By clicking “Accept All”, you agree to the storing of cookies on your device to enhance site navigation, analyse site usage, and assist in our marketing efforts
These cookies enable our website and App to remember things such as your region or country, language, accessibility options and your preferences and settings.
Analytic cookies help website owners to understand how visitors interact with websites by collecting and reporting information anonymously.
Marketing cookies are used to track visitors across websites. The intention is to display ads that are relevant and engaging for the individual user and thereby more valuable for publishers and third party advertisers.
Stugster, there are quite a few options available, try posting over at www.cctvforum.com
for advice.
As for guns dont kill people etc, I thought it was the bullets that killed people... Talking about bullets, I cant believe this is real, if it is real, its a sad indication of how far gun culture has gone in the states.
http://www.bulletproofbaby.net/
Why is it ridiculous? Sometimes, when we hear about the use of guns, it comes across as if people use them to randomly shoot others. While there may be some cases like that, they are rare. By far the most common shooting deaths relate to domestic or gang-related issues. If a gun isn't handy, you can be sure a knife is."Guns don't kill people; people kill people."
Sorry Steve, I like your posts but you have been in America too long...Ridiculous statement. Firstly it totally over-simplifies the concerns, secondly it is avoiding the true issues. Constitutional right my left orchid.
And they are used in many video games. I agree that popular culture has a fascination with guns, and maybe that's an issue. Still, there are plenty of games that have characters beheading opponents or driving over pedestrians, but we don't go outside and do that.Steve, I understand that there are a whole host of options when considering murder, not just guns![]()
Guns are cult. They are fashionable. They are cool. They are great toys. They're the weapon of choice in the majority of movies! More important than all that, they are EASY. So easy that it is psychologically differentiating.
Okay! So where can I buy a CCTV camera for outside my house? Secondly, I want to hook it all up to my computer and save it to my hard drive/upload it to the net/stream the video.
The problem does not lie with legally-held firearms! I hate to repeat myself, but how many kids have been shot with a legally-held firearm?
I could come to England tomorrow, go into a few pubs and generally put myself about - and I am willing to bet I could have a gun bought under the counter in a matter of days! That is where your problem lies - anyone with any street-savvy now has access to guns for little money.
I think I'd end up obsessed with watching every frame of CCTV captured, never leave my house, grow an awful beard and walk around in underwear and a grubby dressing gown all day.
We have much more wealth today than we did 50 years ago. We have better education, housing, and public services than we had 50 years ago. Almost everyone has a TV, has a car, goes on holiday, which they didn't 50 years ago. The families of those on the streets today are unbelievably more wealthy than the families of 50 years ago. Based on the evidence, m'lud, I conclude that it has nothing whatsoever to do with wealth.
Oh good grief, one day I'm going to send you a 30 foot straw manAs for distribution of wealth, the only way to get around that is to live in a communist state where everything belongs to the government. No thank you!
So why are things worse today than they were 50 years ago? Based on your theory, wouldn't you expect a huge improvement?You've just said yourself that even the poorest sections of our society are wealthy compared to 50 years ago. That happened because of general economic growth and it floats all boats.
Which means you need about 200 years to prove your theory is right, even though it flies in the face of current evidence. What will society be like by then if you happen to be wrong?Liberal capitalism will mostly solve this but it's going to take 5 or six generations of constant economic growth plus state investment in health, education and housing.
Ignoring a couple of world wars that took care of a few generations of youth, I'm not convinced they are worse. Long term trends seem to say the opposite.So why are things worse today than they were 50 years ago? Based on your theory, wouldn't you expect a huge improvement?
Which means you need about 200 years to prove your theory is right, even though it flies in the face of current evidence. What will society be like by then if you happen to be wrong?
Yep, another useless gimmick, we dont need marketing, we need ACTION:
- Lock the buggers up
- Replace the "Human Rights Act" with a "Human Responsibilities Act"
- Make defending ones own home sacred
- Make parents responsible for the actions of their children
- Bring back discipline - including the right for a copper or teacher to give a clip round the ear hole
- Stop wasting £107 billion on quango's every year and re-invest in real services, while cutting taxes and red tape at the same time
- Leave the EU (oops sorry OT)
- Make all MP's pass a "common sense" test
^ Agreed.
The major part of the problem is kids having kids.
There should be a minimum age for concieving a child - 23.
_
It should be 23 at least - 16 year-olds have no experience of life - certainly not enough to adequately raise a child with any decent social bearing and awareness.There is a minimum age... it's 16.. but so many are contravening that law.