Snake Oil?

directmarketingadvice

Free Member
Aug 2, 2005
10,887
3,530
Easily solved - the truly valuable members could be manually upgraded to full membership for free. A nice reward for brilliant content contribution and perhaps motivates other people to do the same.

I agree 100%.

If new people join the forum and see so many key members don't think paid membership is worth it, what signal does that send out?

Steve
 
Upvote 0
Off the top of my head, theres only one member I can think of that deserves a free upgrade - but anyway, enough talk about me...

I don't want to put the spotlight on any particular person but there are multiple people who are posting on ukbf at a massive rate, with a completely blatant (and free) advert in every post. Just seems like it would be good business sense to make them pay 10p a day or whatever... with their prolific posting its not like it wouldn't be worth it.

I think no matter how good value something is... unless you actually force them to pay then a large percentage of them simply won't.
 
Upvote 0
Partner wants to spend £1200 on SEO services over two months to get us to "dominate" certain Google search terms. I think its a bunch of hokum, waste of money, snake oil.

Who is right?

Or at least - what conditions would make her right and me wrong or vice versa?

Is there an easy way of checking out any particular SEO company's track record?

Hey, Give us a shout - both to change your mind and explain them 'conditions' :)
 
Upvote 0

mobyme

Free Member
Jan 12, 2004
2,556
758
N.Wales
You don't appear to be a paid member.

Steve

I am not a paid member because I do not use the forum to promote my business; if I did I would join without hesitation.

To my mind advertising in the signature by free members devalues the advertising that full members have paid for the privilege of having in their signature.

Why does a successful SEO need to circumvent the rules to save what amounts to less than 10p a day?

It's because I am not a full member that I have no further recourse other than to point out to the perpetrator that I think he is bang out of order.
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0
I think it is a complete non argument.

The people who "free load" make ukbusinessforums profit from page views and adsense etc. Without traffic this site would lose money. If you turn away "free loaders" with harsh shitty rules about no sig advertising it will be bad for them in the long run.

The full membership is more geared up for people who are in the following;

  • Think the signature link is really really good seo and worth the 48 quid. (in reality it's worth about as much as a $10 profile blast.)
  • Want people on the forum to visit their site. People are more inclined to click a live link than research a non link advert
  • Use the private forums and the web review section.

I don't see non live sig ads as an issue.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • Like
Reactions: JohnnyCash
Upvote 0

nitro23456

Free Member
Jul 7, 2009
834
253
UK
Its also kind of ironic that people who claim to have the moral high ground are the same people that have drawn out this thread to five pages of irrelevant nonsense to the poor original guy who asked the question.

Whereas the 'accused' have addressed his original question with a legitimate response. Remind me which one is spam again?

Oops here comes my sig again :) ......
 
Upvote 0
To me... your sig just makes you look like you're either another Indian spammer tha should be immediately ignored, or you're a UK person who can't play fair.

Either way your services are worthless, and even although you've bolded everything in there, I'll just ignore it all.
 
Upvote 0

directmarketingadvice

Free Member
Aug 2, 2005
10,887
3,530
Why does a successful SEO need to circumvent the rules to save what amounts to less than 10p a day?

They're not "circumventing the rules", they're following the rules. You just happen to disagree with the rules.

On a personal note, I'm not sure I'm going to continue as a paid member when it's time to decide. It's not about the money, it's to do with how little the forum is doing for its paid members.

Steve
 
  • Like
Reactions: MASSEY
Upvote 0

nitro23456

Free Member
Jul 7, 2009
834
253
UK
Last time i tested do follow blog links were of benefit. No follow blog links are of no benefit.

Now thats a discussion all in itself mate. I use many do-follow blogrolls but no-follows do have benefit in the way it makes your link profile look more natural if nothing else.

Also wikipedia is an awesome no-folow.

ETA: he hasnt sent me a PM!
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0
I ceased to be a paid member when.

A) I decided I did not want anymore work.

B) The only benefit to me was that I could discuss a subject in the members area without it appearing on google e.t.c.

C) £40 would feed a child in Africa for 6 months.

