Bye bye Boris?

Newchodge

Moderator
  • Business Listing
    Nov 8, 2012
    22,675
    8
    7,985
    Newcastle
    I don't know if anyone else is watching the debate on referrring Johnson to the Huse Committee?

    The tory party appears to have abandoned him. There are very few Conservative party memebers present. If a vote is taken the opposition will win.

    No one has yet spoken in his defence.

    Looks like he is on his way.
     
    U

    UkAppCoder

    Newchodge said:
    I don't know if anyone else is watching the debate on referrring Johnson to the Huse Committee?

    The tory party appears to have abandoned him. There are very few Conservative party memebers present. If a vote is taken the opposition will win.

    No one has yet spoken in his defence.

    Looks like he is on his way.


    MPs will vote on whether there should be an investigation. This is Labour's idea. Boris agrees that he should be scrutinised. These optics will be good for him because he will end up staying. This is why there are not many Conservative MPs present. It's a free vote. The motion will pass.

    Can you imagine how it would have looked if Boris had not allowed a free vote? ;)

    Instead, Labour have helped him to stay as PM!

    As usual, the Conservatives are just too wide for the left wing loons who have just scored another own goal! LOL! :)
     
    Upvote 0

    Jeff FV

    Free Member
    Jan 10, 2009
    3,891
    1,861
    Somerset
    When I saw Steve Baker say it was time for him to go I really did think that this is now the time.

    I think that one of the reasons* he has survived this long is because the ERG have had him in their pocket, but now they have realised that he is now an electoral liabilty rather than asset that support for him is costing them too much and are now removing their support for him. Without this support, his days are numbered.

    Perhaps Baker has seen the opportunity for “early mover advantage “ and will position himself for the top job. (Had Sunak moved earlier in the year, he could have taken advantage of this, and been PM now, but his chance is gone)

    *Another significant reason for his survival to date is the lack of credible replacements. Purging the party as he did in 2019 ensured his short & medium term survival, but risked his long term survival - with more experience and wiser heads around him, he may have avoided some of the mistakes he has made.

    I am not a Boris fan (no surprises there!) but in March 2020 I was hopeful that he would be good for the country as we entered the pandemic: he would surround himself with sensible people (the likes of Whitty & Valance) who would shape and form policy, and he would be the ‘showman‘ who sold them to us, a frightened and bewildered public. How wrong was I. He is the worst PM, and his government the worst, that I have lived through. This is not the Tory party that I have known (and occasionally, but not recently, voted for). Under his premiership and governance I genuinely worry for our democracy
     
    Upvote 0
    Reasons to keep the toad -
    • He is a magnificent recruiting sergeant for the SNP and PC.
    • He is pushing Northern Ireland into joining the South.
    • He is destroying the Tory party from the inside - always an amusing sight!
    • To boost his image, he is sending weapons to Ukraine.
    • He has proven once and for all time that we need to be in the EU.
    Reasons to flush the toad down the loo -
    • He is small, fat and ugly.
    • He cannot put a cohesive and coherent sentence together.
    • His gibbering idiot of a midget chancellor is ruining the economy.
    • He is making the Labour Party front bench almost look competent (I don't like them either!)
    • He appointed Pattel as Home Secretary.
    The fact that he is a deceitful and profoundly narcissistic liar is neither here nor there - that's pretty much all politicians the world over! Some extremely unpleasant people have proven to be good leaders. His main problem, apart from bad judgment, stupidity and a comic clownesque appearance, is the fact that very few actually respect him in any way. He is today an international laughing stock, an object of ridicule.
     
    Upvote 0

    MBE2017

    Free Member
  • Feb 16, 2017
    4,735
    1
    2,418
    To boost his image, he is sending weapons to Ukraine.
    • He has proven once and for all time that we need to be in the EU.

    No fan of any Politician, but would disagree with the above two points.

    Offering weapons to the Ukraine is in the West’s interest, hence many other countries doing the same.

    As for the EU, I do not see it covering itself in glory and I see no real change in the mood of the country. Keep dreaming, but the UK has partly left and will stay out IMO. Hopefully in the near future we can get a true Brexit, leaving it in its entirety.
     
    Upvote 0
    As for the EU, I do not see it covering itself in glory
    Don't get me started on all that is totally wrong with the bloody EU! Worst of the lot is the ECB - if any institution manages to destroy Europe as a political and economic project that could have had enormous potential, the ECB is that institution! They bought the whole Magic Money Tree myth lock, stock and caboodle!

    How the F did we get into this mess? Here and in the States, every leader even worse than the one before! We thought Trump was bad, but along came Biden! We thought Blair was bad, but then came Bail-out Brown and he was followed by some pie-faced buffoon who "took to pig-sticking in quite the wrong way!" Then came rudderless May and now this thing, complete with the red nose and revolving trousers!

    Can't ANY of these parties cough up someone who is even vaguely within the ballpark of being a leader? It can't be that hard, surely!
     
