Wanting Advice From 100+ per Day Click & Drop/RM Users on Workflow Method

Smithco

Free Member
Nov 29, 2021
54
11
Manchester
I've been a long-time reader of UKBF but this one I couldn't find a historical topic on so here I am.

We sell online using two Opencart platforms, the odd Romancart link for bespoke orders alongside Amazon and a couple of eBay accounts. Volumes are typically 100-200 items a day. We use DPD for the bigger high-value stuff (no issues there) and Click & Drop (even though they collect it) for the bulk of it.

The workflow on the Click and Drop is what we're having problems with.

On the old Royal Mail OBA life was easier, pack the stuff, split the large letters from the parcels, weigh the bags, divide by the number of items and put the average weight in. Lemon Squeezy.

Now we've gone over to the new barcodes and the Click and Drop platform, we're using mostly regular 48 for economy delivery, 24 Tracked for the premium orders and the odd international service for those orders.

The problem is with inputting the weights. Our RM price deal is worked out on the assumption that our average item is 1kg (reviewed every three months). That's OK as much stuff is 100-300g, and others might be 1-2kg. The average will be about right.

Because we have many mixed orders, and packaging varies, few orders are the identical weight. It's not like we sell two or three types of widgets that come in mailing boxes and they're all the same weight. Two identical orders may even differ in weight as we use a lot of recycled packaging, recycled boxes and cardboard shred. Other stuff goes in mailing bags, some in padded envelopes, etc.

The way we do it at the moment is we print invoices/packing slips, then pull all the orders into the RM interface, exclude those that will be DPD later (only maybe a dozen or so a day), we print the postage labels, attach them to the invoices, then they get picked and put on the pre-packing shelves, and then packed and bagged.

This means we have to guess the weights at the point of label generation. Before picking and packing. And this is the problem. if something weighs less than the label says, no problem. If it's a few grams more, nobody will likely notice or care. If it's a big difference that we notice, we go back and reprint the label with the right weight on so we don't get surcharged on a revenue check. Tedious.

But this is not only highly inefficient, it can muck up our averages. When we send the occasional something that weighs six or seven kilos, it's OK as it's averaged out (eventually by RM at pricing time) by all the other stuff that is 500g or so in order that our average is still 1kg. But if we are guessing 700g and it's really 400g were 'losing' 300g a parcel that could be used on other heavier stuff (if that makes sense). And in any event, guessing is a crap way to go here. Were looking to do more and in order to add another 50-100 a day I need a better system with accurate weights.

When we receive stuff from others, weights are often accurately noted on the labels. Instead of a guestimated 5kg like we might put, their parcels arrive saying for example 3.87kg on. So others are working with some kind of system that probably allows weights to be inputted at the packing desk and the label generated there. That's what we need. And that's what I don't know what we need to do that. I need to see or have described someone else's workflow to see how that might be achieved.

Probably we need to print one label at a time at the packing desk somehow with a different printer (it's 4 to an A4 sheet now and that wastes time too). The packing desk is 20m from the office where stuff is printed and booked. And we cant have packers making decisions about shipping methods, etc. That needs to happen in the office. Perhaps there's some software that enables this? I dunno, that's why I am here.

Ideally, I need to see someone else's operation to see how we might do this. Or have it described in detail. I only know one person with a larger operation than us, and although I know him, he won't show me his setup as it's 'commercially sensitive'.
 
I have run operations of this scale, RM Click and Drop sucks for this volume. I am writing a custom system for our own systems currently but have you looked at Linnworks or Shipstation?

Happy to chat to you about how we did it in the past with multiple platforms and Linnworks.

Darren
 
Upvote 1
Is a Linnworks type system the answer here? I looked at Linnworks some time back, but then the price went through the roof while I was thinking about it. Shipstation I haven't looked at, but I will now. My concern with using a lesser-known third party is if they vanish overnight, you've to start again. Also, if another web server is put into the chain, I am worried about reliability. But others are doing this so it must work I guess.

