So there was an accusation. Followed by a denial. Hmmm.
Love can take many different guises!
I doubt it. In fact, I wouldn't be surprised if it was Starmer's team that released these photos.
Upvote
0
By clicking “Accept All”, you agree to the storing of cookies on your device to enhance site navigation, analyse site usage, and assist in our marketing efforts
These cookies enable our website and App to remember things such as your region or country, language, accessibility options and your preferences and settings.
Analytic cookies help website owners to understand how visitors interact with websites by collecting and reporting information anonymously.
Marketing cookies are used to track visitors across websites. The intention is to display ads that are relevant and engaging for the individual user and thereby more valuable for publishers and third party advertisers.
So there was an accusation. Followed by a denial. Hmmm.
Love can take many different guises!
There can't be
I think we are now in the Purdah period before the local elections when the BBC (by law) is restricted in what and how it reports on political matters
I believe the papers and the BBC have different rules (which does not cover the Guardian's omission), i know the BBC has to walk a very very thin tightrope during election periods, if they interview someone from 1 party they have to give a fair time to every other party involved etc etc, so they tend to just steer clear of most issuesI note the Guardian doesn't mention it on the front page of their website either. All the other papers seem to though.
No. Members of the ruling party created laws that prohibited gatherings during COVID and then breached their own law, whilst also denying that they had breached their own law, because they didn't know what the law was. Here is one example of the law being applied to ordinary citizens: https://uk.news.yahoo.com/man-found-guilty-breaking-covid-040000895.html
From the link: "Gavin John Wickham, 52, denied an allegation of participating in a gathering of more than two people in a public outdoor place in a tier 4 area.
Following the guilty verdict, the bench issued Wickham with a £200 fine as well as an order to pay a £34 surcharge and £350 costs – a total bill of £584."
Did Boris admit that the law had been broken within Downing St, when asked by the opposition during PMQs? No. He denied any knowledge of these gatherings when aske during PMQs on multiple occasions.
Some are saying 'oh well, it's just like a speeding fine, nothing important' - missing the point entirely. The accusation is that the Prime Minister misled parliament and broke laws that his government pressed on to ordinary citizens. No matter if you think they're trivial. The government must abide by the laws they set at all times, else face disciplinary action and, to potentially have misled parliament and denied wrongdoing, even after a police investigation that resulted in 20+ fines being issued....well...time to fall on ones sword.
You're also saying 'Well it could be worse, we could have Keith/Corbyn/Abbot/A potato as leader' - well yeah, it could be worse. Is that really a good measure to use? The 'well it could be worse' measure? Should we not be demanding more of our politicians and showing them that there are career/legal consequences for things like this?
I presume that you'll be as upset about the fact that Starmer and Rayner have been found to be doing much the same thing at the same time and you'll be calling for them to resign as well?
No, Durham police say they don't investigate and fine retrospectively, which is not the same as saying no offence was committed.If the police don't fine someone, does that mean the rules weren't broken?
Don't investigate and fine retrospectively. Do you mean Durham police are psychic and investigate and fine people for an offence before they commit it?No, Durham police say they don't investigate and fine retrospectively, which is not the same as saying no offence was committed.
Met police had a similar policy but made an exception for BJ/10 Downing St. I think Khan'ts fingerprints would be found in that decision somewhere.
Sorry, but the photo in that article clearly shows the look of love! ?It's now on the BBC:
![]()
Angela Rayner was at a lockdown event with Starmer
Labour says no Covid rules were broken at the event, where Sir Keir Starmer was filmed drinking a beer.www.bbc.co.uk
It's now on the BBC:
![]()
Angela Rayner was at a lockdown event with Starmer
Labour says no Covid rules were broken at the event, where Sir Keir Starmer was filmed drinking a beer.www.bbc.co.uk
I find it really odd that Rayner would see a statement issued that said she wasn't there, and not try to correct the record. I quite like her as a person (she's very funny when not being overly political), but this looks like a stupid mistake.
Maybe she was too busy trying to distract Boris.
I think it strange that no-one (media) has commented on the fact that Johnson WOULD be distracted by Angela Rayner crossing her legs. I suppose, with his history it is a given.It could have been worse for Boris - it could have been a Scotsman in kilt opening and closing his legs!
So what you are saying is that AR is a secret weapon and putting a good-looking woman right opposite this over-sexed toad is a deliberate ploy to distract him. (It's a good job that Starmer cannot be similarly distracted by looking at the government's front bench!)I suppose, with his history it is a given.
(It's a good job that Starmer cannot be similarly distracted by looking at the government's front bench!)
Absolutely not. The deputy leader of the Labour party sits on the opposition front bench. I am saying that theTories, by spinning this garbage are actually acknowledging that they believe they have a leader who is led by his knob. So they believe this country is led by a knob. One of the first things they have been right about for a long time.So what you are saying is that AR is a secret weapon and putting a good-looking woman right opposite this over-sexed toad is a deliberate ploy to distract him. (It's a good job that Starmer cannot be similarly distracted by looking at the government's front bench!)
Correct, and where it all falls apart.The deputy leader of the Labour party sits on the opposition front bench.
I am saying that theTories, by spinning this garbage are actually acknowledging that they believe they have a leader who is led by his knob. So they believe this country is led by a knob.
You can spin this story to suit whatever prejudice you like.
Possibly. Are you saying that the MoS lies? Probably, in that case.The Tories aren't saying though, are they?
One unnamed Tory has said it to the MOS. By which I mean, the MOS got hold of what Rayner said and made up a story.
Every contributor to these forums has prejudices. If I use my moderator role to express my prejudices please report me.And we all know which way our newest moderator's prejudice lies
Other MPs who heard her boasting about it. Search #gingergrowler or #growlergate on Twitter.According to whom?
Turns out AR put the story out herself,
... not middle aged trouts ...
Carrie Johnson is hardly that.
The last few posts reflect very poorly on a small group of people. I hope nobody here needs reminding which small group I am referring to.
The same small group might like to look in the mirror and reflect on their own sex appeal - or lack thereof.