By clicking “Accept All”, you agree to the storing of cookies on your device to enhance site navigation, analyse site usage, and assist in our marketing efforts
These cookies enable our website and App to remember things such as your region or country, language, accessibility options and your preferences and settings.
Analytic cookies help website owners to understand how visitors interact with websites by collecting and reporting information anonymously.
Marketing cookies are used to track visitors across websites. The intention is to display ads that are relevant and engaging for the individual user and thereby more valuable for publishers and third party advertisers.
The answer to the question is staring you in the face.
I mean that in no way to be rude either.
You owe: £11
You give: £20
They type £12 - £11 = £1 change (but they give you £9)
It's all down to TAX (e.g. evasion)![]()
I am trying to get my head round this.
If a sale is '£11'.
And say there is £100 pot of cash in the till.
They take from me £20 and give me £9 change.
There are 2 issuess here:
1) the cash in the till
2) the records in the receipts
----1) cash in the till----
Start: £100 add £20 = £120
They take out £9 from the till to give to me and keep £11.
They will have £111 cash in the till
-----2) records on receipts--
They record £11 sale and only £1 cash taken out of till however they will have taken out £9 out of the till to give to me.
But physically they will show this cash exchange:
£100 + £12 - £9 (actual amount passed to me) = £103 recorded cash in till
??????
Is that right!!!
Their records will show a cash shortage of £8? Which is unaccounted for. Although physically it is still in the till but by record it will look 'missing'.
This is hilarious..I'm beginning to wish I never asked.
You guys are great at analysing this - it's gone completely over my head this morning!!
Quite
Seems you have a lot of time on your hands..
Now that you have all your customers.staff, accountants, advisors etc in place... need to find other gainful projects perhaps..
![]()
Well with 2 children, home and business, it's nice to come on here now and again to discuss with other business owners. Don't you think?
Yes.. it is great to come on now and again and discuss with other business owners
But.. in my opinion.. I don't see why one has to point fingers at "asian businesses"..who then get painted as money launderers.. drug dealers etc.... recommending accountants by name.. that you don't use anymore because they are expensive.. etc..
so.. in a couple of threads/posts.. you set the "world alight".
Whatever floats your boat I guess![]()
Yes, it makes you realise how quickly a couple of words get dragged threw the mud by other people doesn't it.
Consider this ...
100 customers a day ' overcharged' £1 [on the till] x 6 days per week x 52 weeks a year = £31,200.
For the customer there is actually no problem. They paid their money for their goods, and they get their goods and they get the change the expected. Just their till receipt reads that they paid £1 more than they actually did. So what. It's a minor mistake.
For the shop owner their till register says each day there should be £100 more in the till than actually there is. So sack the shop assistant!
But wait ...
What if the shop owner adds £100 to the till; the till will appear correct. the taxman will charge tax. HMRC can check back to the till receipts. Everything looks spot on. what an honest trader. In fact, over the year the shop owner could do this 312 times, topping up his till from the money he/she has tucked away for such eventualities.
The source of this mysterious pot of money ... Drugs.
Money laundering may be the explanation. Money laundering involves 'dirty money' to be 'cleaned' i.e. ligitimised and then layered. The shop owner / drugs barons don't care they pay tax on the £31,200 - the remaining say £25,000 [after tax] is now 'clean' money. It can now be paid away ligitimately to whoever is owed it.