By clicking “Accept All”, you agree to the storing of cookies on your device to enhance site navigation, analyse site usage, and assist in our marketing efforts
These cookies enable our website and App to remember things such as your region or country, language, accessibility options and your preferences and settings.
Analytic cookies help website owners to understand how visitors interact with websites by collecting and reporting information anonymously.
Marketing cookies are used to track visitors across websites. The intention is to display ads that are relevant and engaging for the individual user and thereby more valuable for publishers and third party advertisers.
Sorry I misunderstood your comment, you really need a professional who can advise you, if you try to do it yourself you could end up in a bad situationNo not seeking to take on anyone else at all; would be more than willing to step up myself but have no background.
You outsource it to a professional. You pay them a monthly fee and they deal with your issues. Your role would be to,liaise with them and to confirm ad implement their proposals.Definite food for thought. Am wondering how complicated it is to taken on HR responsibility for a SME without qualifications or prior experience?
Thank you; really grateful for the advice.The other advantage with bringing in outside help is they have no familial connections. They will just look at the facts and advise on the best course of actions.
My wife who has a lot of experience in these matters suggested the gross misconduct path. Very easy to prove and enforce. But first thing is to prevent access to the building. Hire a security firm today to escort them off the premises before they even get out the car.
Thank you; really grateful for the advice.
Would be easier to source out the HR but currently no money to pay anyone.
However, of course if we get rid of this person that might free some up!
I am not sure advice is enough here - The OP needs someone to act on their behalf, which the FSB does not offer.From memory the FSB offer free advice to members, might be worth considering as a stop gap joining.
I am not sure advice is enough here - The OP needs someone to act on their behalf, which the FSB does not offer.
You need to follow your companies HR policies around disciplinary procedures. You have to make sure the process is legally compliant. Your company HR person should be able to advise.So, I am insisting things are done correctly going forward.
I/we believe that realistically the only solution is for him to go. There is no coming back from this but it needs to be done in the least disruptive way possible for our sakes.
Disciplinary meeting and final written warning?
Instant dismissal?
Offer redundancy?
That’s the whole problem. They don’t have one.Your company HR person should be able to advise.
Can't wait for someone to ask if he has 'Business Use' on his car insurance, so is unable to attend the Showdown!I think all the above from the usual suspects is a load of old b£££££ks
I think you're in the wrong job
It would be best suited for someone that has the skills set to handle the situation or the business may go to wall
Hope this helps
Don't be silly its probably a company car ?Can't wait for someone to ask if he has 'Business Use' on his car insurance, so is unable to attend the Showdown!![]()
Your homework for the evening:Definite food for thought. Am wondering how complicated it is to taken on HR responsibility for a SME without qualifications or prior experience?
It begs the question of what happens to the Chauffeur, should the Production Manager be given the DCM!Don't be silly its probably a company car ?
Does he have business use on his crappy Renault Clio?Can't wait for someone to ask if he has 'Business Use' on his car insurance, so is unable to attend the Showdown!![]()
I would struggle with option 2 if someone has been dishonest, for me it would be GM and on your bike (obviously done correctly). Lesson for the future always have a meeting, document, date and file anything you are not happy with. Good luck either waySo just to update, we have taken advice and it seems our 3 options are:
1) Final written warning and undertake investigation in meantime
2) negotiate a settlement to leave
3) combination of 1 and 2 - go now with £x or leave with nothing if investigation proves misconduct.
3) push straight for GM, although likely to be difficult to prove as no immediate action was taken at time.
Why is suspension not advised? If the misconduct is serious then not suspending can be fatal to a decision to dismiss. You weren't worried about the misconduct continuing as you did not suspend, but it was so serious that you have dismissed?So to be clear and to quote:
1. Go for disciplinary and look for final written warning
2. Settlement
3. Dismiss for GM and wait to see what happens. Can always reinstate or settle before tribunal (not advised).
Suspension/demotion not advised
The written statements are proof. What has the employee said about it? What is the normal procedure for approving overtime?Husband is inclined to offer him a months wages to go immediately without any fuss.
If he refuses suspension, investigation and dismissal is plan B.
He has written statements from 2 of the factory guys that manager told them he would claim extra hours to bump wages up. Trouble is proving it
I think from memory, that he has bee there for 10 years, in which case he is entitled to 10 weks' notice money. However the OP seems determined to follow their own plan.My worry with that chain of events is it could be construed as constructive dismissal i am sure @Newchodge will have a much more informed view on that. Not sure why your not just going down the route of suspension, investigation etc. Just remember you can't assume dismissal before you have done the investigation (don't even mention the D word) put the facts to him and then review the situation / facts then if warranted dismiss.
I think from memory, that he has bee there for 10 years, in which case he is entitled to 10 weks' notice money. However the OP seems determined to follow their own plan.
No I’m really not and totally appreciate all the advice.I think from memory, that he has bee there for 10 years, in which case he is entitled to 10 weks' notice money. However the OP seems determined to follow their own plan.
Depending on what misconduct you believe has happened, if it is serious and likely to lead to dismissal if proved, suspend, investigate and hold a disciplinary hearing if the evidence warrnats it. Decide what to do based on the evidence at the hearing. OR, if you must, invite them to a protected conversation, at which you can offer a settlement for them to leave, without the conversation being used against you.Newchodge; so I’m clear what would you say is the best course of action?
If only!It was so much simpler in my day, I used to offer such guys two choices.
1- I agreed to accept their notice with immediate effect, regretfully and give them a reference.
2- I would conduct a full investigation into the thieving I knew was going on, and after the investigation I would be calling the police or taking out a private prosecution for full restitution etc.
Only ever had people choose option 1.
Which means it’s fraud. A criminal offence under the fraud act. Which means you can offer the alternatives suggested by @MBE2017Regarding the authorising of overtime there has been no gate keeping ?
Brother has been able to both authorise and send to payroll.
Husband trusted it was being done honestly