- Original Poster
- #1
Over a set value, all of our orders are sent using the RM Recorded Delivery Service, for obvious reasons.
Up until this week, the delivery record was, as you would expect, 100% However, this week, we have learned that one parcel has been "signed for" but not actually received by the intended recipient. As a point of principle, and due to the amount involved, a claim was lodged with the RM.
We received a reply from the RM this morning, stating that as the goods have been signed for, they have obviously been delivered. Now bearing in mind that anybody could have signed for the goods during the "delivery" process, it makes the stance of the RM rather ambiguous.
My question is, where do we go from here? We have a customer who is adamant that the goods have not been delivered and the RM saying TSB, which leads me to think that somewhere within the system, the order has been stolen. Is there any further recourse with the RM to be had or is it a case of put it down to experience and move on.
TIA
Mister B
Up until this week, the delivery record was, as you would expect, 100% However, this week, we have learned that one parcel has been "signed for" but not actually received by the intended recipient. As a point of principle, and due to the amount involved, a claim was lodged with the RM.
We received a reply from the RM this morning, stating that as the goods have been signed for, they have obviously been delivered. Now bearing in mind that anybody could have signed for the goods during the "delivery" process, it makes the stance of the RM rather ambiguous.
My question is, where do we go from here? We have a customer who is adamant that the goods have not been delivered and the RM saying TSB, which leads me to think that somewhere within the system, the order has been stolen. Is there any further recourse with the RM to be had or is it a case of put it down to experience and move on.
TIA
Mister B