builders will often look around a Barrat's showhouse, pick up a floor plan, change it by moving an internal wall or two by a foot, and go build a house from it. That's extreme - but how much would one need to change a website before it becomes an "original" design?

a lot depends on uniqueness...

for example - our CMS - any one isolated bit of php in it is unlikely to be original or unique (lots of people use php terms / functions / etc.) but put them together in the way in which we have and it becomes unique...

the concepts behind the architecture - unique

etc.

in your home example - the uniqueness might be the precise measurements - but the originator of it would have to show that they came up with it... i.e. that they were the creator of the uniqueness...

so with a website - use of jQuery libraries is not unique - they are free to use, but the layout / the assembly of the code / etc. might be considered to be unique...

Alasdair
 
  • Like
Reactions: Wild Goose
Upvote 0
Whist the site look snice and the navigation is terrible, you could use something like Joomla and knock the bones up very quickly!
 
Upvote 0

Latest Articles