By clicking “Accept All”, you agree to the storing of cookies on your device to enhance site navigation, analyse site usage, and assist in our marketing efforts
These cookies enable our website and App to remember things such as your region or country, language, accessibility options and your preferences and settings.
Analytic cookies help website owners to understand how visitors interact with websites by collecting and reporting information anonymously.
Marketing cookies are used to track visitors across websites. The intention is to display ads that are relevant and engaging for the individual user and thereby more valuable for publishers and third party advertisers.
A tough one, I cannot, or I should say, won't, answer that for commercial reasons.
Sorry... I know it takes away the fun.
I would love to find a PR firm that put their money where their mouth was - and be paid per sale, per column inch or airtime minute - depending on their client's needs and remit.
without giving to much away maybe you would like to explain what those commercial reasons are.?:|
nope...
My post was trying to get over a few points.
1. SEO is not the be all and end all of peoples marketing options
2. PR is not the be all and end all of peoples marketing options
The two can work hand in hand.
I put my opinion out there for people to consider, shoot down, take on board, or do whatever they want to having seen the thread move into what I considered to be a bit of a knock on what PR can deliver.
I fear this will spiral into one of those back and forth forum debates that stops me coming back here as frequently as I used to.
without giving to much away maybe you would like to explain what those commercial reasons are.?:|
nope...
My post was trying to get over a few points.
1. SEO is not the be all and end all of peoples marketing options
2. PR is not the be all and end all of peoples marketing options
The two can work hand in hand.
I put my opinion out there for people to consider, shoot down, take on board, or do whatever they want to having seen the thread move into what I considered to be a bit of a knock on what PR can deliver.
I fear this will spiral into one of those back and forth forum debates that stops me coming back here as frequently as I used to.
Totally agree horses for courses.
Earl
Interesting perspective, Andy. I've blogged about it.
I would never argue it's about scientific fact rather than 'hearsay" ( I thought you preferred Girls Aloud anyway?)