- Original Poster
- #1
I became a franchisee back in 2005 and traded that brand for the past 7 years ,
I showed great loyality to the franchisor and built my business even though I was never given a operations manual, ongoing support, nor any business training.
Communication from the franchisor was small, and I only received sporadic text messages saying Hi or Happy Christmas in fact I hadnt spoken directly to the franchisor for nearly 4 years from 2008.
Unbeknownst to me the franchisor dissolved the company I had the franchise agreement with in June 2010, I continued paying the franchise fees unaware for over a year and stopped paying in August 2011. And had No contact from them.
Since then I had stopped trading that brand name and began trading under my own name.
In July 2012 the franchisor makes contact and says he has noticed that there is no payments made and starts demanding unpaid fees, and says that the old franchise company (now dissolved) had assigned the agreement to his new ltd company back in 2010. And if it does not receive any money they will enforce termination consequences under that agreement.
He hasnt produced a valid assignment.
In the Franchise agreement there is a clause below which states.
23. ASSIGNMENT BY FRANCHISOR
23.1 THE Franchisor may assign or otherwise deal with the benefit and burden of the whole or any part of this Agreement, without any consent from the Franchisee, and in the case of an assignment, it will procure that the assignee enters into a direct covenant with the Franchisee
23.2 The submission by such assignee of a direct covenant with the Franchisee to observe and perform all the Franchisors obligations contained in this Agreement after such assignment shall release and discharge the Franchisor from all obligations under this Agreement.
There was never any direct covenant, and the franchisor and assignee are the same person
Can someone please shed some light on this technical situation?
Because it seems to me that a franchisor can neglect, twist, turn and believes it has full rights
even when its wrong!
And a franchisee has no rights.
I showed great loyality to the franchisor and built my business even though I was never given a operations manual, ongoing support, nor any business training.
Communication from the franchisor was small, and I only received sporadic text messages saying Hi or Happy Christmas in fact I hadnt spoken directly to the franchisor for nearly 4 years from 2008.
Unbeknownst to me the franchisor dissolved the company I had the franchise agreement with in June 2010, I continued paying the franchise fees unaware for over a year and stopped paying in August 2011. And had No contact from them.
Since then I had stopped trading that brand name and began trading under my own name.
In July 2012 the franchisor makes contact and says he has noticed that there is no payments made and starts demanding unpaid fees, and says that the old franchise company (now dissolved) had assigned the agreement to his new ltd company back in 2010. And if it does not receive any money they will enforce termination consequences under that agreement.
He hasnt produced a valid assignment.
In the Franchise agreement there is a clause below which states.
23. ASSIGNMENT BY FRANCHISOR
23.1 THE Franchisor may assign or otherwise deal with the benefit and burden of the whole or any part of this Agreement, without any consent from the Franchisee, and in the case of an assignment, it will procure that the assignee enters into a direct covenant with the Franchisee
23.2 The submission by such assignee of a direct covenant with the Franchisee to observe and perform all the Franchisors obligations contained in this Agreement after such assignment shall release and discharge the Franchisor from all obligations under this Agreement.
There was never any direct covenant, and the franchisor and assignee are the same person
Can someone please shed some light on this technical situation?
Because it seems to me that a franchisor can neglect, twist, turn and believes it has full rights
even when its wrong!
And a franchisee has no rights.