I don't think Andrea Leadsom will let him do that.
What power do you think she has to stop him?
Upvote
0
By clicking “Accept All”, you agree to the storing of cookies on your device to enhance site navigation, analyse site usage, and assist in our marketing efforts
These cookies enable our website and App to remember things such as your region or country, language, accessibility options and your preferences and settings.
Analytic cookies help website owners to understand how visitors interact with websites by collecting and reporting information anonymously.
Marketing cookies are used to track visitors across websites. The intention is to display ads that are relevant and engaging for the individual user and thereby more valuable for publishers and third party advertisers.
I don't think Andrea Leadsom will let him do that.
Given your loyal adherence throughout this thread to the misinformation and outright lies of the Leave campaign, you'll understand if nobody believes you.Quite possibly.
If out had lost, I wouldn't have supported a second referendum.
Why would it be unlawful? I mean, I've given up reading about it all now, but it was an advisory referendum with a very narrow margin and there's now evidence that the outcome might be different with a second one; would it cancel out the first? Of course not but with a stalemate of opinion the government would be remiss to move forward with a clearly damaging decision.I agree wholeheartedly. A second referendum is a distraction, and probably unlawful.
Given your loyal adherence throughout this thread to the misinformation and outright lies of the Leave campaign, you'll understand if nobody believes you.
Why would it be unlawful? I mean, I've given up reading about it all now, but it was an advisory referendum with a very narrow margin and there's now evidence that the outcome might be different with a second one; would it cancel out the first? Of course not but with a stalemate of opinion the government would be remiss to move forward with a clearly damaging decision.
: 1. Stupid, 2. Bigots or 3. Uneducated.
1. That there has been too much immigration to this island, by people who don't share the locals Christian values, resulting in diminished access to, and lower quality, services.
Those who are affected most by this are those who can't 'go private', in schooling or health. They compete with these immigrants for work, who, because they are desperate and come from much poorer countries, will work for much less than the locals. They'll sleep 4 to a room if they have to.
2. The EU is a deceitful and corrupt project which proceeds by stealth and autocracy. Try to object as an individual, a local parliament or even as a head of state and you will be ignored.
There is an agenda. There is a plan: 'ever closer union'. Ah, but who will run this union? Who profits from it the most?
The EU contributes to this as much as non-EU immigrants. I have read that there have been 300, 000 net immigrants to the UK this past year. You can't keep doing that and expect the locals to suck it up.
It's not rich, it's just disingenuous for anyone as vocal as the people in this thread (on either side) to suggest that if their side lost they'd quietly accept it. Fact of life, budThat's rich. But your opinions don't mean anything to me.
Your love of evidence has been notable so far by its absence, which would imply you haven't read anything yourself, so as john says, it's a bit rich to assume others haven't read anything.I wonder if those people that are still pushing the Remain agenda have actually read the EU treaties?
Do the Remainers really want to be part of a Superstate, as defined in those treaties, and have every single facet of their life governed by the EU?
I'm tired of hearing Leave voters complain that *all* Remain voters are labelling *all* Leave voters as such. I guess that's life.Boy, am I tired of hearing about how Leavers are: 1. Stupid, 2. Bigots or 3. Uneducated.
These aren't arguments. They're insults.
First of all, can you define 'too much immigration' without reference to the lies of the Leave campaign about pressure on social services? Probably not.1. That there has been too much immigration to this island, by people who don't share the locals Christian values, resulting in diminished access to, and lower quality, services.
Suck what up? The net benefit these immigrants provide to our economy and society? Or are you saying "you can't expect the locals to bottle up their prejudices forever"? Because that's how it reads.The EU contributes to this as much as non-EU immigrants. I have read that there have been 300, 000 net immigrants to the UK this past year. You can't keep doing that and expect the locals to suck it up.
What on earth are you talking about?These words you have been taught in school like "racist", "sexist" "fascist" and "homophobe" are just stones to hurl in a cultural war. They're not a substitute for reason. They are propaganda in a long game.
No it isn't.2. The EU is a deceitful and corrupt project which proceeds by stealth and autocracy.
No there isn't.There is an agenda. There is a plan: 'ever closer union'.
Right so you don't really understand the legislative process in the EU. Gotcha.I'm trying to think which member states objections to some new significant legislation would count at this point. Probably German, France, Italy, and Luxembourg. Not any of the rest; they're enmeshed, and they're economically moribund and thus don't have the leverage.
O terrific, Gove stabs Boris in the front.
These muppets are just making it up as they go.
What a bunch of to$$ers, how the hell did we let them destroy our country??
