Socialism
- Thread starter Mark T Jones
- Start date
I dont understand how any member of the human race cannot see it as fundamental to human existence.
I also understand that any person whose basic view on life is ME ME ME and absolute selfishness can make socialism difficult, if not impossible. So it is up to all of us who believe in people and the inherent need to ensure the welfare of all people, to prevent the selfish from taking charge of anything.
Oh damn ................
I also understand that any person whose basic view on life is ME ME ME and absolute selfishness can make socialism difficult, if not impossible. So it is up to all of us who believe in people and the inherent need to ensure the welfare of all people, to prevent the selfish from taking charge of anything.
Oh damn ................
Upvote
0
[QUOTE="Mark T Jones, post: 2887782, member: 255658"As a very broad sweep, my opener would be that it is a wonderful ideal which falls apart as soon as human nature is introduced[/QUOTE]
You appear to be confusing Socialism with Communism. Communism works until someone says "I want......"
Socialism, on the other hand, ensures that everyone has the basic necessities for life, at the expense of those who have more. They are not the same thing.
You appear to be confusing Socialism with Communism. Communism works until someone says "I want......"
Socialism, on the other hand, ensures that everyone has the basic necessities for life, at the expense of those who have more. They are not the same thing.
Upvote
0
Perhaps there are a lot less members of the human race than you suspect.
Just out of interest, are there any places where socialism has been tried as a method on a large scale and worked in your view?
I can think of a couple but I'm not sure I'm using the same idea of 'worked' as you.
The selfish appear in a lot of societies, often ending up in power. That isn't the same as national leader.
Selfishness doesn't have to be absolute, mere envy will work when you don't want someone else to get ahead.
Upvote
0
There is an evolutionary concept known as the hawks and the doves. Hawks eat doves. \if there are a lot of doves around there is a good food supply for hawks whose numbers will increase. The increasing number of hawks eat more and more dovesuntil there aren't enough doves to sustain the hwk population which decreases quite rapidly through starvation. As there are fewer hawks more doves survive and their numbers increase until the nimber of hawks increases because of the increased food supply. In an ideal world there is an equilibrium point which produces stable population numbers of hawks and doves.
I see socialism as trying to maintain that equilibrium in human society. Unfortunately there are a few too many hawks around at the moment, although some of them are beginning to die out, like Carillion which was a classic hawk.
I see socialism as trying to maintain that equilibrium in human society. Unfortunately there are a few too many hawks around at the moment, although some of them are beginning to die out, like Carillion which was a classic hawk.
Upvote
0
Upvote
0
How are you defining socialism, surely it's important to all be talking about the same thing.
Its an economic concept, not an evolutionary one.
Its an economic concept, not an evolutionary one.
Upvote
0
Carillion is not a good example as they were actually weak. They were buying work by putting in tenders that were lower than cost. The fact that many of these contracts were with the NHS and other public sector agencies meant that they were painted by the tabloids as some sort of enemies of the people. Why let a good story get in the way of the facts.
Last edited:
Upvote
0
My humble opinion is that Capitalism is really the only thing we've found so far that more or less works.
Fortunately, we're all different though, and others will have a different opinion to me.
I think capitalism is fair and equal (all sacrifice the same), but many would consider socialism to be more fair and equal (all have the same).
I tend to think that effort should produce more return, and also that socialism strives to bring everyone towards equality of outcome, which I think is totally wrong. Equality of opportunity is good, and should be striven for, but equality of outcome is usually confused as the same thing.
Fortunately, we're all different though, and others will have a different opinion to me.
I think capitalism is fair and equal (all sacrifice the same), but many would consider socialism to be more fair and equal (all have the same).
I tend to think that effort should produce more return, and also that socialism strives to bring everyone towards equality of outcome, which I think is totally wrong. Equality of opportunity is good, and should be striven for, but equality of outcome is usually confused as the same thing.
Upvote
0
- Original Poster
- #18
You appear to be confusing Socialism with Communism. Communism works until someone says "I want......"
Socialism, on the other hand, ensures that everyone has the basic necessities for life, at the expense of those who have more. They are not the same thing.[/QUOTE]
Most of the definitions I have read are a lot to do with collective ownership etc
I can't pretend to be any kind of expert - this is interesting stuff for me.
Upvote
0
Upvote
0
Indeed. How does socialism look to fund the support? Tax the rich more and after a point they lose the marginal benefit for earning, so they are no longer incentivised to earn to fund that system. Does that mean that people are inherently selfish? Probably yes.
I seem to remember from my time studying economics that one of the key principles in basic economics is that rational people are motivated only by economic and financial gain.
