there is a massive difference between that and chartered [...]
AAT is on a par with [...] a Degree in my opinion.
I agree with you on that. Nobody is saying AAT is comparable in complexity to a chartered qualification.
And the top level of AAT is billed as equal to the first year or a degree.
My practicing certificate states that I am:
Licensed and regulated to engage in public practice in
Accountancy:
Bookeeping
financial Accounting and Accounts Preparation
Management Accounting
Payroll
Independent Examination
Taxation:
VAT
Income Tax
CT
CGT
and some other bits and bobs
Nope, it doesn't say I'm an accountant (though I am, for reasons stated above) but it certainly says AATs in practice are competent for general practice.
I wouldn't dream of doing anything 'above my station' and have no desire to.
I'm not tearing anyone a new arse, as I really can't be bothered and it's a valid debate, all are entitled to their opinions. I really think that this topic demonstrates how the AAT really aren't pushing the value of their qwualification to the industry though.
I have a few other opinions but as I have to come down on the side of my professional body on this, I'm not going to say them! Suffice it to say that competent AATs are more than good enough to work in general practice with the right experience and CPD.
Speaking of competency, David and I have inherited some right messes from high street Chartered firms (a scary number of times, too), but wouldn't dream of saying that devalues the chartered quals at all. As with the qual/unqual debate, there are good unquals and bad qualifieds, and vice versa.
If it's relevant, I have had a number of people on this forum assume I am Chartered simply from my posts. Possibly that says something about us 'mere' AATs?
Now, who wants a cup of tea?
