By clicking “Accept All”, you agree to the storing of cookies on your device to enhance site navigation, analyse site usage, and assist in our marketing efforts
These cookies enable our website and App to remember things such as your region or country, language, accessibility options and your preferences and settings.
Analytic cookies help website owners to understand how visitors interact with websites by collecting and reporting information anonymously.
Marketing cookies are used to track visitors across websites. The intention is to display ads that are relevant and engaging for the individual user and thereby more valuable for publishers and third party advertisers.
The moderation on this forum need to be tightened up. Some of these "contributors" should have been nuked ages ago.
It can easily be resolved, make this topic an 'unsticky', I don't feel it's valuable enough to be a sticky now, it's ancient and out of date, the industry has changes, web has evolved. It's just attracting forum spammers and link droppers as they will target high traffic/high response forum threads through their automated software rubbish.
No leave it ,its a great alternative to proper SEO ,and leaves us free to take the cream.
Notable absense of senior SEO's ticking the box.
Earl
I have written a Squidoo lens that links back to my website and will be writing more as I get time. No idea if it works though. I have found that listings with Hot-frog and free-index really do help get my site seen on Google so I thoroughly recommend them.
Mind showing your reasoning for that?Squidoo is a waste of time if your doing it for seo benefit because... there is none.
Mind showing your reasoning for that?
Yes, they're nofollow.Squido is no follow. I was right in the other thread. Your not an seoor you (think) you are.
While nofollow doesn't have as much juice as dofollow, it definitely has a benefit. (despite what Matt Cutts may say)
Google have devalued all blog comments in the past year or two. I can tell you though, there is juice from nofollow, just not much from blog links. There's definitely juice from squidoo pages.I don't agree with that statement at all.
Why would Google want to trust (for example) a blog comment on the Guardian newspaper? It wasn't editorially placed, so why should the person who put it there get any benefit at all frmo the authority site the Guardian has? If they were counting those type of links, all the different flavours of spam going on would be a million times worse.
So go on then - back it up with some actual evidence.
You seem to think that you've made some sudden revelation that Squidoo's nofollow, that no one's noticed before.![]()
Ok, you're entitled to your opinion. However, I am a member on a forum that has (repeatedly) managed to index threads within hours for terms, purely from linking to the thread from itself, with the relevant anchor text. The forum is nofollow. For example, a month or two ago, the forum got sick of a certain member posting his spammy job opportunity offers to it. He was banned, and after the guy came back, threatening members as well as the administrator, everyone linked to the thread in it, using his name as anchor text. The result? Within a day or two, the forum thread was ranked above his own site for his name.Squidoo is either follow or nofollow, it would be checkable in two minutes so I wasn't agreeing with them when he said that. I can't speak for Joe, but for me the part about nofollow links being of benefit was the part that I think is wrong.
Ok, you're entitled to your opinion. However, I am a member on a forum that has (repeatedly) managed to index threads within hours for terms, purely from linking to the thread from itself, with the relevant anchor text. The forum is nofollow.
No, my post was referencing a separate forumWhen did you decide this.?:|
Earl
I have noticed that about 20% of the comments in this thread are from people with less than 15 posts. I wonder what that tells us?