Whatever the right's and wrongs of the PM, there has been a one sided consorted effort by the press to get her out, we used to have the main TV channels offer both sides of the arguments i.e. for and against. now we have 100 percent attacks,
According to the press we are the only country in the world with high inflation, high food prices and high fuel costs
Do we also need poor questions, like "are you finding it hard to buy food or heating" such loaded questions is crap reporting
Liz/Kwatang had 1 plan and no back up
It was to reduce as much as possible all taxes and regulation - it is the very essence of why a certain faction wanted Brexit. The theory is/was that by removing market inefficiencies the resultant average gain results lead to greater profits in total so a lesser % is still a larger absolute amount and/or the reduced size of the state (less regulation and other public expenditure reduces the cost of govt) means that tax take is still greater than state expenditure so the books balance.
However she was undone by a few things
1. Lag - everything mentioned above takes time to play out and the reduction in income (tax) comes well in advance of the efficiencies working through the system to increase total output and also well before govt expenditure decreases work through. When you are fighting a deficit and with nflation roaring away is precisely when you cant afford to it
2. Risk Aversion - the majority of economists don't believe the increase in output and decrease in spending would be enough that the reduced % tax take would be compensated for.
3. People - people don't want a smaller state on average - they all want some parts of the state reduced but those are the bits that don't affect them, few will vote to reduce the spend on the bits they use. Parents more more on education, pensioners want more on bus bases and pensions, the sick (and relatives thereof) want more on the NHS, drivers more on roads, farmers more in subsidies. LOADS more on defence when Putin is raging
Add those together (plus some others) and it is obvious that the political and economic currents were so strong that an attempt to plough on with no communication or attempt to take the detractors with her was suicide.
What do you expect the BBC/SKY, Bloomburg, FT to say - "it works on SimCity so give her a couple of years to see if it works in real life, in the meantime be prepared for deprivation for it will be worth it maybe"
Her inability to hold a crowd, present to her peers (let alone the public) made her near impossible task definitely futile and her pace made it suicidal.
As an aside the likely direction of travel now for public finances and public sector priorities renders Brexit even more pointless - honestly what "red tape" (otherwise called essential regulation) do you see being removed (as opposed to just renamed in imperial) or what competitive advantage do you think we have as a country outside the SM without undercutting through reduced regulation