By clicking “Accept All”, you agree to the storing of cookies on your device to enhance site navigation, analyse site usage, and assist in our marketing efforts
These cookies enable our website and App to remember things such as your region or country, language, accessibility options and your preferences and settings.
Analytic cookies help website owners to understand how visitors interact with websites by collecting and reporting information anonymously.
Marketing cookies are used to track visitors across websites. The intention is to display ads that are relevant and engaging for the individual user and thereby more valuable for publishers and third party advertisers.
There'll probably be a general election next year, and then Labour will be in power. With everyone being career politicians now there isn't one side I'd choose over the other. Ironically according to a few website survey's I'm more aligned to Lib Dem so have no chance.
As for her fixes for the economy, yeah god save us all.
Yep indeed. So much other stuff would have been ideal in hindsight, but I agree that the reality is a shit storm over the next couple or three years. I doubt Labour will want a general election until there is some form of light on the horizon, but nonetheless as @The Byre alluded to elsewhere the fiscal situation doesn't really have a fix for where we are now beyond riding it out.She has a huge task to tackle, with very few tools at her disposal to help her. I’m just resigned to the country facing several tough years until things work themselves out.
That is the concern I have about a GE, is that no time for any plans to make any progress because a change in Government will rip up anything in place and start again. It's just what they do.We need to get some decent plans in place and then follow the plan, atm the Gov is like a headless chicken.
Thank you for the kind mention! I and many, many others were sounding the alarm back in 2006 onwards, though not here. What I didn't know was that governments everywhere were going to make their central banks create money in unbelievably irresponsible amounts. Print, borrow and spend!Yep indeed. So much other stuff would have been ideal in hindsight, but I agree that the reality is a shit storm over the next couple or three years. I doubt Labour will want a general election until there is some form of light on the horizon, but nonetheless as @The Byre alluded to elsewhere the fiscal situation doesn't really have a fix for where we are now beyond riding it out.
That is the concern I have about a GE, is that no time for any plans to make any progress because a change in Government will rip up anything in place and start again. It's just what they do.
Now that would be truly hilarious!I think that her tenure will be measured in Weeks and Days -
Well, they're pretty damn messy right now!I would also predict things getting 'Messy'.towards the end of October.
Agree with that. The recession/depression is coming fast and things are going to get bad. Whoever is in power over the next X years going to end up holding a very poisoned chalice.Labours big problem is how not to get elected, because none of them want the poisoned chalice being offered at the next election.
Whoever won would have been unlikely to still hold the position after a year.Predictions for how long she'll last?
PM Question Time should be interesting, as when she answers ad-lib, she'll be tied in knots.
God help us all.
Who are you thinking of?Of far more concern than PMQT is when she is sat opposite considerably more capable peers / allies / adverseries on a global level.
I tend to agree with this strategy she will drop a massive package of support from price caps on energy, tax cuts and a load of waffle on NHS all the usual touchy feely stuff then thinking they have public support go for an early election before Christmas. Completely underestimating the publics wrath with the Conservatives and we will end up with a hung Parliament.I really don’t see a pathway* to a GE in 2023, or before. Things are tough now, and only going to get tougher over the next 12 months so calling a GE early (which is only in the gift of the PM/Conservative Party) is highly unlikely as they (the Conservative Party) will certainly lose seats, and probably lose power. I think they will hope that things improve between now and late ‘24 and then spin the narrative of how they guided the country through the most difficult of times etc.
*the only pathway I can see is that Truss drops a massive package of support, buys some goodwill and takes a gamble. I think this could have worked 5 weeks ago, but the lack of action from the gov (or gov to be) has harmed the Conservative brand and it will hurt them at the polling booth.
Au contraire mon ami - you forget that Madame Truss, her cup overfloweth with people to blame for the forthcoming mess. Let me count the ways. There's...I can't believe the old guard in the party are happy, however they maybe see Truss as an easy person to manipulate. Personally if she is still in power by the New Year I will be surprised.
A story published in the Evening Standard suggests they'll have enough support - 54 letters - by the end of the year.The letters of no confidence are already going in to the 1922 committee.
Dear Dear, what a absolute load of rubbish you sprout, maybe your a gardener in a sewerage factoryA story published in the Evening Standard suggests they'll have enough support - 54 letters - by the end of the year.