Indeed, the chap I know I mentioned above I think wrote their own software to help them with this. That's probably why he wont let me look at it.
 
Upvote 0
We're UK OpenCart Gold Partners if you want to discuss any OpenCart-specific aspects of this?

Paul.

Thanks for the offer, Paul. However, I use the chaps at Web Desires already for anything and everything OC related and their service is excellent.
 
Upvote 0
So I've had a chat with Darren above on the horn and the first step is to make sure all the platforms have slightly overstated or actual packed product weights entered in. This reduces the manual input needed. A very simple, if time-consuming step that is blindingly obvious when you think about it. Sometimes it takes a chat with someone else for a penny to drop. I note it here for the benefit of passing readers in the future.

After that, we'll investigate the Shipstation idea, and I'll hit you up then, Alan, if I may.

There isn't that much out there about the growing pains an e-commerce business encounters. You start out all chuffed down the Post Office if you have 10-20 orders. Later on, when you're in three-figure quantities every day and you have business and courier accounts, you have a long learning curve and an evolution of practices as it dawns on you that the way you did stuff before is suddenly terribly inefficient.

Your packing methods change, parcel volumes and weights become a thing, the cost of packaging becomes an issue, and eventually, the workflow itself must be analysed as you seek to increase efficiency in order to grow further. It all sounds really simple to someone who hasn't done it, but when you run out of day, and your parcels are being collected and you still havent packed some orders - you start to seek out ways of doing it faster.
 
Upvote 1
This might work as an interim solution. Load the orders on C&D but not print the label, then edit weight and print label at time of packing. If done as a batch, the order number and weight could be written on package, or a small integrated label from despatch note/receipt could be used to match to avoid errors. Any big difference between imported calculated weight and final weight could also flag a packing error.

Using a thermal 6x4 label printer is much better and the label rolls are free issue from RM.
 
Upvote 0
I spent a couple of days at our packing desk recently to see how we can do it better and where the weak points are.

Similar to what you've said, Mike, what we're doing at the moment since I've started to make changes is starting to enter the weights on the platforms for individual items that aren't going to vary, that's helping already. On mixed orders, we are not generating the mailing label in advance, just the invoice to pick. Just marking them as you say and before manifest, going through that pile and entering actual weights.

Funny you should mention the thermal printer. I decided on one of those for mailing labels a few days ago as what we were using was slowing me down. The DPD one we have is very reliable so I ordered one of those. From ERS I ordered a DA210 thermal printer. Researching labels was my next job as DPD use square ones and we want rectangle ones for RM. Good news if RM provides them FOC. That will reduce waste and prevent ink fade too.
 
Upvote 0
Just for anyone else researching this, there is a previous topic >>here<< where a chap was having similar problems.

So the RM system learns Amazon and eBay weights as you go. But if no weights are entered on the listing, you must enter them and it remembers. The problem we found is as we'd been guessing weights, the RM system was overriding the feed-in with previously entered guestimates. The solution here is to delete the "products" from RM and let it repopulate with correct weights. Tedious.
 
Upvote 0
Just for anyone else researching this, there is a previous topic >>here<< where a chap was having similar problems.

So the RM system learns Amazon and eBay weights as you go. But if no weights are entered on the listing, you must enter them and it remembers. The problem we found is as we'd been guessing weights, the RM system was overriding the feed-in with previously entered guestimates. The solution here is to delete the "products" from RM and let it repopulate with correct weights. Tedious.

Honestly think you need to look at moving away from C&D.

ShipStation (albeit it has its problems) this Christmas has saved one member of my staff about 10 hours a week versus C&D. It has then saves my warehouse a crazy amount of time as they get the orders on proper pick-lists based on how we want they want them. Example being we can group all the scarves together so these can be picked easily. Or we can print based on warehouse location so they can pick in order of where the items are in the warehouse.

Weights are much more advantageous. Save them once in the platforms and it automatically remembers them. You can also set custom rules based on pretty much anything you want (we have about 30 rules).

Happy to have a chat if needed.
 
Upvote 0

Latest Articles