can I get a mobile header review please?

[mugatea]

Just looking for a header review. I was using two headers before, one for desktop and another for mobile that had less info. So when viewed on desktop the mobile header would 'hide' and vice versa on mobile. But now I'm using just one header and have attempted to style it so it works on mobile too while keeping the same info as the desktop one. Any advice/criticisms especially about styling it for mobile would be really appreciated.

The header can be seen on my homepage www.bdws.co.uk

.

 

[Darren Jaskowicz]

Hi
I like your site how it is now. Got all the info I would need if I was looking for your services.

 

[James Rae]

You could always speed up your site by optimising the images and adding expires settings in htaccess. Also, you have some coding issues which includes getclicky and javascript.

 

[mugatea]

I think my images are kinda optimised, no? I'm using WPRocket cache plugin, so that might be upsetting the coding. How do you know that anyway?

 

[James Rae]

A quick look at JavaScript Console, Google Pagespeed Insights and GTMetrix always helps to discover potential user experience challenges

 

[Toby Willows]

Works and looks absolutely fine on my mobile. No issues with speed and everthing fits fine. Good job.

 

[James Rae]

Unfortunately, like it or not, the performance of a website in the eyes of Google is more important than a mere human.

 

[Toby Willows]

Unfortunately, like it or not, the performance of a website in the eyes of Google is more important than a mere human.

Not true. Google looks at, and ranks, the human experience.

 

[James Rae]

Well @mugatea I guess you have to weigh up the differing opinions... from members with no details in their profile, providing evidence of experience and ones with evidence.

Probably better to review what comes from 'the horses mouth' by going to Google PageSpeed Insights URL.. https://developers.google.com/speed/pagespeed/insights/?url=bdws.co.uk

 

[Toby Willows]

Well @mugatea I guess you have to weigh up the differing opinions... from members with no details in their profile, providing evidence of experience and ones with evidence.

Probably better to review what comes from 'the horses mouth' by going to Google PageSpeed Insights URL.. https://developers.google.com/speed/pagespeed/insights/?url=bdws.co.uk

You misunderstood. I mean the overall human experience is what is important to google. I wasn’t focusing on one aspect.

 

[James Rae]

Oh @Toby Willows you said what I wrote was NOT true... I'm not focusing on one aspect, just offering @mugatea some valuable insight as to how the website is seen technically and again I reiterate it will affect ranking

 

[Toby Willows]

Oh @Toby Willows you said what I wrote was NOT true... I'm not focusing on one aspect, just offering @mugatea some valuable insight as to how the website is seen technically and again I reiterate it will affect ranking

I think we are at a cross purposes. Google rank on the human experience as a whole. I agree how you build your website effects how google will rank it. One aspect alone (speed for example) won’t be a deciding factor.

 

[James Rae]

Who said speed was the only deciding factor? I must have missed it

 

[Toby Willows]

Who said speed was the only deciding factor? I must have missed it

You did. You posted a link.

 

[James Rae]

Unfortunately, like it or not, the performance of a website in the eyes of Google is more important than a mere human.

Where does it say DECIDING FACTOR? I did state that the way Google sees a website... which strangely could include human behavioural indicators... I think @mugatea will understand

 

[Toby Willows]

Well @mugatea

Probably better to review what comes from 'the horses mouth' by going to Google PageSpeed Insights URL.. https://developers.google.com/speed/pagespeed/insights/?url=bdws.co.uk

Where does it say DECIDING FACTOR? I did state that the way Google sees a website... which strangely could include human behavioural indicators... I think @mugatea will understand

I guess you forgot your previous link.