    Upvote 0

    KM-Tiger

    Free Member
    Aug 10, 2003
    10,346
    1
    2,893
    Bexley, Kent
    As for the EU, I do not see it covering itself in glory and I see no real change in the mood of the country. Keep dreaming, but the UK has partly left and will stay out IMO. Hopefully in the near future we can get a true Brexit, leaving it in its entirety.
    The remainer blob want us back in the EU, but the principle obstruction to that is Boris. That's why they are so determined to unseat him. The Tweets of Andrew Adonis are revealing about that.

    So dangerous times IMHO. With Boris gone the Tory party will split, with remainers allying with Labour to get us back in the EU. God help us if Captain Hindsight did become PM.
     
    Upvote 0
    With apologies to Lewis Carroll...

    "The Privileges Committee laughed: "There's no use trying," they said; "we CAN'T believe impossible things."

    "I daresay you haven't had much practice," said Boris. "When I was younger, I always did it for half an hour a day. Why, sometimes I've believed as many as six impossible things before breakfast."
     
    Upvote 0

    MikeJ

    Free Member
    Jan 15, 2008
    6,953
    2,248
    Northumbeland
    I don't know if anyone else is watching the debate on referrring Johnson to the Huse Committee?

    The tory party appears to have abandoned him. There are very few Conservative party memebers present. If a vote is taken the opposition will win.

    No one has yet spoken in his defence.

    Looks like he is on his way.


    The feeling was it's better not to be seen to be blocking an investigation that they're sure he'll get through anyway. If it was blocked at this point, Labour could jump up and down and point. If it goes to committee and he's cleared, the Conservatives can shrug their shoulders and say due procedure was followed.
     
    • Like
    Reactions: UkAppCoder
    Upvote 0

    Chris Ashdown

    Free Member
  • Dec 7, 2003
    13,381
    3,002
    Norfolk
    So downing street continued meet and drinks parties during the corvid time like they have for over 20 years and all governments

    We had a leader who could and did make decisions to sort out corvid, he also led us out of the EU as the majority of the public wanted, and also built up our defences and found new long term future partners around the world

    But that comes to nothing with most of you lot, so as stated by @NickGrogan above, who the hell are you offering as a replacement lets hear some names
     
    • Like
    Reactions: NickGrogan
    Upvote 0
    So downing street continued meet and drinks parties during the corvid time like they have for over 20 years and all governments

    We had a leader who could and did make decisions to sort out corvid, he also led us out of the EU as the majority of the public wanted, and also built up our defences and found new long term future partners around the world

    But that comes to nothing with most of you lot, so as stated by @NickGrogan above, who the hell are you offering as a replacement lets hear some names

    When Hercules was tasked to clean out the Augean stables he was not required to refill them.
     
    Upvote 0

    Lucan Unlordly

    Free Member
    Feb 24, 2009
    3,961
    994
    'Beware the jugglers' an old boss once said to me. 'People who keep so many balls in the air at one it becomes impossible for anyone to focus on a single issue'.
    Boris is very, very good at distraction politics.

    A good friend of mine who has known Boris personally and through work for many years said to me long ago that the unkempt buffoon presentation is in itself a distraction screen for an incredibly smart underbelly.
     
    Upvote 0

    thetiger2015

    Free Member
    Aug 29, 2015
    957
    411
    So downing street continued meet and drinks parties during the corvid time like they have for over 20 years and all governments

    We had a leader who could and did make decisions to sort out corvid, he also led us out of the EU as the majority of the public wanted, and also built up our defences and found new long term future partners around the world

    But that comes to nothing with most of you lot, so as stated by @NickGrogan above, who the hell are you offering as a replacement lets hear some names

    No. Members of the ruling party created laws that prohibited gatherings during COVID and then breached their own law, whilst also denying that they had breached their own law, because they didn't know what the law was. Here is one example of the law being applied to ordinary citizens: https://uk.news.yahoo.com/man-found-guilty-breaking-covid-040000895.html

    From the link: "Gavin John Wickham, 52, denied an allegation of participating in a gathering of more than two people in a public outdoor place in a tier 4 area.

    Following the guilty verdict, the bench issued Wickham with a £200 fine as well as an order to pay a £34 surcharge and £350 costs – a total bill of £584."


    Did Boris admit that the law had been broken within Downing St, when asked by the opposition during PMQs? No. He denied any knowledge of these gatherings when aske during PMQs on multiple occasions.

    Some are saying 'oh well, it's just like a speeding fine, nothing important' - missing the point entirely. The accusation is that the Prime Minister misled parliament and broke laws that his government pressed on to ordinary citizens. No matter if you think they're trivial. The government must abide by the laws they set at all times, else face disciplinary action and, to potentially have misled parliament and denied wrongdoing, even after a police investigation that resulted in 20+ fines being issued....well...time to fall on ones sword.

    You're also saying 'Well it could be worse, we could have Keith/Corbyn/Abbot/A potato as leader' - well yeah, it could be worse. Is that really a good measure to use? The 'well it could be worse' measure? Should we not be demanding more of our politicians and showing them that there are career/legal consequences for things like this?
     
