I dislike the job description ‘Business Development Manager’ – it’s too imprecise and difficult to measure. If you Google ‘what is a BDM ?’ you get a raft of different definitions and job descriptions like ‘developing a network of client contacts’ or ‘seeking out new market segments’. You need to be really clear about what you expect from a BDM before you employ someone to fill that role.
Sales is different. You can say precisely what you expect (targets) and precisely whether or not your expectations have been met (performance against target).
In the sales role I’ve always wondered why companies offer a basic salary
plus commission on the first sale. Depending on the sector you can often
double a salesperson’s salary as a cost to the company (NI, car or allowance, pension, medical, recruitment fees, training, support services, other benefits) so (for example), taking on an employee with a basic salary of £40K may cost the company £80K. Then, (depending on your margins), you might need to double that £80K in revenue for the salesperson
just to break even. So, before the salesperson has brought in £160K in revenue, he or she is just a cost. It takes time to build up a sales pipeline and it could be 3 to 6 months or more before that person even brings in one sale – yet he/she gets commission on the very first sale? It doesn’t make sense.
My preference would be to pay
no commission until that £160K minimum is reached and then a higher sliding scale rate of commission on subsequent sales. In short, reward performance and over-performance.
As
@fisicx and
@AllUpHere have pointed out, you can get an awful lot of marketing for the cost of a BDM/Salesperson.