World Cup madness

MikeJ

Free Member
Jan 15, 2008
6,998
2,274
Northumbeland
I was in Denmark for their first game. The guy running the place I was working told everyone they could watch the game. He laid on popcorn, sweets and soft drinks. He'll get a lot more out of his staff for the rest of the year than the couple of hours that cost him.

a) It's not just England.
b) Treat your staff with respect, and they'll repay you.
 
Upvote 0
Its complete madness - why should the working day come to a stop to watch a group of grown men running round a field playing a child's game? How may people will watch the match this afternoon - 10 million? 15 million? Out of a population of 60+ million? Its not a chance for the country to unite, its a chance for sports fans with a poor sense of priority to stamp their idiotic game on the rest of the population.

Out of a population of 50 million 15 million people watched it - How often do 15 million people get together and cheer for one thing? If you can't see the benefits of the world cup for the country and the countrys its been held in (i.e south africa) then quite frankly you have a very naive view on the matter, based purely on the fact you don't like football.
 
Upvote 0

directmarketingadvice

Free Member
Aug 2, 2005
10,887
3,530
Sense of humour failure much :p

For a joke like that to be funny, it needs to stand up.

I suppose that if you think WW2 was England v Germany (or even Britain v Germany), then maybe it does stand up...

...Except for the bit about the Americans turning up late, that makes no sense at all... also, the French didn't surrender, they were brought down by a combination of poor tactics and infighting... so, basically, it's an attempt to shoe-horn a tiresome, ill-eductated WW2 reference into a situation that just doesn't fit...

Ho, ho, ho... yawn...

Steve
 
Upvote 0

directmarketingadvice

Free Member
Aug 2, 2005
10,887
3,530
Ooo i can think of a few others that did that....... erm blackadder; monty python;only fools and horses; fawlty towers, dads army, steptoe and son...... oh thats it i agree yawn yawn yawn

I'd suggest that the fact that other people have said amusing things about a subject doesn't mean that every attempt to say something funny about that subject is amusing.

Yours is like the jokes that have gone before... but with the comedy removed.

(Along with the insight, intelligence, imagination and originality...)

Steve
 
Upvote 0
Well. Lagarda's joke is doing the rounds. It's in Popb1tch and I've had it in two emails.

Which proves nothing, but suggests that there are lots of other people who do find it amusing. Low life, unintelligent, uneducated, illiterate, ahistorical swine I'd say. Shouldn't be allowed: if it's not in the Guardian Book of Historically Accurate Sporting Witticisms, (Edinburgh edition) it should be banned and burnt!
 
Upvote 0
Well. Lagarda's joke is doing the rounds. It's in Popb1tch and I've had it in two emails.

Which proves nothing, but suggests that there are lots of other people who do find it amusing. Low life, unintelligent, uneducated, illiterate, ahistorical swine I'd say. Shouldn't be allowed: if it's not in the Guardian Book of Historically Accurate Sporting Witticisms, (Edinburgh edition) it should be banned and burnt!


Now thats how to do a retort :D genius in my opinion and the only reason steve thanked you for that post was hopefully because he learned that to respond to a humourous post that you may not like is to respond in a humourous way........


Hmm i wonder if humour is written in the genetic code and is therefore sadly missing in some people?? just a thought :p
 
Upvote 0
For a joke like that to be funny, it needs to stand up.

I suppose that if you think WW2 was England v Germany (or even Britain v Germany), then maybe it does stand up...

...Except for the bit about the Americans turning up late, that makes no sense at all... also, the French didn't surrender, they were brought down by a combination of poor tactics and infighting... so, basically, it's an attempt to shoe-horn a tiresome, ill-eductated WW2 reference into a situation that just doesn't fit...

Ho, ho, ho... yawn...

Steve

One of the saddest posts i've ever seen, it was a joke, you don't have to point out all of the historically incorrect things about it - you must have a very boring life.
 
Upvote 0

neilhwilliams

Free Member
Jun 24, 2008
27
3
Bosham
Hmmm. Interesting Steve. The Americans did, in a sense turn up late.. in 1942 after Pearl Harbour when they declared war. The war had been under way about 2 years by then. My history book says that the French surrendered in 1940. Hitler dictated that the French capitulation take place at Compiegne, a forest north of Paris. This was the same spot where twenty-two years earlier the Germans had signed the Armistice ending World War I. Hitler intended to disgrace the French and avenge the German defeat. To further deepen the humiliation, he ordered that the signing ceremony take place in the same railroad car that hosted the earlier surrender.

It was brought about by being unable to fight the blitzkreig and in-fighting; but the fact is ... they did surrender.
 
Upvote 0

directmarketingadvice

Free Member
Aug 2, 2005
10,887
3,530
Hmmm. Interesting Steve. The Americans did, in a sense turn up late..

