I don't want to burst your bubble, but no one is surveying you. No one really cares cos, just like me, you are not very interesting.. No one cares.
Blimey, are you my wife?
Upvote
0
By clicking “Accept All”, you agree to the storing of cookies on your device to enhance site navigation, analyse site usage, and assist in our marketing efforts
These cookies enable our website and App to remember things such as your region or country, language, accessibility options and your preferences and settings.
Analytic cookies help website owners to understand how visitors interact with websites by collecting and reporting information anonymously.
Marketing cookies are used to track visitors across websites. The intention is to display ads that are relevant and engaging for the individual user and thereby more valuable for publishers and third party advertisers.
I don't want to burst your bubble, but no one is surveying you. No one really cares cos, just like me, you are not very interesting.. No one cares.
Looks like the system is a shambles - I filed a confirmation statement for an LLP yesterday and included the two Partners IDs as required.
They took my £34 and all seem to be fine, but then this morning I get an email saying it has been rejected because :
I did include these details, so this makes no sense. So I've just spent 30 minutes on hold and on the phone to HMRC where they told me they've been having lots of technical issues and I should try to file again next week. Apparently, the £34 fee for the rejected submission will be refunded and I'll have to pay it again when I re-file
- All active directors are required to verify their identities. You must complete verification for all directors that are as yet unverified and obtain personal codes before you can file your next confirmation statement. You will be required to enter these personal codes as part of the CS01 application.
The deadline for our filing is next Friday.
And yet you still trust it ?I re-filed again today and now it has been accepted ; there seemed to have been a few changes to the submission page.
It's very fiddly - if you miss a check box it seems to randomly un-check other ones so it takes several goes.
And you're happy with that level of control ?You either accept the requirement to prove who are with a mugshot or you resign as a director.
I see a lot of weak people on here, rather strange really, like sheep to the slaughterDo you not see a problem with this? Are you simply OK to accept the new terms? Do you not stand for anything?
So are you fighting back ? are you part of the 52% that are not willing to accept this level of control ?Doesn’t matter how I feel about the relentless surveillance, doesn’t matter how much you rail against the system. If you want to be a director you need to abide by the law.
As an aside, every time you walk into a shop, down the street, drive your car your face is being scanned. You watch TV they are watching you. Turn off your phone and the microphone can still listen. It’s everywhere. You might not like it but there is no escape. And if you use any sort of social media it’s much much worse.
Yes. Because it’s not really an onerous level of control.And you're happy with that level of control ?
Nope. I’m quite happy thanks.So are you fighting back ? are you part of the 52% that are not willing to accept this level of control ?
A lot of weak people... Like the ones posting anonymously?I see a lot of weak people on here, rather strange really, like sheep to the slaughter
But when it is will you expect somebody else to bail you out ?Yes. Because it’s not really an onerous level of control.
You can call it anonymous but that's only because i am not dumb enough to leave my signature all over the internet, but weak ? no, my advice don't be a starmer !A lot of weak people... Like the ones posting anonymously?
Not sure I understand the question. Bail out from what?But when it is will you expect somebody else to bail you out ?
I have no plans to be a terrible lawyer.You can call it anonymous but that's only because i am not dumb enough to leave my signature all over the internet, but weak ? no, my advice don't be a starmer !
Seriously you think people that wish to keep their id hidden are weak ? I can think of a lot of people that would disagree !I have no plans to be a terrible lawyer.
How is trying to hide your identity anything but weak?
JudgesName some...
Do you really think it will change for them ? they'll find some loop hole or other method to get around it they always do because our "glorious leaders" are way too stupid to stop them !!!What about dodgy companies defrauding customers? I suspect they would like to keep their details hidden as well.
Maybe so. But it's a start. It means if you want to be the director of a company you have to prove your identity. And that's a good thing.Do you really think it will change for them ? they'll find some loop hole or other method to get around it they always do because our "glorious leaders" are way too stupid to stop them !!!
No it really isn't, but by the time you find that out it will be too late, and you can then regret it for the rest of your lifeMaybe so. But it's a start. It means if you want to be the director of a company you have to prove your identity. And that's a good thing.
Regret what?No it really isn't, but by the time you find that out it will be too late, and you can then regret it for the rest of your life