I have a contact who is very close to today's events, or should I say yesterday as it's gone midnightBy close I mean knowing the list of new ministers 24 hours before the rest of the world. I'm told there is a great deal of unease amongst many influential Conservatives and Truss's chance of survival are very, very slim.
The most likely candidate to take over if and when Truss is ousted?
Alexander Boris de Pfeffel Johnson
Get out of bed the wrong side this morning Mr Ashdown?Dear Dear, what a absolute load of rubbish you sprout, maybe your a gardener in a sewerage factory
The future for the Conservative party to remain in power is to make drastic change buy all working together, and they know it
Besides that she is a strong character and has lots of experience beating the odds
I'm sure I heard that in the final stages 50% of the Conservative party didn't vote and that Liz Truss got what, 57%, of the remainder? Your confidence doesn't appear to be shared.
Afraid he does not like facts they get in the way, so he uses his ownTurnout was 85% according to the speech made just before the announcement. Either that or I need my ears washing out.
Listened to Truss's speech/statement today.
She's in la la land.
Might be less than a year!
She's been in a lot of the major positions and knows her way around. She did far better than I expected Wednesday, hopefully a sign of things to come. I can't think of anyone within Labour who could give her a hard time. Media interviewers these days are just looking for pathetic gotcha's that serve only themselves, best ignoredStarmer's a mouse.
Wait till she gets interviewed by someone who is ruthless. She'll be lost.
A competent speaker, she's not.
No, though she did OK with her tribute to the Queen.A competent speaker, she's not.
Neither Starmer nor Truss are competent at anything to do with performing in public. But that is not the point of the exercise!A competent speaker, she's not.
Perhaps Chris Philp could re-use that note 'I'm afraid there is no money' in 2024?Neither Starmer nor Truss are competent at anything to do with performing in public. But that is not the point of the exercise!
But she got the first rule of governing right - never waste a crisis. She launched a “bazooka” of Government spending to deal with the energy crisis. But the billions of pounds of public money she is using to hose-down energy bills would make Gordon Brown dizzy!
The scale of the public money used to ensure lower energy bills is hard to comprehend. It is nothing less than a reset of UK energy policy, which Truss said had been failed by “decades of short-term thinking” (note the plural, to avoid admitting it was a Tory mistake - which of course it was!)
The idea now is that the UK will become a net energy exporter by 2040, while the net zero emissions target by 2050 is now under review - sounds ominous!
Truss said: “This is the moment to be bold. We are facing a global energy crisis and there are no ‘cost-free’ options. There will be a cost to this intervention.”
That is an understatement, with some forecasts suggesting it will cost the UK £200billion.
The spending appears to lack a ceiling and our interconnectors to the Continent mean we are paying the price for Germany's almost total reliance on Russian gas. How long will it be before some Tory MPs on the Right starts to call for the interconnectors to be switched off?
If nothing else, Truss’s spending has bought her a political honeymoon of sorts, with tens of billions of pounds piled on our national debt. And that is highly inflationary in the long run. Just the interest payments on the national debt are now costing the exchequer half as much as the entire NHS budget - and that is going to rise as it is linked to RPI.
Now add to all that the tax cuts to be announced by Chancellor Kwasi Kwarteng within a fortnight. The Treasury’s eyes will be on the financial markets, as the growing weakness of the pound against the dollar and the Euro is adding to inflationary pressures.
But the markets want to see Truss cutting public spending, alongside today’s energy bailout. That is where it gets difficult. As Truss’s former rival Rishi Sunak found when he tackled the Covid crisis in early 2020: spending public money is easy; turning off the taps is something else entirely.
Summed up - her present basket of measures is extremely inflationary. More government spending paid for with even more borrowing. A child of two could work out that is one hell of a turkey and it ain't gonna fly far!
The upshot is that this government is going to enter the next general election in the teeth of a full-blown stagflationary depression.
I don't dispute that, but there has been comments from her seniors in those departments that said she was found wanting.She's been in a lot of the major positions and knows her way around.
She gets the 6 questions that Starmer's going to ask, so has a prepared answer for each. It's the ad-libbing that will catch her out.She did far better than I expected Wednesday,
The PM does not have advance warning of the questions. Her own departments brief her in anticipation of likely subjects, therefore she effectively ad lib'sI don't dispute that, but there has been comments from her seniors in those departments that said she was found wanting.
She gets the 6 questions that Starmer's going to ask, so has a prepared answer for each. It's the ad-libbing that will catch her out.