By clicking “Accept All”, you agree to the storing of cookies on your device to enhance site navigation, analyse site usage, and assist in our marketing efforts
These cookies enable our website and App to remember things such as your region or country, language, accessibility options and your preferences and settings.
Analytic cookies help website owners to understand how visitors interact with websites by collecting and reporting information anonymously.
Marketing cookies are used to track visitors across websites. The intention is to display ads that are relevant and engaging for the individual user and thereby more valuable for publishers and third party advertisers.
He's not asking about how to design a website, he's asking if a graphic design can be converted to a working website.
Best format, PSD or PNG.
All of the points people have made about designing the website are clearly well intentioned but missing the point.
Graphic designers who just do graphic designs do not 'do' websites. At best they do graphic designs of a website. A static picture of a website. A working website is very different from a static picture of a website. Try buying something from the following picture of Amazon's website:If I had a website done by one of our graphic designers would it be possible to change it into a working website.
Just to clarify what I mean by this. A PSD in itself doesn't have to be layered, it could be one flat layer, so just asking for a PSD is not ideal.full quality fully layered photoshop psd
O Rly? So programming, UX, accessibility, user testing, site structures and architecture, information flows, readability, captology and so on all hang on the whim of the graphic designer?I can do that for you , whoever says they cant is talking rubbish. Its the way it should be done.
Just as well you are here to keep everyone right then.
Actually you are correct. More information is required but it is wrong to suggest that "any" design can be converted to HTML. I once had a graphics company ask me to do a website based on their design and their layout could not be recreated because it was based on text wrapping around curves. This is one example of what cannot be done.
The words of the type of designer that programmers and Alan Sugar hate to work with. Nearly every series of The Apprentice has had a team that has lost because they had this attitude - one that comes to mind was when the teams were to design a calendar; the losing team designed a nice cats calendar that had great photography, but the calendar was part was too small to be useful. The moral of the story - design should complement functionality and not dictate it; in web terms this means it should complement how the user can access the content - including navigation, readability and SEO.I can do that for you , whoever says they cant is talking rubbish. Its the way it should be done. Design department designs and then its up to the skill of the webdesigner to make it happen, taking cross platform issues into consideration and presenting the problems encountered to the designer for an agreeable solution. Give me a bell and i'll have a chat about it.
Eh?...if we were all in a meeting we would commune into a web design sunami ! you can in html if you insert an swf into it.
No you can't. You can convert a photoshop file into HTML/CSS but all you have done is create a layout not a working website.YES YOU CAN TAKE A PHOTOSHOP DESIGN INTO A WORKING WEBSITE...
Noun
web site (plural web sites)
A collection of HTML and subordinate documents on the World Wide Web that are typically accessible from the same URL and residing on the same server, and form a coherent, usually interlinked whole.
Eh?
No you can't. You can convert a photoshop file into HTML/CSS but all you have done is create a layout not a working website.
What happens if the client decides they want to change the colours, increase the padding around the H1, add a border to an element, increase the width and so on? If the layout was created in photoshop you need to go back to and update the file, export and hope it doesn't affect all the work the programmers have been doing. On the other hand if you had begun with the HTML framework and added CSS to create the layout then making the changes is a doddle and can be done on the fly using a FF plugin.
Agree. You can convert an image into a layout but that doesn't make it a working website. Building a wroking website still needs someone to dive into the code and create all the pages, navigation, content and so on.This is going nowhere. I think the point is being missed.
This is going nowhere. I think the point is being missed.