- Original Poster
- #1
I was discussing with a friend of mine about an idea for a business model. I was wondering if this would work, if it would be legal, potential issues with it, etc.
Say that I own a product in bulk, and that I get an independent (i.e. non-chain) shop to sell my product without the shop actually owning the product (I would retain ownership of the product at all times, until the consumer walks into the store and buys the product; at this point, the consumer gains the sole ownership of the product). The shop simply acts as a 'broker' for the product (like a drop shipper, but with a physical store), and reports to the supplier the number of products sold per month. The shop pays the supplier the total revenue for those products. The supplier then pays a commission to the store for each product sold. What would be the potential issues with this model? Is this even a 'thing' in common practice?
The main benefit for the supplier would be that shops should be more likely to stock the product, since there is no upfront cost to the shop; if the product was new to the market and without proven sales, I'd have thought this could be a good way to sell the product without any empirical sales data (as less risk to the shop); I'd also imagine that this model would allow for lower storage costs for the supplier;
The benefits for the shop owner would be the following:
i) No up front cost (and therefore less risk);
ii) Possibly less liability? E.g. if the product was faulty or otherwise returned, the shop would only lose out on the commission;
iii) Less marketing/promotional cost since the supplier does this.
Would this idea work?
Say that I own a product in bulk, and that I get an independent (i.e. non-chain) shop to sell my product without the shop actually owning the product (I would retain ownership of the product at all times, until the consumer walks into the store and buys the product; at this point, the consumer gains the sole ownership of the product). The shop simply acts as a 'broker' for the product (like a drop shipper, but with a physical store), and reports to the supplier the number of products sold per month. The shop pays the supplier the total revenue for those products. The supplier then pays a commission to the store for each product sold. What would be the potential issues with this model? Is this even a 'thing' in common practice?
The main benefit for the supplier would be that shops should be more likely to stock the product, since there is no upfront cost to the shop; if the product was new to the market and without proven sales, I'd have thought this could be a good way to sell the product without any empirical sales data (as less risk to the shop); I'd also imagine that this model would allow for lower storage costs for the supplier;
The benefits for the shop owner would be the following:
i) No up front cost (and therefore less risk);
ii) Possibly less liability? E.g. if the product was faulty or otherwise returned, the shop would only lose out on the commission;
iii) Less marketing/promotional cost since the supplier does this.
Would this idea work?