Upvote
0
And those looking to make more money seek out ways to improve their income.
Starting microbusiness, finding new markets for products, changing what they do.
One of my suppliers buys in stuff from the far east, lots of it handmade. Entire families producing crafted items rather than just trying to get by with day labouring and subsistence farming on marginal land.
Patriarch or Matriarch of the family is the one dealing with the buyer and is probably the rich one - the entire family benefitting from producing and selling the stuff.
Times that by a few million families...
Upvote
0
“The inherent vice of capitalism is the unequal sharing of blessings. The inherent virtue of Socialism is the equal sharing of miseries.” - Churchill, 1945
Churchill also stated that Capitalism was the least worst option.
Our nature as a hierarchical species better fits a meritocracy than socialism which seeks to replaces individual freedoms with control from the centre.
The problem we face now is that our implementation of Capitalism with an eroding social conscience and shoddy rules based framework is causing untold harm and driving huge divisions in society.
The Tories want the status quo, Labour would turn us into some kind of pacifist irrelevance bankrupting the Country within a term and the Lib Dems would make offending someone a crime punishable by public flogging.
As Churchill posed, what is the least worst option?
Churchill also stated that Capitalism was the least worst option.
Our nature as a hierarchical species better fits a meritocracy than socialism which seeks to replaces individual freedoms with control from the centre.
The problem we face now is that our implementation of Capitalism with an eroding social conscience and shoddy rules based framework is causing untold harm and driving huge divisions in society.
The Tories want the status quo, Labour would turn us into some kind of pacifist irrelevance bankrupting the Country within a term and the Lib Dems would make offending someone a crime punishable by public flogging.
As Churchill posed, what is the least worst option?
Upvote
0
Upvote
0
D
Deleted member 59730
History shows that the entrepeneurs were not dis-incentivised during periods of much higher taxation than now. In fact if you remove tax altogether from the rich they stop being productive altogether, just look at the rentier class before the French Revolution.
Upvote
0
We've tried Capitalism and it has failed. we haven't tried real socialism so you cannot say that iy cannot reverse that trend
Upvote
0
I'm too young to remember that
Certainly I feel like a fairer tax system would discourage tax avoidance and evasion....even if it doesn't stimulate production.
Upvote
0
That just sounds like a Momentum protest board slogan.
Living under capitalism has given my family the opportunities to rise from the very poorest in society to being quite well off within a generation, and the next generation of my family are forging ahead with their own career choices to better the standard of living for their children... all under capitalism.
The problem with capitalism is that social mobility is out of reach for those in generational poverty, those hamstrung as much by their own parents as they are the system we live under.
No, capitalism hasn't failed it needs modernising.
Upvote
0
Ah yes, we haven't tried real socialism bit. Was waiting for that.
Go ahead, try it. I'll wait until its done somewhere and shown all the socialists how it can work.
Please don't try experimenting at home, people have suffered enough here.
Upvote
0
S
sirearl
Are you sure,what about their brains!
If capitalism had its way many of us would have been dead by now.
Upvote
0
So the first thing the UK should do is get rid of the minimum wage and massively cut down immigration?
I wouldn't really say any of Scandinavia was particularly socialist but I'm sure having a lot of natural resources and not having your country trashed by the 2nd world war helps with any economic model.
Upvote
0
I think they just have regular snow, the same every year, for a lot of the year. This means they can spend money on rail and road infrastructure that can cope with weather.
Upvote
0
There's certainly a lot to be said for getting rid of the minimum wage, if you believe what the likes of Peter Schiff says about it.
Upvote
0
Latest Articles
-
70 years of director bans in six months: Companies House has stopped asking nicelyCompanies House published a release on August 6th 2026 that every company director should read...- Ozzy
- Updated:
- 7 min read
-
MTD for Income Tax: your first quarterly update is due 7 August.If you are a sole trader or landlord and your gross income from self-employment and property was...- maka
- Updated:
- 4 min read
-
Andy Burnham's Manifesto for Small Business, and How It Stacks Up Against Count BinfaceIf all goes to plan (or rather, to Labour's timetable), Andy Burnham will be sworn in as Prime...
- Ozzy
- Updated:
- 5 min read
-
SEO in the Age of AI: What UK Small Businesses Actually Need to KnowTL;DR Search has shifted from "ten blue links" to answer engines, and the click is dying...
- Ozzy
- Updated:
- 11 min read
-
What Carphone Warehouse, Microsoft and Uber Have in Common: They Started in a DownturnThere's a comforting myth that you need a booming economy to start something. Cheap money...
- Ozzy
- Updated:
- 3 min read