I think it's called a total cock-up.
Do the Remainers really want to be part of a Superstate, as defined in those treaties, and have every single facet of their life governed by the EU?
I did post a while back that the primary problem is Cameron calling the referendum in the first place without giving any real thought to the outcome, or how the campaigns should be run, or anything else.
I blame Cameron for most of this mess as he said before the campaigns got under way that whilst he wanted to remain in Europe it wouldn't be the end of the world if we decided to leave and he would carry out the wishes of the people whatever they decided.
If from that moment on Cameron & Co had conducted an honest and honourable campaign they would probably still have lost but Cameron would have still had the blessing of the country to carry on as PM as he most certainly was the best man for the job.
We are now left with the situation where the Government knows the will of the people but both of the people probably best qualified to carry it out being Cameron and Osborne have ruled themselves out leaving a choice between a selection of people that none of the population really want.
I don't know what it is about Europe that causes so many rifts in the Conservative Party but this isn't the first time that "Europe" has ripped the party apart and I have a sneaking suspicion that it won't be the last
I tried replying to this a moment ago but my hard drive crashed from an irony error and hypocrisy.dll got corrupted as it was being accessed too much.If from that moment on Cameron & Co had conducted an honest and honourable campaign
I tried replying to this a moment ago but my hard drive crashed from an irony error and hypocrisy.dll got corrupted as it was being accessed too much.
I'm sure it's fine now. So, you were talking about the Remain campaign being dishones<<<error:0x8f533ec1 CARRIER LOST>>>
our Government is ran by someone perhaps not so dissimilar to Kim Jong Un
He's called Tim Jong-un.
![]()
For those not in the loop on this party with barely 1% of The Commons, yet about 10% of The Lords. He was formerly known as Timothy Farroon, leader of the former Liberal Democrats. He liked to invoke the film, 300, but just came across as an angry lime.
![]()
#WeAreThe48 - reminds me of something from V for Vendetta or other rebels without a cause.
Your post reminds me of someone who has completely lost the plot
Ah yes, the incredibly powerful "I can't offer a valid argument or justify my position on the topic, so I'll call this poster a troll instead" response. As insightful as ever, Ian.That's only to be expected if you live under a bridge
Don't try to get pedantic, that was criticism. If you want deconstructive criticism, fine - you just posted the equivalent of "HE'S A POO-POO HEAD!", drawing in all sorts of implications and (ironically) slanderous slurs against his character based on what one can only presume to be your personal dislike of him or his party.Then you will have no problem deconstructing it with criticism, rather than resorting to slander.
So you see the other half of the country - arguably now the majority - who are mostly upset because this particular display of democracy was carried out upon a campaign of deliberate and unyielding deceit, as having no valid grievance?...or other rebels without a cause
Ah yes, the incredibly powerful "I can't offer a valid argument or justify my position on the topic, so I'll call this poster a troll instead" response. As insightful as ever, Ian.
If there were an emoticon for a slow clap, this is where I'd use it.
I tried replying to this a moment ago but my hard drive crashed from an irony error and hypocrisy.dll got corrupted as it was being accessed too much.
I'm sure it's fine now. So, you were talking about the Remain campaign being dishones<<<error:0x8f533ec1 CARRIER LOST>>>
Then you will have no problem deconstructing it with criticism, rather than resorting to slander.
Don't try to get pedantic, that was criticism. If you want deconstructive criticism, fine - you just posted the equivalent of "HE'S A POO-POO HEAD!", drawing in all sorts of implications and (ironically) slanderous slurs against his character based on what one can only presume to be your personal dislike of him or his party.
Let's go a tiny little bit further, shall we?
So you see the other half of the country - arguably now the majority - who are mostly upset because this particular display of democracy was carried out upon a campaign of deliberate and unyielding deceit, as having no valid grievance?
Perhaps you haven't been following the events over the past few weeks.
If there were an emoticon for a slow clap, this is where I'd use it.
So you see the other half of the country - arguably now the majority - who are mostly upset because this particular display of democracy was carried out upon a campaign of deliberate and unyielding deceit, as having no valid grievance?
.
The EU will be falling over itself to offer us a trade deal and allow us to end free movement.
Says who? 40,000 odd protesters against democracy, or the "millions" who signed the rigged petition? 40,000 You do understand that's less than 0.03% of those that voted to remain. That doesn't make a majority of anything.
Two lies come to mind that, unlike the remains "predictions", have come true already.
1 - I shall remain as PM no matter what the outcome and carry out the wishes of the people.
2 - If the event of a Brexit there will be a emergency budget within weeks.