I'm not arguing against 0800. 0800 are pretty well known and understood by customers and they had an honest job to do as sales lines. BUT their value has been eroded by the high use of mobiles where the call is not only not free but is actually expensive.
I agree the usefulness has been marginally diminished with their not being free to call from mobiles but I don't use my mobile if I have a landline to hand. I guess people who can't afford a landline are not going to be customers.
They're still useful for marketing campaigns but to get over the fact that not everyone knows what they are and that they can't be called for free from mobiles, they should always be used in conjunction with an 01 or 02 number and in adverts using the words 'free call 0800 etc' so that all the bases are coverd.
But you can't compare 0800 with other 08 numbers because 0800 are paid for by the owner of the number at a pence per second rate - they are actually very expensive to use for the number owner.
Expensive ? I don't think so. A chargeable 0845 number costs around 12p in set up costs and then about 5p per minute to call. An 0800 number costs a few pence per minute with no set up cost to the owner AFAIK.
Whereas other 08 numbers charge the caller and pay the number owner a kickback. In other words, the caller - your customer - is paying twice to call you and they resent it (as the numbers show).
Customers do resent chargeable 08 numbers from rip off corporations but 0800 is free and most people know that.
Sadly the Ofcom link no longer works or I could tell you, but we can make a few intelligent guesses.
Start with 36% not knowing what an 0800 number is then, of the 64% who know what it is add an amount for those who only use a mobile and don't want to pay for an expensive call.
The quote was that 64% know 0800 are free to call. Thus 36% are unsure but may call in any case. Their not knowing does not, according to this research, preclude them calling the number anyway, which cannot be correlated that 36% would not call.
And what percentage only use a mobile ? drug dealers, pimps, the great unwashed, all of whom are not exactly prospective customers. The figure will vary depending upon your customer demographic but I can't see many customers for most products only having mobile phones.
Whatever your guesses are, you've limited your market unnecessarily.
Just proved that to be an incorrect assumption because there is no data proving that people who do not know an 0800 number is free to call will not call that number in any case. In addition, market penetration is assisted because you have an 0800 number against not having one, as 64% of the population know it is free to call.
Again I could tell you if Ofcom hadn't removed the paper. However, it's safe to say (and Ofcom's paper said it) that almost everyone knows what an 01 number is and that it's the cheapest number to call (0800 excepted). I'd worry a little more - but not much - about 02, but as it's used for London, I doubt there's a significant issue there.
I will agree that many people know 01 is a regular number but is that greater than the 64% who know 0800 is free to call ? no data to hand. But people also associate 01 numbers with a particular area. If I wanted a local service, I would call 0800 but would not necessarily call someone with an area code outside my own. That would be limiting your market unnecessarily.
Very low. It's a risk using one at the moment although their use by public bodies like doctors, the BBC, hospitals etc is getting them more widely know. I only suggest using them if you really must have a national number. My position is that 01 and 02 are the best numbers you can use in almost all circumstances, but if you must use a national number an 03 is the best choice.
But as you agree, people just don't know how much it costs to call them, when they know it is free to call 0800. Likely years to reach 64% customer knowledge ? 1.7^500 perhaps ?
(Unless you need a free call sales line - but until the mobile issue is solved for 0800, I'd still avoid using one.)
The mobile issue does have to be resolved I heartedly agree.
This is not an argument denigrating 0800 numbers; they have their (limited) uses, it's an augment denigrating other 08 numbers - almost all of them are forms of theft in my opinion and will actually harm your business if you use them.
I could not agree more about costly 08xx numbers. No-one ever set up the website www.saynoto0800.com now did they !
Strangely I think we are on the same side, just about.
Upvote
0
