By clicking “Accept All”, you agree to the storing of cookies on your device to enhance site navigation, analyse site usage, and assist in our marketing efforts
These cookies enable our website and App to remember things such as your region or country, language, accessibility options and your preferences and settings.
Analytic cookies help website owners to understand how visitors interact with websites by collecting and reporting information anonymously.
Marketing cookies are used to track visitors across websites. The intention is to display ads that are relevant and engaging for the individual user and thereby more valuable for publishers and third party advertisers.
Hi DeltaUK
Are you the Claimant in this matter?
If so that is why the hearing fee is payable. You can pay it by cheque made payable to 'HMCS' or some of the courts accept debit cards but if you cannot get through by phone probably not an option!
The hearing is normally at the Defendant's local county court. You would have received an allocation questionnaire and that would have been the time to specify a particular court. If it is really inconvenient then you could write to the court and ask them to change but you'll need a good reason why you cannot travel and why the Defendant should travel to you.
You can take a friend to the hearing and if you are uncomfortable speaking they can ask for permission to speak for you and act as your McKenzie's friend. If you are a witness you will still have to answer any questions the judge has.
You should take copy documents to the hearing for example proof of the money you are owed, evidence of problems with the works etc (I've not read through all the posts) This should be sent to the otherside and court 14 days before the hearing together with a witness statement. It will normally tell you to do this on the court order.
Good luck!
Clare
Hi Guys,
My hearfull thank you to all of you, I won the case, she didnt even turn up and sent a letter "through a friend" a month ago that she wont be coming to the court.
The judge saw all the evidence and awarder the cost of the table and costs along with my expenses.
I could have not done without you guys, it just shows there are good people like yourself on forum who supported me and there are people who want to hurt small businesses.
Its so so hard to run a business and then you get people who wants to hurt your badly!!!
Guys my sincere thank you to all of you!!
Regards
Delta
As said, maybe Im missing something.
All the best
Steve
Hi Guys,
My hearfull thank you to all of you, I won the case, she didnt even turn up and sent a letter "through a friend" a month ago that she wont be coming to the court.
The judge saw all the evidence and awarder the cost of the table and costs along with my expenses.
I could have not done without you guys, it just shows there are good people like yourself on forum who supported me and there are people who want to hurt small businesses.
Its so so hard to run a business and then you get people who wants to hurt your badly!!!
Guys my sincere thank you to all of you!!
Regards
Delta
Ooops - sorry, as weight of forum opinion seems to be on your side (and I may be missing something) but.....
I'm not sure you were ever fully in the right on this one - and I tended to agree with Saxondale that you should had let it go.
The customer wanted £329.99 and that would have been it - I think that would have been a lot easier rather than all the stress you have gone through.
And are you not just reclaiming the damages for the tables from the manufacturer ?
To see it from the customers point of view for a moment...
They brought a product - it developed a fault. You replaced it.
This replacement then develops the same fault and you replace that.
This third replacement then develops the same fault !
Who in there right mind is going to want anything other than to get shot of this product and go elsewhere - hence asking for a full refund.
And as the chairs were no doubt brought to match the table, I cant blame them for wanting a refund on them as well.
So again, as far as i see it - a simple £329.99 would have done the trick.
As said, maybe Im missing something.
All the best
Steve
I am shocked to my guts that i feel sick, not only she got the table, a refund £624.99, now wants me to pay another £1k for the charges she mentioned.
Oh yes, read every post - in fact I expected someone else to raise the (what I thought was obvious) issue about the product being faulty 3 times.
Plus there is a post that mentions how their wooden table also split - so it seems it can happen.
I would agree that the customer was very difficult - to say the least, but I wonder how others would react if a thing failed 3 times !
I still think it would have been easier to let this be - maybe paying out the £300 odd pound that was requested.
But that said - maybe I'm too soft - when I ran my own car repair business my Unit Manager used to send me for a walk if a difficult customer came in as I always tended to side with them and not the business !
Probably why there are not millions in my bank account
All the best
Steve
I think you need to get more shut eye at night Steve![]()
Guys,
Thanks for all your help so far, now the deadline of 4th of Dec has passed and the customer has not send any money or any correspondence. I am not sure which way to go forward.
I can't afford to spend any more money on this as I am now very unsure if I will see any return on this.
Any help will be really appreciated.
Regards
Delta
If I bought a table and it split within 1 year (as in it is faulty and not fit for purpose) I would expect the supplier to replace it.
If that replacement then also broke, I would begin to suspect the goods were substandard.
If a third broke after just a couple of months, I would lose all faith in your products and would want a full refund.
I actually don't think the customer is begin unreasonable here, you have a persistent fault with your goods. Give her the refund and sort out your issues with the manufacturer.