    Upvote 0

    Lucan Unlordly

    Free Member
    Feb 24, 2009
    3,961
    994
    We successfully sought change when WWII was in full flood.
    Government was in turmoil when Churchill, who had support from both sides of the house, became Prime Minister. Former Secretary of State for War, Secretary of State for Air and First Lord of the Admiralty, he was a shoe in for the job in hand.

    I voted for Boris, the first time I'd ever voted Tory because I couldn't see Corbyn or anyone else on the horizon who was better. I still can't. That said, I probably won't vote at all in the next election.
     
    Upvote 0

    MikeJ

    Free Member
    Jan 15, 2008
    6,953
    2,248
    Northumbeland
    Government was in turmoil when Churchill, who had support from both sides of the house, became Prime Minister. Former Secretary of State for War, Secretary of State for Air and First Lord of the Admiralty, he was a shoe in for the job in hand.

    He really wasn't. Most people thought Halifax would get it. Halifax effectively turned it down as he thought Churchill would be better

    (and it's "shoo-in", not "shoe-in". Pedantic, I know, but it's as annoying as people rolling in the isles)
     
    Upvote 0
    So downing street continued meet and drinks parties during the corvid time like they have for over 20 years and all governments

    Perhaps I misunderstood things, but I thought the idea two years ago was that we stopped doing things that we were familiar with doing, as the primary objective was trying to protect the NHS, and save lives.

    Even bending the rules was discouraged: https://pbs.twimg.com/media/EuROpy0XAAIZkut?format=jpg&name=medium

    he also led us out of the EU

    When you say "us", who do you mean, Chris? This is UK Business Forums, but as David Frost himself acknowledged only earlier this month, it's only Britain that is at all free of the EU, not the UK.


    Like others, I've offered many names for successors in another thread...



    Karl Limpert
     
    Upvote 0

    simon field

    Free Member
    Feb 4, 2011
    6,854
    2,688
    So downing street continued meet and drinks parties during the corvid time like they have for over 20 years and all governments

    We had a leader who could and did make decisions to sort out corvid, he also led us out of the EU as the majority of the public wanted, and also built up our defences and found new long term future partners around the world

    But that comes to nothing with most of you lot, so as stated by @NickGrogan above, who the hell are you offering as a replacement lets hear some names
    Anyone who’s less smug. Thing is Chris, if he’s happy to lie so brazenly about these things, whilst smirking his smug smirk, do you not wonder what *else* he’s happily lied about? No?

    Tobias Ellwood gets my vote.
     
    Upvote 0

    Newchodge

    Moderator
  • Business Listing
    Nov 8, 2012
    22,675
    8
    7,985
    Newcastle
    Anyone who’s less smug. Thing is Chris, if he’s happy to lie so brazenly about these things, whilst smirking his smug smirk, do you not wonder what *else* he’s happily lied about? No?

    Tobias Ellwood gets my vote.
    I am sorry, Simon, but I don't wonder what *else* he’s happily lied about? There is no need. Just assume that he has lied on every occasion that he has spoken. That'ss be close enough to accurate to make no difference.
     
    • Like
    Reactions: simon field
    Upvote 0

    AWA Training

    Free Member
    Sep 7, 2016
    196
    19
    The man talked about Peppa Pig world at a CBI conference, says it all really.
    That said who are the alternatives. IMHO the Conservative Party is not fit for the purpose. It will take years to undo the damage they have done. Before anyone asks would Starmer be any different, he couldn't be much worse.
     
    Upvote 0
    Because they don't know what a woman is?

    Apparently, they do.

    2020 election, 3 women, 1 man - man wins
    2015 election, 2 women, 2 men - man wins
    2010 election, 1 women, 4 men - man wins - woman rejected in the first round
    2007 election, 1 man, man wins
    1994 election, 1 women, 2 men - man wins

    So far as I can see, no elections before 1994 had any women candidates.
     
    Upvote 0

    MOIC

    Free Member
  • Nov 16, 2011
    7,391
    1
    1,991
    UK
    myofficeinchina.com
    Let the government run the country, not be bogged down with party/gathering fines nonsense. It will be interesting if the civil servant that arranged the 'gatherings' to discuss the running of the country get's slapped with the 10k fine.

    Boris is currently leader, like him or loathe him, let him get on with it until the next election. Changing a leader now, will not do the incumbent any favours and no doubt the left will say guilty by association. Labour seem to have nothing to offer, except trying to ridicule everything that Boris/Conservatives do.

    COVID has found EVERY government wanting and NONE have come out of it in a positive way. It will be interesting to know which governments refrained from 'gatherings' in order to run their country.
     
    Upvote 0
    Let the government run the country, not be bogged down with party/gathering fines nonsense.

    I agree that letting the existing personnel carry on would be the best thing for the country and if the useless opposition parties in conjunction with the meeja manage to hound Boris out of office I would like to see Jacob Rees-Mogg stand unopposed to teach the whingers a lesson
     
    • Like
    Reactions: Chris Ashdown
    Upvote 0

    Latest Articles