By clicking “Accept All”, you agree to the storing of cookies on your device to enhance site navigation, analyse site usage, and assist in our marketing efforts
These cookies enable our website and App to remember things such as your region or country, language, accessibility options and your preferences and settings.
Analytic cookies help website owners to understand how visitors interact with websites by collecting and reporting information anonymously.
Marketing cookies are used to track visitors across websites. The intention is to display ads that are relevant and engaging for the individual user and thereby more valuable for publishers and third party advertisers.
I'm not sure, but the link still seems to work, even though it appears to be hanging!Why do the links you add keep "hanging" you can close a thread come back to it later and its still there hanging ?
Strange its been happing for a few days now have noticed it on quite a few threadsI'm not sure, but the link still seems to work, even though it appears to be hanging!
I'm not sure, this isn't something I'd noticed until you pointed it out.Why do the links you add keep "hanging" you can close a thread come back to it later and its still there hanging ?
Yes, I've seen that it's happening on all links. Apologies, I only meant that it was something I hadn't picked up on until you mentioned it.Its actually doing it on your post above, link just continually says "loading"
Don't let Ozzy near the on off switch then ?Yes, I've seen that it's happening on all links. Apologies, I only meant that it was something I hadn't picked up on until you mentioned it.
This has already been flagged to the team, reference UKSRV-27023 if you're interested in following it up at all.
As it's a bug, it should be dropped straight into our next development cycle (starting 12th of June) provided *touch wood* nothing major happens between now and then.
Thanks for flagging![]()
Has this gone back on again?I've disabled the live evaluation for now, which will stop the checks from taking place during post-creation. Posts are still subject to being held for review if the tonality is deemed to be too negative (we've tested this extensively and it will typically only flag if there's a lot of f-ing and blinding or some outright nasty speech) but users will no longer know if their post is past the threshold until after they hit "Post reply".
I'll speak with the managers of the integration and see if we can adjust the frequency at which the integration tests the content.
The page display has changed on mobile and the problem has gone away. After clearing all cookies and browsing history (I like to do this occasionally) the recent posts page now has a drop down for questions or posts rather than two side-by-side buttons that were possibly causing the issue.So you're seeing the same issue in Chrome? I'm not and I cannot reproduce on my phone or any other colleague's devices.
Are you able to test this in Chrome directly and send a screenshot to support, please?
Perfect, I'm glad to see it got resolved. The issue got flagged to the team from a support ticket, so the team were able to isolate the issue.The page display has changed on mobile and the problem has gone away. After clearing all cookies and browsing history (I like to do this occasionally) the recent posts page now has a drop down for questions or posts rather than two side-by-side buttons that were possibly causing the issue.
Nope, it hasn't been reenabled.Has this gone back on again?
I'm not seeing the bar shoot across, but line breaks are disappearing every time you start typing again, the spell check is OK though...
Ah, so it wasn't just me going madPerfect, I'm glad to see it got resolved. The issue got flagged to the team from a support ticket,
Can't replicate it today, did it on Friday but seems OK now.Nope, it hasn't been reenabled.
Are you able to send some details of the issue you're seeing to the support team, please?
[email protected]
I assume you're joking? ?Why aren't you supporting Brave? It's becoming the browser of choice for many.
How do you know? Brave blocks all tracking by default so you wouldn't even know someone is using it. It's built on the Chromium Web core so stats often get lumped in with Chrome.I assume you're joking? ?
It's behind Yandex, Sogou, QQ, Opera - even behind the discontinued and no longer available Internet Explorer.
I Google'd browser share of market and looked at the first few results to compare their league tables.How do you know? Brave blocks all tracking by default so you wouldn't even know someone is using it. It's built on the Chromium Web core so stats often get lumped in with Chrome.
Yes, but because Brave blocks tracking those stats are very skewed.I Google'd browser share of market and looked at the first few results to compare their league tables.
+1, apart from a few niggles.That being said, as it's a Chromium Web core browser (ie Chrome) there shouldn't be any reason for it not to be supported. I use it and UKBF works just fine for me.
My point was really to highlight that Brave is fully supported by UKBF because it’s a Chromium browser. You just won’t ever know who uses it.??
We've had an average server response time of 15 seconds since 12 noon today.Anyone else getting intermittent access to UKBF today? It's either unreachable at times (confirmed with downforeveryoneorjustme.com) or very slow.
They are working on it. Personally I think they let Ozzy press a button again.UKBF has been extremely slow to load for me across multiple devices this morning (pages taking 1 minute plus to load).
Is there something going on?
I would like to clarify this time it was not me (this time) who pushed a button, but a button was pushed.Personally I think they let Ozzy press a button again.
Just curious as to whether your test environment has a copy of the same database used in live, or is it just a sample set?which in the test environment only took a few hours to complete.
They are working on it. Personally I think they let Ozzy press a button again.
A copy but anonymised. Still, something is clearly different.Just curious as to whether your test environment has a copy of the same database used in live, or is it just a sample set?