Yes, in WW2, but not in the World Cup.

(Though, if they did, that might explain how England managed to score an early goal against them in the first game.)

As I said before, it's an attempt to shoe-horn a WW2 joke into the situation, but the humour doesn't work because the parallels don't stand up.

Steve
 
Upvote 0
The scored their 4th goal (of the tournament) in the last minute, they didn't turn up late.

As I said, "shoe-horn".



I have no idea. :)

Steve

The last minute goal made them go through, get your facts right before you criticize someone for a joke. And clearly me thinking you live a sad, boring life makes me less intelligent than you, but yet you say this then go and spread around your word like it should be listened to despite being completely inaccurate?

We must all listen to your opinion, you clearly have a great sense of humor. So what if it was an attempt to "shoe-horn" a world cup joke, if you don't like it - ignore it, quite frankly you don't sound like the sort of person i want telling me a joke.

Maybe your life would be improved if you stopped taking it so seriously, and maybe read a book on the rules of group stage world cup matches.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Upvote 0

Eagle

Free Member
Oct 3, 2004
5,235
587
UK
Last edited:
Upvote 0

directmarketingadvice

Free Member
Aug 2, 2005
10,887
3,530
The last minute goal made them go through

Yeeeessss... but it doesn't mean they turned up late...

get your facts right

I do have my facts right.

And clearly me thinking you live a sad, boring life makes me less intelligent than you,

That wasn't the point I was making, but I suppose that, if your idea of good humour is a poorly-observed and derivative joke about WW2 being England v Germany, you were never going to get my point...

but yet you say this then go and spread around your word like it should be listened to

Interesting.

despite being completely inaccurate?

Interesting again.

We must all listen to your opinion

This is soooo funny.

Let me spell it out: my reply to you was making the point that it would be crazy for me to attach any importance to your opinion of me as you don't know me. But, at the same time, you think your ill-informed opinion of me is so important, you felt the need to tell me who I am.

So what if it was an attempt to "shoe-horn" a world cup joke, if you don't like it - ignore it, quite frankly you don't sound like the sort of person i want telling me a joke.

You're not the sort of person who would get the joke.

Maybe your life would be improved if you stopped taking it so seriously, and maybe read a book on the rules of group stage world cup matches.

If I read those rules, would they tell me that a team that's been there since the first minute of their opening group game had "turned up late"?

I suspect not.

Steve
 
Upvote 0
Yeeeessss... but it doesn't mean they turned up late...



I do have my facts right.



That wasn't the point I was making, but I suppose that, if your idea of good humour is a poorly-observed and derivative joke about WW2 being England v Germany, you were never going to get my point...



Interesting.



Interesting again.



This is soooo funny.

Let me spell it out: my reply to you was making the point that it would be crazy for me to attach any importance to your opinion of me as you don't know me. But, at the same time, you think your ill-informed opinion of me is so important, you felt the need to tell me who I am.



You're not the sort of person who would get the joke.



If I read those rules, would they tell me that a team that's been there since the first minute of their opening group game had "turned up late"?

I suspect not.

Steve

This might help Steve.

The theory is an evolutionary and cognitive explanation of how and why any individual finds anything funny.

Effectively, it explains that humour occurs when the brain recognizes a pattern that surprises it, and that recognition of this sort is rewarded with the experience of the humorous response, an element of which is broadcast as laughter.

" The theory further identifies the importance of pattern recognition in human evolution: "An ability to recognize patterns instantly and unconsciously has proved a fundamental weapon in the cognitive arsenal of human beings.

The humorous reward has encouraged the development of such faculties, leading to the unique perceptual and intellectual abilities of our species.

Earl
 
  • Like
Reactions: Scott-Copywriter
Upvote 0

directmarketingadvice

Free Member
Aug 2, 2005
10,887
3,530
Effectively, it explains that humour occurs when the brain recognizes a pattern that surprises it, and that recognition of this sort is rewarded with the experience of the humorous response, an element of which is broadcast as laughter.

That makes sense.

I'm not in any way susprised by a lame England v Germany = WW2 comparison (as I've heard soooo many of these before).

What is surprising is that there are still adults in the UK who are surprised by it.

Steve
 
Upvote 0

directmarketingadvice

Free Member
Aug 2, 2005
10,887
3,530
Let me try and explain it simply, in the 91st minute USA were not in the world cup, in the 92nd they were. Now in my eyes 92nd of 93 minutes is quite late, therefore - they got into the second round late.

So they didn't "arrive late", they "qualified late".

(Unless you point out that they were, in fact, the 6th team to qualify out of 16)

What was I saying about shoe-horning the WW2 comparison into a situation where it doesn't fit?

Steve
 
Upvote 0

Latest Articles