Earl
 
Upvote 0
Now thats a discussion all in itself mate. I use many do-follow blogrolls but no-follows do have benefit in the way it makes your link profile look more natural if nothing else.

Also wikipedia is an awesome no-folow.

ETA: he hasnt sent me a PM!

But why would you think wiki have value when google said turn no follow on?

I had a homepage pr8 link no follow on a high educational site, did absolutely nothing.

I had a pr5 do follow blog comment on the bbc website boosted me massively (then someone reported the blogs and they were removed) :(.

The way they do hold value is in a link profile google will look for social signals which will be no follow. This is the only way for me they are of value.
 
Upvote 0

nitro23456

Free Member
Jul 7, 2009
834
253
UK
Simply because once I have had a couple of sites added to wiki it seemed to help a lot. Can't really offer anything more scientific than that on this one. Just an observation.

In theory no-follows should have zero effect as that was the entire point of the tag being invented.
 
Upvote 0

BobbyBoy

Free Member
Nov 2, 2010
566
111
Partner wants to spend £1200 on SEO services over two months to get us to "dominate" certain Google search terms. I think its a bunch of hokum, waste of money, snake oil.

Who is right?

Or at least - what conditions would make her right and me wrong or vice versa?

Is there an easy way of checking out any particular SEO company's track record?

Hi - not sure if this helps, but we started doing SEO on our website in January, we DONT spend £1200 per month (infact we spend a fraction of that), we use a SEO who is a member here, and we now appear in position 1 for 8 of the 10 most popular terms in our niche.

If you'd like any more info, or to get his contact details simply send me a PM.


Either way, best of luck.

Bobby.
 
Upvote 0
Hi - not sure if this helps, but we started doing SEO on our website in January, we DONT spend £1200 per month (infact we spend a fraction of that), we use a SEO who is a member here, and we now appear in position 1 for 8 of the 10 most popular terms in our niche.

If you'd like any more info, or to get his contact details simply send me a PM.


Either way, best of luck.

Bobby.

Always useful to name them if they wish.?

The world seems desperately short of good snake oil salesman.:)

Earl
 
Upvote 0
If you have a landing pages that convert (I'm assuming your selling online) or at least generate leads then quality, targeted SEO is a perfect step to take.

This of course needs to be ongoing, so spending for two months and then leaving it is out of the question.

You will need to have an ongoing monthly, daily, SEO strategy.

I imagine a lot of people on here can help you.
 
Upvote 0

open sesame

Free Member
Sep 9, 2011
226
39
Your better off taking that 1200 quid spreading it across a year so £100 a month, turning it into 5 quality articles a month and smashing them on myblogguest.

Then cherry picking your offers from the results given from SEOMOZ's opensite explorer.

That's your SEO campaign for the next year sorted.
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0
Why would he do that exactly???


Your better off taking that 1200 quid spreading it across a year so £100 a month, turning it into 5 quality articles a month and smashing them on myblogguest.

Then cherry picking your offers from the results given from SEOMOZ's opensite explorer.

That's your SEO campaign for the next year sorted.
 
Upvote 0
So without looking at his website you have totally dismissed his spend as being wrong??
I am not even going to say what I think about your SEO plan, but I will say your are wrong to suggest it with out seeing what is going on first.

You don't need to see the site to know spending only £1200 via a 3rd party is going to be a total waste of money.

If you only have £1200 to spend you're going to need to squeeze every last drop of value out of it as possible. And MBG, cheap content and links is by far the best way to do that.
 
Upvote 0

open sesame

Free Member
Sep 9, 2011
226
39
I'm sorry you disagree with my SEO advice Ali, but he was asking how to dominate the rankings for his industries search term.

If he managed to get each article produced for £15 then he has potentially got an opportunity of building 80 backlinks from relative blogs/websites, not to forget the chance of picking up some email subscriptions/facebook likes as a source for remarketing not to forget some social signals.

If the articles are good then those blogs will also pick up facebook likes and social exposure which brings those backlinks some good link juice as well.

But I guess each to there own you stick with your methods and ill stick with mine.
 
Upvote 0

fisicx

Moderator
Sep 12, 2006
46,772
8
15,418
Aldershot
www.aerin.co.uk
Upvote 0

Latest Articles