By clicking “Accept All”, you agree to the storing of cookies on your device to enhance site navigation, analyse site usage, and assist in our marketing efforts
These cookies enable our website and App to remember things such as your region or country, language, accessibility options and your preferences and settings.
Analytic cookies help website owners to understand how visitors interact with websites by collecting and reporting information anonymously.
Marketing cookies are used to track visitors across websites. The intention is to display ads that are relevant and engaging for the individual user and thereby more valuable for publishers and third party advertisers.
We can only hope, but judging by the interview he gave on CNN yesterday he's demanding to be part of the negotiating team.
Why? He wasn't even part of the "Leave" team let alone the government
FFS, did you read the 2015 manifesto?But the vast majority of UKIP non-EU policies are terrifying to any liberal-minded bod. He'll have us all singing in Church on a Sunday and watching Mary Poppins like your life depended on it
FFS, did you read the 2015 manifesto?
UKIP will be around until we get an agreement on leaving the EU. I don't mean an agreement that we should leave, which we have, I mean an agreement signed by the government on the terms under which we leave. Expect them to be around throughout Farrage's lifetime.
I'm not so sure. For many apart from the diehard Ukippers they are a one trick pony and that is to cut down immigration and now that the seeds of leaving the EC have been sown I think that most of the UKIP voters in the last general election that deserted their traditional parties will now go back to their spiritual homes
I would love to see a Leader of any party willing to take part, trouble is most of parliment is so openly in the remain camp and out of step with the majority, the deal is likely to be a very poor one IMO.
Why or Why do you keep on with the negatives and not just live with it and try and think of some positives about freedom from oversea's rule.
I am Chris Ashdown from Great Yarmouth I voted to leave for democracy, that is the belief that we can control our country far better than being part of a failing community which has no interest in changing for the better. in 12 months time of 30 years i will still admit it, and i do believe the country will be better outside the EU
MPs are being lobbied hard to ignore the referendum result, it was an 'advisory' and non-binding referendum after all.
If the MPs try and pull that stroke I think that a modern day Guy Fawkes should burn down the House of Commons.
..... and the leaked German French plan to speed up a EU superstate.
I've heard him comment he'd like to see more gun ownership like the americans, and that doctors are wrong about smoking.FFS, did you read the 2015 manifesto?
The country needs Farage more than ever with the moves to try and overturn the referendum result, and even worse the MP's who preach democracy but do not wish to practice it.
If the MPs try and pull that stroke I think that a modern day Guy Fawkes should burn down the House of Commons.
We weren't ruled from overseas so it follows that there can be no freedom from it about which to be positive. Thanks for your input though!Why or Why do you keep on with the negatives and not just live with it and try and think of some positives about freedom from oversea's rule.
Why or Why do you keep on with the negatives and not just live with it and try and think of some positives about freedom from oversea's rule.
I am Chris Ashdown from Great Yarmouth I voted to leave for democracy, that is the belief that we can control our country far better than being part of a failing community which has no interest in changing for the better. in 12 months time of 30 years i will still admit it, and i do believe the country will be better outside the EU
Y'all screeched about how undemocratic the EU was, yet clearly didn't understand how it works, and now you're doing it about the democratic system we have here.
It's almost like as far as you're concerned, 'democracy' simply means 'do what I want'.
Thank you for proving my point.My idea of democracy is our representatives carrying out the electorates wishes,
Of course they are the major complainers and they have legitimate complaints about the vote. With Farage himself saying a 48/52 split would not mean the end of it, putting the vote into the context it deserves - that of any advisory referenda, which is to say advisory - is a reasonable request.I think you will find passions have run high, but the remain camp are the major complainers, they have a right to complain, but they do not have a right to undermine the vote by trying to get a new one run just because they lost.
Of course they are the major complainers and they have legitimate complaints about the vote. With Farage himself saying a 48/52 split would not mean the end of it, putting the vote into the context it deserves - that of any advisory referenda, which is to say advisory - is a reasonable request.
Even now you argue that having expert opinion on your side is a bad thing or somehow undermines *your* idea of democracy. Of course you agree with Farage, you don't need things like facts or logic to build your opinions, and neither does he.Personally, I agree with Farage. The Remain had the power of the government, the civil service, big banks, big business, and all the 'establishment' behind it. It also used taxpayers money to issue propaganda to every home in the country. Cameron was currying favours from big business even before he completed his 'reform' negotiations. There has been plenty of bias on every main TV channel and the 'bad' news from the EU has been withheld.
It wasn't a fair fight, but we won it anyway so that removes any hard feelings that were generated by the imbalance.
Even now you argue that having expert opinion on your side is a bad thing or somehow undermines *your* idea of democracy. Of course you agree with Farage, you don't need things like facts or logic to build your opinions, and neither does he.
No, there isn't. Just because you can tip your tinfoil hat at what you perceive to be conflicts of interest does not mean the expertise of those groups and individuals is lessened or removed. You're still pushing the anti-intellectual, anti-evidence argument.There is a big question mark about 'expert' opinion from people/institutions that can have pressure placed on them by government, big banks, big business, and all those who benefit from the EU.
It's not for one side to argue against themselves, but to defend their assertions from any counter arguments. The Leave camp had its assertions taken apart from every direction: the opposition, the commision, the media, the public, and even some of their own campaigners hopping ship because of the dishonesty. However in counter argument to the Remain assertions the best they could muster was to shout "you're exaggerrating!" and "pffff, who even listens to experts!?", which, you may or may not be able to tell, do not constitute actual evidence based arguments.There are also big question marks over reports and surveys that only calculate the 'worst case scenario' of Brexit, without 'best case' comparisons, and also failing to calculate any of the risks of Remaining.
I forgot to ask, do you also agree with him that a 48/52 split should not be the end of it?Personally, I agree with Farage.
The Leave campaign seized upon the one expert opinion that agreed with them, in amongst the sea of expertise that opposed them, it's hardly a surprise they'll clamour around a story that isn't bad news in amongst all of the stories which are.http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/business-36660133
Arghhhhhhhhhhhhhh!!! Oh no, wait, that's the opposite of a national crisis![]()